you dont know that for a fact, what is known as a fact is that, at the end of Batman Begins, the Joker IS on the loose and his origins will be explained through flashbacks, you cant just take big assumptions like that.
if Nolan does change the origin, good for that, anything he does change has made it amazing, thank god he doesn't listen to fans as much as he does
__________________
Last edited by xNIXSONx on Aug 10th, 2007 at 03:14 AM
i really like how he just smears on the red smile over his scarred one...it makes it creepy AND it lets him leave a calling card other than his calling card (smeared smiles!!)
no its you who is being 'blind'. atleast when i complain about Batman 89, i backed it up with some stuff atleast rather than JUST make big assumptions about a movie that will release literally, a year later from now.
yeah his logic kills me. Here he is saying that you dont mess with the jokers origin and yet he doesnt care how they screwed it up in that crapfest batman 89 movie. I love it. He sure is being blind.Yeah you at least backed up your reasoning with joker in batman 89 where his is just pure speculation saying crap like this movie will be crap when he is blindly going on nothing but pure assumption.Knowing him,he probably loved it the way sony ruined the latest spiderman movie with sandman being unle bens killer.He probably loved that moronic change.So far unlike Raimi,Nolans changes with the batman source material have benefitted the batman franchise and got it headed in the right direction.He has been pushing all the right buttons-he's got to improve on the batmobile though,thats really the only bad change he made.There is no evidence out there right now to know how the movie is going to be and yet he is saying its gonna be as bad as batman and robin.shot his credibility right there for sure.
__________________
Last edited by Mr Parker on Aug 10th, 2007 at 10:06 PM
yeah definately, sandman literally had no place being in Sp3, even when they introduced him as uncle ben's 'actual' killer. As for the tumbler, i heard it is getting destroyed and batman rolls around on that little 'batcycle' type thing for a bit. There is literally no way TDK and Chris Nolan could ever stoop down to the level of Batman & Robin i dont even know how the name chris nolan could ever be put into a sentence with any negative words anyways
No, truthfully, Venom had no place being in SM-3 as he ended up with the less amount of screen time.
__________________ "It wasn't even about the eggs. Quite frankly I like the eggs, I don't have no...problem with...It's just there's always been a lot of tension between me & Lois. It's not so much as I want to kill her...I just want her...to not be...alive anymore. I sometimes wonder if all women are this difficult. Then I think to myself, wouldn't it be MARVELOUS if I turned out to be a homosexual?"
SP3 was a mess, Sony and fans pushing for Venom/Eddie Brock, a character which shouldve been in the Spider-Man series in the beginning. Sandman, the director's favourite villain who believes Sandman is underrated, and who's origin had to be altered to be in the film. Harry Osborn, shouldve re appeared in a horrific Goblin costume appears to be a ninja rocket racer...
k here's my vision, throw in a michael bay high contrast film direction and perfect action angles and screenplay and some explosions but have spiderman stopping some NY city terrorist threats to help support the war against terror.
SP1: intro same but include Eddie Brock as well, Goblin has better costume, kill gwen stacy
SP2: mj love thing, brock/parker feud grows, Doc Ock, Osborn feud grows
SP3: Venom and Goblin II.
(a bit vague in but you get the idea?)
(or we can give it to burton and have a black/grey spiderman played by nicholas cage, set in a gothic medieval new york setting, with harry osborn played by depp and eddie brock played by keaton)
Well, technically, everyone on this board is going on assumptions... Pretty much no one can really know how good or bad the movie is gonna be. It could be a sucessful sequel, like Superman 2, or it could stink, like other movies I won't mention... The movie is no where near being out yet, so speculation is all you can do. The movie is so closely guarded that "only your undertaker knows for sure..." I mean, just because Begins was great doesn't mean the sequel will top it... (I have faith, but I'm not assuming it will be good or bad)
__________________ JESUS SAVES!
Last edited by Bat Dude on Aug 13th, 2007 at 03:54 AM
im pretty sure everyone's having the same mixed feelings just like before Batman Begins was released. The Scarecrow - potato sack mask and a suit. The Tumbler batmo-tank. Christian Bale? not to mention Batman Begins being poorly marketed.
lol NO, i was saying, before Batman Begins was ever released, when we knew literally nothing about it, but that it starred Christian Bale w/ the pic of him hunched over in the Batsuit.
i was saying that a lot of people were probably thinking "is he gonna do a good job" JUST like how we are doubting Heath Ledger right now, and even the dark knight movie itself
and nothing was wrong with scarecrow but god... lol read my posts "BEFORE BB was ever released" , just like before TDK is gonna be released, people are sayin stuff bout Joker and this and that. my post stated "people probably thought" meaning, generalizing about peoples thoughts waaaaay before BB was out
edit: i knew nothing about BB before it was out, i had no idea it was being made, i saw a pic of Batman it looked cool, and i said who is christian bale but thats out of the question
__________________
Last edited by xNIXSONx on Aug 13th, 2007 at 05:53 PM
KMC Community Forums
Aug 10th, 2007 01:11 AM
Here he is saying that you dont mess with the jokers origin and yet he doesnt care how they screwed it up in that crapfest batman 89 movie. 
