Registered: May 2008
Location: Over the hill and far away
Account Restricted
Success doesn't mean good.
Try actually arguing against my points. I am actually really interested in what you think of them.
Well your MK biased but claim not to be and you also want a sequel to a generally crappy idea and game on some levels. The heroes powers and stuff was the highlight of the game really.
If the game wasn't good, it wouldn't be successful.
You didn't really make much of a point and you didn't really give any reasons either. You basically just said "this suck, that suck, blah blah blah", just running off your opinion.
Again, no I'm not. How many times I gotta tell you that?
Like I said, the game wouldn't be a success if it was crappy. In addition, the idea of a crossover like this was done before and nobody complained so I don't see what's the big fuss about with this one.
Man, I don't know what your problem is.
Last edited by Bro SMASH on Jul 11th, 2009 at 12:03 AM
Registered: May 2008
Location: Over the hill and far away
Account Restricted
Are you trying to say every thing that was a success was good?
Well I want to see what parts you disagree with.
You can say "no" but your posts say otherwise.
The games not completely crappy but the fighting system needs work and the idea of it isn't great either to be honest. The differences in power are to much, now if there were street level characters (people with no powers) it could have worked allot better and game the lesser known guys some good press.
From the way I see it, yes. The fact that the game was a success should tell you that something about it was good that people liked.
Nearly everything you said I disagree with. I happened to like the storyline and villain. To me, that was a good way to put it. Do I think the engine need some improvements? Yes but not big ones like you claim. And I think it has a decent amount of characters (heck you got some games with fewer characters). The characters are all well done and the DC characters blend well with the MK characters.
No they don't. They go well with what I say.
What the heck kind of idea is that? Do you seriously think people would be satisfied to see lesser known characters to represent DC over more iconic characters? Seriously, that's just a terrible decision and sure as heck wouldn't make the game any better. That's the one of the worst ideas I've ever heard.
Deadly Alliance was MK5, Deception was MK6, Armageddon was MK7... so obviously MKvsDC had to be MK8.
And in the endings of MKvsDC, they used the voice of Taven, kinda hinting MKvsDC's connection to the games before it (mainly Armageddon).
So like it or not, it may in fact be canon to the series.
Nothing can be a worse idea than Dark Khan, in all seriousness.
And made poor Shang Tsung his b!tch.
As for Shao Khan's ending, I wouldn't be surprised if those said villains he freed ended up turning on him, especially if Superman Prime was among them as some of us speculated earlier from the ending pic.
Registered: Jun 2008
Location: In Luna's mane, chasing STAAARS!
I don't know Ridley. Shao Kahn may have his own Legion of Doom which would probably be awesome to see. That really was Superman Prime you saw in Kahn's ending.
Registered: May 2008
Location: Over the hill and far away
Account Restricted
Not villains. Dark Kahn,
Everyone likes some things that they know sucks. A secret pleasure or whatever its called. Oh and when I first started playing I loved it, the heroes were fun etc but I tried again recently and after playing allot of other fighting games the sighting gameplay is just not good enough. Needs to be...smoother I guess you can say. But its an improvement over the last games so as long as they keep on moving they could have some good gameplay.
Not a sequel because Mk needs to be sorted out itself before any is made and the idea is pretty bad anyway.
Anyway I don't like talking to fanboys, go and play with Dark Kahn or something.
Registered: May 2008
Location: Over the hill and far away
Account Restricted
Are you stupid?
That's what I'm saying, Dark Kahn sucked the rest were fine.
I don't play the other games like Marvel vs Capcom. Never liked the idea either to be honest but I read comics so maybe that's got something to do with it.
Why am I a troll or a fanboy? Because I say your true love isn't all that great, its funny seeing you keep denying being a fanboy, pathetic really. Its OK to be a fanboy. I'm a fanboy of...well Snake maybe I donno.
Then just say Dark Kahn, instead of just saying "heroes".
You just don't like crossovers. It's as simple as that. Me? I enjoy crossovers and I like both MK and DC so I'm okay with this.
I just told you already, I'm not a fanboy and that is the absolute truth. And I find it annoying that you not only keep calling me one for no apparent reason, but you did it at an inappropriate time. That gets on my nerves and that's why I called you a troll.
Registered: May 2008
Location: Over the hill and far away
Account Restricted
I like crossovers just this one was pretty stupid. If they were less powerful characters it could have been fine. I liked Batman in it. I can let the massive change in powers go easily. But doesn't mean there should be a sequel.
But you are a fanboy. And frankly you give MK a bad name like over zealous SF fanboys give SF a bad name. Your hurting the cause not helping it.
Jul 10th, 2009 11:00 PM
Do you seriously think people would be satisfied to see lesser known characters to represent DC over more iconic characters? Seriously, that's just a terrible decision and sure as heck wouldn't make the game any better. That's the one of the worst ideas I've ever heard.
