I can handle a being that can travel light speed if they don't travel light speed on me.
Thanos has high herald level strength, nothing more. Superman is the strongest herald level being. His feats prove it.
Planet explosions are kid stuff when you talk about Superman. Thanos may be smarter than Superman but that won't matter here since there is no prep here. Thanos has to use reflexes and speed to compete.
Superman can seriously embarrass Thanos IF HE WANTED TO. Just add speed and it will happen.
I don't understand what you are saying. Remember I said the negative is always true by default until proven otherwise. Thanos can't beat Oblivion (without IG or HOTU). This is true until proven otherwise.
What is greater offensive output?
Is it:
1. ability to damage something very durable
2. ability to damage a large amount of stuff (even if it is not very durable)
or is it something else?
I pick high showings, not low ones.
The negative always true UNLESS the positive can be proven. Is that better?
The negative is that Thanos didn't beat Oblivion. Can the positive be proven (That Thanos beat Oblivion)? If so then the negative is false and the positive is true. Otherwise the negative is true by default.
I already defined it. Thanos is just more powerful. Refers to the Galactus, Mar-vell owning, ability to cause permanent death in the cancerverse as proof.
I'm still waiting on why you believe the Fallen One was only 3 meters away... He looked a lot furhter away than that.. so pleas give me the narration that backs up this claim that he was only that far away. Then, once we've established that you have NO bases for that being the distance... then that throws out your theory about how long it would take to reach light speed... which you still can't prove he was, since yaknow, it was never stated.
I asked a different question the second time. Learn to read. I asked you to define power output, not more powerful.
He didn't own Mar-vell. He merely choked him right after Mar-vell was stomping him. Peers choke peers all the time. Also Mar-vell is nowhere near Superman's level of strength.
Causing permanent death is useless if you can't cause death in the first place. It was a non feat. The cancerverse character's had shitty durability but was able to come back from the dead. The fact that they stayed dead doesn't add anything to killing someone who can't rise from the dead anyway.
This argument actually favors me more. By him starting more than 3 meters away then within the first 3 meters of travel Fallen One was going under light speed. Thanos thus saw him coming within that 3 meters of under light speed and reacted in time.
The further apart Fallen One started then the worst of Thanos reactions and speed.
Death to all infidels and heathens. I already answered it. You then asked again. I made it clear.
Prove Mar-vell is nowhere near Superman's level of strength. Thanos dominated Mar-vell who wasn't even remotely close to threatened by Nova or the Surfer.
Thanos can cause his death and Superman fighting in character means he will take some shots. It's in his character to assume he can take it.
actually it does.. in either case thanos reacted to a faster than light speedblitz.. period. The point is.. you have NO IDEA how far away the Fallen One was... you have NO IDEA how long it takes for him to accelerate to light speed and you have NO IDEA how fast he was actually traveling. Period.
KMC Community Forums
Feb 5th, 2012 11:18 PM
Official pimp of Steverules 
