That is different. Heat Ledger is dead, there are pictures of his body. and its a weird comparation, this is real life and the other thing is a movie.
But we saw two-face's corpse being buried or something??? We have only seen his fall and him lying in the ground, and then some harvey dent memorial, but could you say that he is really death??? What is the evidence.
__________________ The beatles, best group ever.
John Lennon, Musical genius of all time
Helen Mirren and Julie Christie , most lovely british actresses of all time.
You said that they could change Two-Face's story and motivations for the next film, which would be a disaster if they did... Nolan's films are CONNECTED... They are one big story told through 3 films... Changing Two-Face that drastically in the next one would be a disaster...
Burton's films were not one big story, each were their own story, so he could change around motivations for characters and such without having to worry about what happened in the previous film... THAT'S what I meant...
Yea I think the only thing that tied Batman Returns and Batman together was the two Vicki Vale mentions (Bruce scolding Alfred for letting her in the batcave and him telling Selina about her)
__________________ Bruce: You've got, sort of a dark side, don't you?
totally agree and it IS lame oh and nobody would disagree with you Now about Venom so thats really not a good point to bring up.after all,Raimi is an idiot director when it comes to that franchise just like Burton and Schumacher.Nolan isnt one of those idiots so I just dont see him pulling another Burton/schumacher on us.If that IS the end of two Face,well the rest of the batman movies will suck for me.
__________________
Last edited by Mr Parker on Aug 22nd, 2008 at 10:23 PM
yeah I would say that proves he WOULD mind.I totally agree.Yeah so what if batman took the blame for it all they could still use Two Face as a catalyst to the next story.Yeah thats one thing i dont care about the Nolan films as well is that the secondary villains seem to have gotten the shaft but I think you meant Ras got the shaft didnt you? cause Scarecrow was caught and locked up as Dark Knight showed. and yeah that really would suck to see them build him up like this just to have it all end on that kind of note.I also hope he comes back in the next film and screws up Batmans plans and reveals himself as harvey dent as well.I mean come on,I fail to see how anyone can be satisfied with them building him up to be Two face,he becomes two face briefly at the end,and just vanishes forever after that.That would suck.
Exactly Like I just said,Nolan has proven he is the only Batman director that knows what he is doing with the Batman movies.The only one that had a good vision for him.I just dont see him being the idiot that Burton and Schumacher were and killing him off.That would be just plain stupid.and Bakerboy,dont bother with the nutty professor.The kid obviously has proven that he gots to stoop to childish insults when people dont agree with him.ignore him.He's not worth the time.
I don't like the way the watered down version of him was presented in the Dark Knight either though if he is dead. I think they could have done a movie that would be very good without exploiting him like that.
__________________ Bruce: You've got, sort of a dark side, don't you?
and like "I" said before,if Nolan doesnt bring him back in the next sequal,that will equal the stupidity of Burton,Schumacher and Raimi the way those three idiots killed off important villains.so far Nolan has been pressing the right buttons,dont NOW go and be an idiot like those3 stooges.Those 3 stooges i would expect something idiotic like that from them.Nolan is not the idiot those 3 comicbook directors are.
I largely disagree. As far as I'm concerned, only his origin stories are finished. There is much more that could be done with the character, so to me to kill him off now would be a waste of such a great villain.
__________________ You guys need to start taking things a little more seriously.
Like what? I'd really like to know exactly what he could do that would make sense... But all anyone is saying is "he can come back, it'd be a waste if he didn't"...
We need to face it: He can't really do much... His character was driven by giving those ASSOCIATED WITH RACHEL'S DEATH a fair "trial"... Now that most of them are dead, he has no reason to come back...