Already, you got me Arachnid!I still think Venom could take Sandman though.He had Spiderman, You cant deny the fact that without Harry's intervention Spiderman's whuppin would have dragged on alot longer.
if you take in consideration that harry wast necessary for the equation,spiderman would had been able to get on his own,but since in the movie there was a team up of course he would help, stop being a stupid fanboy. spiderman always held his own against venom, using tricks or whatever,he just cant loose,and the whupping wouldnt go on cos this is SPIDER man movie,not mr goo MAN movie,and kids watch this and they wouldnt do that like the octopus removed scene.
venom is stupid he could had killed spider on 4 ocasions.
and remember...THIS IS JUST A MOVIE!
Also, Harry was very necessary. Otherwise, pete would have died then and there and he wouldn't have found out Venoms weakness.
But ya, since its a movie, its obvious peter wouldn't have died. But then again, I would have been very disappionted if Harry hadn't of came to save his best friend.
EXACTLY!!Pete would have never found Venom's weakness again if Harry didnt intervene.Dont call me a stupid fanboy, I never said Spidey wouldnt WIN!I said the beating would have resumed longer than it did.And it would have, because the only reason it ended was Harry flew in to save the day.Spidey would have came out on top in the end obviously, but Venom would have given him a much longer whuppin without Harry there.That was the point I was trying to bring across so dont jump to conclusions.Yes, Spiderman has always been able to hold his own against Venom, but not without suffering a whuppin first!