LatinoStallion
Perfection
Gender: Male Location: Paradise
quote: (post ) Originally posted by FeceMan
The prevention of evil ought to be defined as good, and your argument has little bearing on this conversation. Yet more ad hominem STFU Urizenus .
Prevention of Evil ? Get over yourself Feceman.....go feed the poor or something that ..like... matters
__________________
Mar 27th, 2007 04:25 AM
Zeal Ex Nihilo
Restricted
Gender: Male Location:
Account Restricted
Go do the world a favor by dying in a fire.
__________________
Ask me about my "obvious and unpleasant agenda of hatred."
Mar 27th, 2007 04:43 AM
LatinoStallion
Perfection
Gender: Male Location: Paradise
quote: (post ) Originally posted by FeceMan
Go do the world a favor by dying in a fire.
You mean like the women in the Salem Witch Trials ?
__________________
Mar 27th, 2007 04:47 AM
Zeal Ex Nihilo
Restricted
Gender: Male Location:
Account Restricted
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Lord Urizen
You mean like the women in the Salem Witch Trials ?
I would convict that trial.
And, yes, it's so very Christian of me to do so.
__________________
Ask me about my "obvious and unpleasant agenda of hatred."
Mar 27th, 2007 04:49 AM
LatinoStallion
Perfection
Gender: Male Location: Paradise
quote: (post ) Originally posted by FeceMan
I would convict that trial.
And, yes, it's so very Christian of me to do so.
Now you're getting it
__________________
Mar 27th, 2007 04:49 AM
Alpha Centauri
Restricted
Gender: Unspecified Location: Ground Zero.
Account Restricted
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Robtard
Why do you automatically assume that a child being born will ruin lives?
Though not impossible, why is it at the forefront?
Why do you automatically skip the "possibly"?
Why do you constantly find things in people's posts that aren't there?
It possibly would "ruin" it, it possibly wouldn't. What's better? Forcing her to have the baby and going "Oops, our bad. We just f*cked up two lives.", or going with the other possibility and saving the QUALITY of life of someone who's already here? This all being irrelevant, as it's nobody's business but the woman's, technically. It's not even an issue to me, abortion I mean. I accept it's none of my business.
A woman could have the most convincing case ever, or she could be a **** using it as birth control. The latter is unfortunate, but so is the existence of the people on Earth who would force any woman to give birth if they had their way. So, I suggest they handle women who want abortions as we have to handle them; Deal with it.
-AC
__________________
Mar 27th, 2007 06:23 AM
Bardock42
Junior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Robtard
I am not debating "she" has to have the child as this topic is not about abortions being legal/illegal.
I just don't see why people assume childbirth and being a parent is such a horrible thing and it will ruin lives... as you put it "feeding a parasite". That was my point/question a few post above
No, I did not say childbirth will be, I said pregnancy is.
And if we are only on topic, showing someone by law something that will most likely emotionally upset them is cruel. And should certainly not be condoned by the state.
quote: (post ) Originally posted by sithsaber408
Because unless she was raped, she knew exactly what she was doing.
That reasoning is kinda stupid. I mean, how can you reasonably say that abortion should only be legal in some cases. Either it is a human being and then whether the mother got raped or not should mean ****, cause you don't kill humans because something bad happened to someone else. Or it is not a human being (which it isn't) and abortion is fair play (which it should be).
__________________
Last edited by Bardock42 on Mar 27th, 2007 at 08:50 AM
Mar 27th, 2007 08:47 AM
xmarksthespot
CEO, BS Comics
Gender: Male Location: Inside you.
quote: (post ) Originally posted by King Nothing
Why would you need an Ultra Sound for an abortion?
For ejumacation obviously.
There's clearly no agenda at play.
__________________
Mar 27th, 2007 10:49 AM
Robtard
Senor Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: Captain's Chair, CA
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Why do you automatically skip the "possibly"?
Why do you constantly find things in people's posts that aren't there?
It possibly would "ruin" it, it possibly wouldn't. What's better? Forcing her to have the baby and going "Oops, our bad. We just f*cked up two lives.", or going with the other possibility and saving the QUALITY of life of someone who's already here? This all being irrelevant, as it's nobody's business but the woman's, technically. It's not even an issue to me, abortion I mean. I accept it's none of my business.
A woman could have the most convincing case ever, or she could be a **** using it as birth control. The latter is unfortunate, but so is the existence of the people on Earth who would force any woman to give birth if they had their way. So, I suggest they handle women who want abortions as we have to handle them; Deal with it.
-AC
I didn't skip as I said it is a "possibility"... skipping would have been me saying "That couldn't happen."
I doubt the majority of my threads are what you claim, let alone it being a "constant".
__________________
You've Just Been Kirked To The Curb
Mar 27th, 2007 03:01 PM
Alpha Centauri
Restricted
Gender: Unspecified Location: Ground Zero.
Account Restricted
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Robtard
I didn't skip as I said it is a "possibility"... skipping would have been me saying "That couldn't happen."
I doubt the majority of my threads are what you claim, let alone it being a "constant".
You asked my why I'm assuming the child being born will ruin a life, I never said such a thing.
-AC
__________________
Mar 27th, 2007 04:11 PM
Zeal Ex Nihilo
Restricted
Gender: Male Location:
Account Restricted
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Bardock42
That reasoning is kinda stupid. I mean, how can you reasonably say that abortion should only be legal in some cases. Either it is a human being and then whether the mother got raped or not should mean ****, cause you don't kill humans because something bad happened to someone else. Or it is not a human being (which it isn't) and abortion is fair play (which it should be).
I believe what Sithy is saying is that she knew what she was doing in having intercourse and thus she must accept full responsibility for her actions. Her being raped is an exception to this.
__________________
Ask me about my "obvious and unpleasant agenda of hatred."
Mar 27th, 2007 05:30 PM
Bardock42
Junior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves
quote: (post ) Originally posted by FeceMan
I believe what Sithy is saying is that she knew what she was doing in having intercourse and thus she must accept full responsibility for her actions. Her being raped is an exception to this.
That makes no sense, why is it alright to kill a human being in a case of rape?
__________________
Mar 27th, 2007 05:40 PM
Zeal Ex Nihilo
Restricted
Gender: Male Location:
Account Restricted
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Bardock42
That makes no sense, why is it alright to kill a human being in a case of rape?
Did he ever approve of abortion in the case of rape?
(I haven't been following closely.)
__________________
Ask me about my "obvious and unpleasant agenda of hatred."
Mar 27th, 2007 05:42 PM
Bardock42
Junior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves
quote: (post ) Originally posted by FeceMan
Did he ever approve of abortion in the case of rape?
(I haven't been following closely.)
Quite possibly not, I was more commenting on the general possibilitya. Because many do believe that.
__________________
Mar 27th, 2007 05:44 PM
Zeal Ex Nihilo
Restricted
Gender: Male Location:
Account Restricted
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Bardock42
Quite possibly not, I was more commenting on the general possibilitya. Because many do believe that.
Ah. Well, I don't, and I'm not sure that Sith does.
__________________
Ask me about my "obvious and unpleasant agenda of hatred."
Mar 27th, 2007 05:45 PM
Robtard
Senor Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: Captain's Chair, CA
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
You asked my why I'm assuming the child being born will ruin a life, I never said such a thing.
-AC
You said "saving a life that's already in progress would be more pro-life than allowing another one to exist and possibly ruin both" . Why would a child ruin a life? I agreed that it isn't an "impossible" scenario, but certainly not the most probable, and there's a huge gap between "saving" life and "ruining" life.
Saving both lives would be the most "pro-life" thing if we're discussing pro-life now.
__________________
You've Just Been Kirked To The Curb
Last edited by Robtard on Mar 27th, 2007 at 06:02 PM
Mar 27th, 2007 05:58 PM
Alpha Centauri
Restricted
Gender: Unspecified Location: Ground Zero.
Account Restricted
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Robtard
You said "saving a life that's already in progress would be more pro-life than allowing another one to exist and possibly ruin both" . Why would a child ruin a life? I agreed that it isn't an "impossible" scenario, but certainly not the most probable, and there's a huge gap between "saving" life and "ruining" life.
Saving both lives would be the most "pro-life" thing if we're discussing pro-life now.
I said it would POSSIBLY ruin it, not that it definitely would. Are you asking me quite literally how it would ruin it, should it exist?
Secondly, a foetus doesn't have a life. Alive/A life are two different things.
-AC
__________________
Mar 27th, 2007 06:23 PM
Robtard
Senor Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: Captain's Chair, CA
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
I said it would POSSIBLY ruin it, not that it definitely would.
Are you asking me quite literally how it would ruin it, should it exist?
-AC
Yes, I am aware of how a mothers life could be ruined by a baby e.g. a young mother can't finish school etc., but that is subjective; the "ruin".
Edit.. I responded while you were editing... The Life/A live is not relevent to this thread really, that is more of a abortions being legal/illegal.
__________________
You've Just Been Kirked To The Curb
Mar 27th, 2007 06:28 PM
Alpha Centauri
Restricted
Gender: Unspecified Location: Ground Zero.
Account Restricted
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Robtard
Yes, I am aware of how a mothers life could be ruined by a baby e.g. a young mother can't finish school etc., but that is subjective; the "ruin".
Edit.. I responded while you were editing... The Life/A live is not relevent to this thread really, that is more of a abortions being legal/illegal.
So if you're aware of how it could, why are you asking me the silly question: "Why do you assume the Mother's life will be ruined?". I don't, I said it's possible. Not sure why you're not getting it.
The life/alive thing is, if you're talking about saving "lives".
-AC
__________________
Mar 27th, 2007 06:32 PM
Robtard
Senor Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: Captain's Chair, CA
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
So if you're aware of how it could, why are you asking me the silly question: "Why do you assume the Mother's life will be ruined?". I don't, I said it's possible. Not sure why you're not getting it.
The life/alive thing is, if you're talking about saving "lives".
-AC
You should really use my entire post if it relates... More importantly I said "Though not impossible, why is it at the forefront ?"... You'll say it is not, so there we have it.
You actually brought up "saving lives" when you said "saving a life that's already in progress..." Anyhow:
Hypothetically speaking as it relates to this thread, if a fetus that was going to be aborted, but the mother decided not to go through with the procedure after seeing the ultrasound pictures for whichever reason; a "life" would technically be "saved" when the fetus passed the legal abortion threshold or at the very least when the baby is born.
__________________
You've Just Been Kirked To The Curb
Last edited by Robtard on Mar 27th, 2007 at 06:46 PM
Mar 27th, 2007 06:43 PM
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
Text-only version