X-Men movie quote aside, I was being serious. You were asking a question you already knew the answer to.. Let me spell it out for you.
See?
And yeah SmashBro. There's plenty of topics in the anime board involving Superman. For instance, you should see the debates between EndlessMike and Carver9. hoho
Okay, remind me not look at anymore reviews on that FG website. I saw the review for MKvsDC and I should have known it was gonna be extremely stupid. I was actually expecting him to make some sense for once but I guess that's expecting too much.
First, I've noticed that a lot of people have said that KK and FF are guessing games. It's NOT just a guessing game. It's also a reaction game too. It also takes good timing to make it work (I'm mainly talking about the defensive position). The fact that it's pretty difficult to dodge the opponent all the time might have you THINK it's just a guessing game and that's understandable but it's really not.
Next he says the Test Your Might feature gets old just because the animations are the same. Umm...okay why would you worry about animations in a minigame if you're trying to win a match?
He says that the gameplay would have been more satisfying without the Kombo Breakers and the Rage meter, even though he doesn't explain why. I also don't think he realize that it's because of those features (mainly the Breakers) is why we don't have as many infinites in the game as we would have. He also says it's slow and got some stiff movements. The gameplay is definitely not slow. It moves at a good normal speed and if that's slow to him, then too bad. The stiff movements are very minor while most of the time, the movement is pretty fluid and smooth. I personally don't consider them stiff movements, just delays and this time, they're pretty appropriate.
Next he says sidestepping isn't as effective as it could be. Sidestepping is very useful in this game. Infact, IGN said that the sidestepping made the projectiles darn near useless. Not that I agree with them, I'm just saying but seriously you can tell this guy plays too much Tekken and SC, which he unsurprisingly just happened to compare this game to. Since they're two completely different games from MKvsDC, you can tell his point was going nowhere.
Of course, he's got some personal complaints (like the animations and stuff) and got the nerve to say that MKvsDC is just entertainment and not a fighting game. I guess he means fighting games aren't entertaining...or whatever kind of bull crap he's implying. But I'll tell you one thing; it is more fun most of those other games out there.
Gender: Male Location: In Luna's mane, chasing STAAARS!
I just can't believe MKvsDC got bad reviews. That game should've gotten more credit but instead people say it's bad. I put my money on the table and say that all those reviewers are MK fans who didn't like the toned down violence (which I may add is the most stupidest thing Midway has ever done in the history of gaming). I know I'm upset about the less violnce and gore, but I still find this game to be friggin awesome. You can go bite me reviewers, you know nothing
It has gotten some good reviews but yeah, they just simply don't give it enough credit. Some sites rate it lower than the last three, which I think is very absurd.
Alot of Frankie's reviews on games, like MK, just downright suck. You can tell he's not really fit for reviews. I think he should just pipe down now.
Well, you have to remember that he's just one person out of all the people who played this game. You can't expect everybody to give "MK vs DC" a positive review just because you, personally, think it's a great game.
It's his site, so he can do whatever he wants to do on that site. If he wants to make a review for a game he dislikes, then no one can stop him from doing that.
Gender: Male Location: In Luna's mane, chasing STAAARS!
Okay, maybe I went a little overboard talking like that. But hey, this ain't the first time a gamer doesn't like seeing bad reviews on one of their favorite games.
I don't look at video game reviews that much, so they barely affect my choice of video games.
I just think it's funny how you're mad at other people for saying the game sucks. You was the main, if not only, KMC member who said the game was going to be unsuccessful because of the toned down violence and "T" rating, so it's funny hearing you say that...
Gender: Male Location: In Luna's mane, chasing STAAARS!
I'm just wondering (I'm not against this), what made Midway create a MKvsDC game? I can picture a dozen different crossovers Ed Boon would've done but instead, he did MKvsDC. Why?
You can't forget that there's a lot of people out there who might take his review as legit. Plus he thinks what he says is a fact so it would be no surprise if someone questions what he said.
And no one can stop me from criticizing him either. If I feel that what he says is ridiculous and false, I'm gonna say something about it.
KMC Community Forums
Dec 19th, 2008 07:44 AM
Umm...okay why would you worry about animations in a minigame if you're trying to win a match?
Sidestepping is very useful in this game. Infact, IGN said that the sidestepping made the projectiles darn near useless. Not that I agree with them, I'm just saying 
but seriously you can tell this guy plays too much Tekken and SC, which he unsurprisingly just happened to compare this game to. Since they're two completely different games from MKvsDC, you can tell his point was going nowhere.
