no.. neo was still greater than smith. but he couldnt defeat all the smiths. smith was the anoamly while smith could copy everyone in the matrix. his ability made him more powerful becuz of sheer numbers. when he copied the oracle he copied one powerful program that neo was still more powerful than. its just neo had to let smith win to truly defeat the smith program.
neo sold his loss to truly trick and defeat smith.
Where did it say neo wasn't trying his best and he let smith to win? Please show proof! It is your OPINION only! He let him to copy him because it is the ONLY way to kill him! Otherwise, neo CANNOT beat smith in ANY other ways! Yet smith can beat neo! Also, numbers are also count for power. By the end, Smith has taken control of the matrix, while neo WASN'T! He had more control of the matrix than neo did. Smith can set the place, weather, etc. Can neo do this? So, Smith>neo. Please don't argue again. I would NEVER change my mind to say neo is better.
Last edited by vader11 on Oct 2nd, 2007 at 07:15 AM
as the oracle said, smith is neo. smith is neo's opposite. neither one could trump each other. neo had to sacrifice himself to save the humans. if neo hadn't let smith copy over him, they would still be fighting right now.
Exactly! Smith IS neo. They are about the same. So NO WAY neo is better! If I really have to choose the better one, I would choose smith as he can copy people and he has taken control of the matrix. He can set the place, weather, etc, neo CANNOT.
Stop repeating the same arguement. If you say neo cannot be beaten one on one, then Smith also cannot be beaten one on one too! If you disagree, please show PROOF that smith can be beaten by neo, if not, then SHUT UP! Smith is just the opposite of Neo so they are the same(it is FACT)! end of story. And other of smiths are also smith and they would beat neo.
So STOP arguing neo>smith! If you continue to argue people would think you are a neo fanboy and you will be shamed for arguing against fact.
Last edited by vader11 on Oct 3rd, 2007 at 05:34 AM
Yeah, as many people said before, it is a fact that neo is equal to smith so there is no reason to argue about it. If you still say neo>smith then you are an idiot.
one on one he was. he let smith copy him. he sold his loss to fool smith. he sold his hopelessness. smith couldnt be stopped in the matrix and copied everyone. if it was one on one and thats that neo would prevail.
Finally you admit that neo>smith is just your opinion, so that's NOT a fact.
Therefore people here don't need to care about what you think too. If you THINK neo>smith, then other people can say smith>neo too since that's their opinion.
I also doubt why you make this silly thread, since smith would beat vader without much problem(you agree too) and you don't care about what others think.
Last edited by vader11 on Oct 3rd, 2007 at 05:39 PM
i disagree. smith's copying ability is what made him unstoppable. he ruined the matrix and couldnt be stopped. it took neo to sell a loss to fool smith into being erased. if neo won that battle it would have gained him nothing.
Stop you idiot!!! Why you quoted the same thing once again and repeating the same arguement!!! The only thing you have said was just "neo selling his lost" without any proof to support it. You simply know nothing about debate. Go back to school, kid. If you don't have any new agruement then SHUT UP you neo fanboy! If you have you own opinion, others can have too! And please proof smith would be beaten by neo. And please proof neo let smith win. I can say smith let neo beat him too! If other smith helps, neo would be beaten in 0.001 seconds! And yeah, you agree that smith is unstoppable, that's make him>neo. It is a FACT that neo = smith. And FACTS>your shit opinion! Now SHUT UP and STOP quoting the same commment and repeating your SHIT opinion once again!
btw, I saw that you have just registered for 4 months and already have >13000 posts, which means you are really an idiot who has nothing else to do.
Last edited by vader11 on Oct 4th, 2007 at 02:26 PM
KMC Community Forums
Oct 2nd, 2007 07:02 AM
