And it' s counterproductive for the members whose time and energy is limited, and have to wade through those posts.
Now get back on topic please.
__________________
I am not driven by people’ s praise and I am not slowed down by people’ s criticism.
You only live once. But if you live it right, once is enough. Wrong. We only die once, we live every day!
Make poverty history.
Gender: Unspecified Location: Visiting Canada. It's almost like t
Account Restricted
-AC all Storm pointed out is a very long post is not always needed.
Verbosity is not always the way to get your point across. Why the need for constant repitition of the same argument thorought your post, and the overanalyzing of very minor points?
It makes following in a thread a boring task.
__________________ with thanks to the awesome Cresh
1) A DHS investigation, if one occured (re: investigations require both time and money, and even a single investigation that turns up false can have irrecoverable effects upon an accused individual and the family) would need more than this.
a) does this mean that if the person is abusing the child it may happen again? YES
------> however: protection from potential crime has NEVER been grounds enough for removing the rights of an individual.
b) does this mean that DHS is doing nothing? **** NO, and I don't know where that came from.
------>For instance, they tried to get the kids to write something out. This is to let a child express something without being led by an adult. This is them doing something. They legally need better evidence before anything else can be done. Also the idea that they wouldn't be doing everything in their power to stop it is asanine.
Everyone gets really emotional when it comes to stuff with kids. This is specifically the reason why MORE caution is necessary when making these accusations. A father being wrongfully accused of molestation will not recover, psychologically or socially. A father wrongfully accused of molestation may become so emotional that they become convinced that they were a molester.
Some hard evidence would be good. Sperm in the child's underwear, the father's skin under the nails of the girl, anything. Just because we all get really hot and bothered by child rape doesn't mean that standards of evidence and due dilligence get thrown out the window.
Gender: Unspecified Location: Visiting Canada. It's almost like t
Account Restricted
I knew what it meant, I don't see why child rape would engender that reaction, so I don't understand what he meant by joining the two together. This is confusing. Inamilist what do you mean?
__________________ with thanks to the awesome Cresh
Last edited by Dexter_Morgan on Oct 3rd, 2007 at 06:16 PM