Templares Sleep Deprived Gender: Male
quote: (post ) Originally posted by JesusIsAlive But you can conduct extensive analysis of matter and life, and record their complexity and complicaton respectively. Thus, you can prove that matter and life did not arise by accident, or random chance, but is the product of an extremely wise, knowledgable, intelligent, and exceedingly powerful Designer.
__________________ Templares Of The Winding Path
12:51 AM
Zeal Ex Nihilo Restricted Gender: Male
Account Restricted
Yes, a "God of the gaps" is lame.
__________________ Ask me about my "obvious and unpleasant agenda of hatred."
03:53 AM
JesusIsAlive Restricted Gender: Unspecified
Account Restricted
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Templares Recognizing complexity IS the problem. Rainbows are effing complex . . . . to 16th century people. For them a powerful Designer must have designed them.
We've just now decoded the human genome (this is a rhetorical question). We sent people to the moon 40 years ago and we are still only in the early stages of space exploration (another rhetorical question). I think your statements do more to reinforce my reasoning that life, matter, and energy (considering all of their multitudinous complexity and complication) cannot exist without God. __________________ Life After Death? || Bill Wiese
Last edited by JesusIsAlive on Jul 24th, 2007 at 05:26 AM
05:12 AM
Shakyamunison Nam Myoho Renge Kyo Gender: Male
quote: (post ) Originally posted by JesusIsAlive We've just now decoded the human genome (this is a rhetorical question). We sent people to the moon 40 years ago and we are still only in the early stages of space exploration (another rhetorical question). I think your statements do more to reinforce my reasoning that life, matter, and energy (considering all of their multitudinous complexity and complication) cannot exist without God.
__________________
05:23 AM
Shakyamunison Nam Myoho Renge Kyo Gender: Male
quote: (post ) Originally posted by JesusIsAlive Meaning?
__________________
06:19 AM
Adam_PoE Senior Member Gender: Male
We are still waiting for your explanation.
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Adam_PoE By all means, explain how Intelligent Design qualifies as a scientific theory when it is not testable, correctable, falsifiable, and does not make any predictions about the natural world or its phenomena.
__________________
12:29 AM
AngryManatee Sexy Ham Manwich Gender: Male
quote: (post ) Originally posted by JesusIsAlive We've just now decoded the human genome (this is a rhetorical question). We sent people to the moon 40 years ago and we are still only in the early stages of space exploration (another rhetorical question). I think your statements do more to reinforce my reasoning that life, matter, and energy (considering all of their multitudinous complexity and complication) cannot exist without God.
__________________
04:02 AM
Shakyamunison Nam Myoho Renge Kyo Gender: Male
quote: (post ) Originally posted by JesusIsAlive You did not answer the question.
__________________
04:17 PM
Zamp The Blind Critic Gender: Male
Intelligent Design Is a scientific theory. It is falsifieable because it relies on the idea of a young earth. The Young Earth possibilty has been debunked. It relies on having a TOTAL lack of fossil evidence, but we have fossil evidence. ID is a scientific theory that has been falsified. If christians were scientists, they would have abandoned ID long ago just like scientists abandoned the flat earth model long ago. ID is dead.
__________________
04:24 PM
JesusIsAlive Restricted Gender: Unspecified
Account Restricted
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Jbill311 Intelligent Design Is a scientific theory. It is falsifieable because it relies on the idea of a young earth. The Young Earth possibilty has been debunked. It relies on having a TOTAL lack of fossil evidence, but we have fossil evidence. ID is a scientific theory that has been falsified. If christians were scientists, they would have abandoned ID long ago just like scientists abandoned the flat earth model long ago. ID is dead.
You do not have any fossil evidence linking any two species together, let alone the millions that should exist. __________________ Life After Death? || Bill Wiese
04:28 PM
Shakyamunison Nam Myoho Renge Kyo Gender: Male
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Jbill311 Intelligent Design Is a scientific theory. It is falsifieable because it relies on the idea of a young earth. The Young Earth possibilty has been debunked. It relies on having a TOTAL lack of fossil evidence, but we have fossil evidence. ID is a scientific theory that has been falsified. If christians were scientists, they would have abandoned ID long ago just like scientists abandoned the flat earth model long ago. ID is dead.
__________________
04:28 PM
Shakyamunison Nam Myoho Renge Kyo Gender: Male
quote: (post ) Originally posted by JesusIsAlive You do not have any fossil evidence linking any two species together, let alone the millions that should exist.
__________________
04:29 PM
Zamp The Blind Critic Gender: Male
quote: (post ) Originally posted by JesusIsAlive I refuted those. You couldn't even tell me what two species they linked.
ARCHAEOPTERYX
04:37 PM
Shakyamunison Nam Myoho Renge Kyo Gender: Male
quote: (post ) Originally posted by JesusIsAlive Prove it.
__________________
04:40 PM
Boris New Member Gender: Male
Why do you even bother addressing what he posts, he is taking the piss.
04:41 PM
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threadsmay not post repliesmay not post attachmentsmay not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF vB code is ON Smilies are ON [IMG] code is ON
Text-only version
KMC Community Forums
Jul 22nd, 2007 12:51 AM
