Dude are you trying to say that Harrison Ford isnt a great actor? whats with the laughing I would say he has great taste in good actors? Harrison Ford is a great actor and takes his work seriously unlike many actors. Seriously thats damaging your credibility if thats indeed what your saying that he's not a good actor.This is the kind of comment I would expect A.C. to say,not you.If thats what your implying.shame on you.
__________________
Last edited by Mr Parker on Mar 20th, 2008 at 11:56 PM
Yes, actually, Del Toro convinced mignola to combine art designs and other elements from Pans Labyrinth into Hellboy2. Apparently, it took some convincing on Mignola's part, but he eventually concurred with Del Toro. With that in mind, im particularly anxious for this movie. Del toro is a great Director with epic vision and Mignola is concerned with keeping Hellboy as Hellboy. From your comment, though, i'm betting you already knew the Pan's Labyrinth thing,eh..,you is a shifty one.
__________________ "If you tell the truth, you never have to remember anything" -Twain
(sig by Scythe)
Don't talk about damaging credibility when your favourite method of debating combat is to spout off nonsense, flame, get whooped and then put someone on ignore without admitting that you're wrong.
That's just a straight no then? No explaination, no reasoning, no opinion. Yet you somehow think Edward Norton's a 'better' actor because he has played the smart-arse in a few roles? Think for a minute, please. Who better to lead the audience through an hour and a half's worth of SFX and dodgy exposition than, until recently, the highest grossing actor in history? Who maintains a human story in films like Blade Runner and The Fugivite? Seriously, if you expect Edward Norton to pull off a character like Bruce Banner half as well as you could Harrison Ford, I simly applaud you for your daring stupidity.
Again, that's not saying Norton is in no way a bad actor, but considering the kind of film we are talking about, have a clue mate.
Edward Norton clearly suits the part better, and yeah no explanation, reason, or opinion cause it only seems to fuel your weird obsssion with arguing with everything I say, but then again this forum is probably the only contact with human life you have outside your box, so i cant exactly blame you for your lack of social skills
Again i'm not saying Harrison Ford is a bad actor infact he is definetely one of the greats but its my opinion that Ed is more suited, and I am entitled to that
Then what are you doing here? And since you are here, can you write standard english please? I wouldn't want to throw a canted insult at your country now, would I.
Fair enough, if that is your opinion of Edward Norton; you're wrong of course (lack of reasoning or explaination only weakens your point) but you were the one who jumped up with the subjective deniability clause, not me, so you can deal with it. A bit of a shitfest on all accounts really.
I'm on here to DISGUSS movies and such unlike you who has to be a complete tool about everything. How can my opinion be wrong? How can me preferring an actor over another actor be wrong and I’m not obliged to give you my reason or explanation, I’ll save that for someone who can actually discuss things civilly,
And the comment on my grammar or whatever just shows how petty you are lol, no one likes a no it all
Oh jesus, come on kid, you're looking at a discussion right in the face and you react like a Tory running from the 21st Century; of course your opinion can't be wrong, but since you aren't offering any kind of retort to my point, I can only suggest you are incredibly stupid or you have no valid reason for your opinion.
And this is taken from another post...
And you call me petty?
Now, you want to 'discuss things civilly' or are you going to insult me kiddo?
I read a good run of the reissued "special edition" UK ones back in the day, and although I'm not a big Hulk fan, I get the jist of it. I'm quite sure when I say Harrison Ford would be better than Ed Norton I mean it wholeheartedly and not simply a jibe.
"Oh jesus, come on kid, you're looking at a discussion right in the face and you react like a Tory running from the 21st Century; of course your opinion can't be wrong, but since you aren't offering any kind of retort to my point, I can only suggest you are incredibly stupid or you have no valid reason for your opinion."
I believe I said that after a snide remark was made, yes? Okay my reason for thinking Ed Norton is a better actor suited for the part is first of all the movie Primal Fear, where Edward Norton plays a young twisted killer, If you have seen it you will agree his performance was simply chilling, one minute a timid stuttering kid the next an angry raving psycho. He also played someone with a split personality in fight club, his performance in American History X was outstanding, his performance in 25th Hour also very good. Ok so who better to play The Hulk when you look at his track record of mentally unstable characters? Then you have Harrison Ford who is a very good actor with roles in massively popular movies such as Star wars, Indiana Jones and Blade runner. Admittedly Ford’s performance in all these were perfect and no one else could play the part in my eyes, but to say he would play Bruce Banner better than Edward Norton to me is crazy (again my opinion). So there that’s my reason but this is all actually pointless because of course you are going to find some flaw to fixate on yet again.
And no im not going to insult you lol wouldn't want to wake the beast
KMC Community Forums
Mar 20th, 2008 11:30 PM
You are such a hilarious smart ass....
and I’m not obliged to give you my reason or explanation, I’ll save that for someone who can actually discuss things civilly,
