All the ways you wish you could be, that's me. I look like you wanna look, I **** like you wanna ****, I am smart, capable, and most importantly, I am free in all the ways that you are not.
Gender: Male Location: The epitome of my evolution.
Account Restricted
The same way Kratos eats gods for breakfast in God of War? The same way Taven, a mortal, beat Rayden's ass with utter ease in Mortal Kombat Armageddon? The same way Raiden was injured by.. "raptor ninajs" in the second Mortal Kombat movie? Gandalf is a god (Demi-god, rather.), yet he could be killed by orcs...
one more person who didnt read the conditions of the fight.
__________________
All the ways you wish you could be, that's me. I look like you wanna look, I **** like you wanna ****, I am smart, capable, and most importantly, I am free in all the ways that you are not.
All the ways you wish you could be, that's me. I look like you wanna look, I **** like you wanna ****, I am smart, capable, and most importantly, I am free in all the ways that you are not.
thread starter specified Raiden from the first MK movie, so thats what we have to work with.
He has his power of thunder and lightning, plus he can come and go like the wind. and being a God means he doesnt tire or bleed.
__________________
All the ways you wish you could be, that's me. I look like you wanna look, I **** like you wanna ****, I am smart, capable, and most importantly, I am free in all the ways that you are not.
All the ways you wish you could be, that's me. I look like you wanna look, I **** like you wanna ****, I am smart, capable, and most importantly, I am free in all the ways that you are not.
The mere fact that Raiden can come and go like the wind, in addition to his godly powers, thats enough really.
They square off and Raiden starts dematerializing/materializing around the room, Palpy is gonna have his hands full.
__________________
All the ways you wish you could be, that's me. I look like you wanna look, I **** like you wanna ****, I am smart, capable, and most importantly, I am free in all the ways that you are not.
Gender: Male Location: The epitome of my evolution.
Account Restricted
What "godly" powers? Show them to me. Your entire argument seems to hang upon Raiden having some uber magical powers that he can pull out of his ass even though we've never seen him do them before.
Regular old lightning is something Sideous can easily handle, considering lightning is his forte. Teleportation is only helpful for dodging attacks. It won't help him against someone who knows what direction you're going to attack from before you even do it, thanks to the force. Sideous lightsaber will cleave right through his staff and his hands with no effort. So this is how it will play out.
Raiden can't get in close because he does not have anything that can beta a lightsaber. So his only hope is to teleport out of reach and shoot lightning blasts, which is something Sideous can easily counter with both his hands and his lightsaber if need be. So... what weapons does Raiden have to kill Sideous with? His hat and his bad diologue maybe?
well, it was never specified if Palpy had a saber or not, so until the thread starter specifies, we can drop that one.
An up close Raiden pwns Palpy. Did you see what he did to Lui Kang when Lui attacked him?
__________________
All the ways you wish you could be, that's me. I look like you wanna look, I **** like you wanna ****, I am smart, capable, and most importantly, I am free in all the ways that you are not.
Gender: Male Location: The epitome of my evolution.
Account Restricted
A lightsaber is the standard weapon for all Jedi and Sith, considering he kept one in his sleeve for all of his time as chancellor, I.E. the first three movies, it's logical to assume that he would start off with one. That'd be like saying in an Obi-Wan vs. whoever match that because the thread starter didn't specifically say Obi-Wan had his lightsaber, he doesn't have it.
And the thread starter didn't say Luke had his lightsaber in the Luke vs. Neo thread, yet you automatically assumed he had it and even used it in several of your arguments. You're using a double standard because it suits your argument. Again.
KMC Community Forums
Jun 14th, 2008 07:43 PM
