KMC Forums

 
  REGISTER HERE TO JOIN IN! - It's easy and it's free!
Already a member? Log-in!
 
 
Home » Star Wars » Star Wars: Literature & Expanded Universe » Starkiller or garen malek is unbelievably overpowered.


Starkiller or garen malek is unbelievably overpowered.
Started by: Schwarzenegger

Forum Jump:
Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (2): « 1 [2]   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread
Final Blaxican
Restricted

Registered: Jan 2006
Location: The epitome of my evolution.

Account Restricted


 

Why is it okay that Maul "almost killed Sideous" yet when Starkiller does it he's overpowered?

I mean yeah Maul is heavily overrated, but n one believes me... sad


__________________


Old Post Aug 15th, 2008 10:07 PM
Click here to Send Final Blaxican a Private Message Find more posts by Final Blaxican Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Gideon
Restricted

Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Your Mom.

Account Restricted


 

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Blax_Hydralisk
Why is it okay that Maul "almost killed Sideous" yet when Starkiller does it he's overpowered?

I mean yeah Maul is heavily overrated, but n one believes me... sad


Because testimonies vary. Some say Maul was being toyed with. All that matters is that he was put through a ridiculous training regimen and quite possibly nearly killed Sidious with a lightsaber. Not the Force.

Old Post Aug 15th, 2008 10:19 PM
Click here to Send Gideon a Private Message Find more posts by Gideon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Darth Subjekt
The beginning of the end.

Registered: Oct 2004
Location: On cloud 9 in 7th heaven! I didn't


 

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Gideon
I wasn't responding to you, DS, nor was I disagreeing. Otherwise I wouldn't have said "Yeah".
My bad, I figured that since I said he was still number 2, and then you said he wasn't number 1, 2, or 3, that you were responding to me.


__________________

Thanks to Advent for the Sig!

Old Post Aug 15th, 2008 10:24 PM
Click here to Send Darth Subjekt a Private Message Find more posts by Darth Subjekt Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Advent
Just Leaving

Registered: Apr 2006
Location: Gone With The Wind


 

A character's relevance to the "story" has nothing to do with this discussion, Gideon. Discarding the story aspect, he is - like Sidious - just a Force user at base, which makes a comparison perfectly valid between the two.

So what if he was young or had less training? He clearly possessed an extremely high potential and his training was dedicated to harnessing that potential into power (it's said that the focus of his training was to push his power to its full limitations). Again, I'll bring up how Exar Kun became immensely powerful in a few months without even having a master. It doesn't make him "overpowered", it just means his ability to learn, his potential, etc. are high in regards to the Star Wars universe. Like Kun, Starkiller apparently has the same traits (except he had a knowledgeable master, years of training, etc.).

And please stop mentioning the name "Skywalker", it's completely irrelevant.


__________________


"The ability to speak does not make you intelligent." - Sagacious Jedi Master Qui-Gon Jinn.

Last edited by Advent on Aug 15th, 2008 at 10:27 PM

Old Post Aug 15th, 2008 10:24 PM
Click here to Send Advent a Private Message Find more posts by Advent Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Gideon
Restricted

Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Your Mom.

Account Restricted


 

How so?

Palpatine's status was designed and accepted because he was the primary villain of the saga, the catalyst for the truly important events, the harbinger of destruction for the Jedi and the downfall of the Republic. Ergo, to do all that in essentially a one man show, he had to be the strongest and the smartest. Same for Anakin and Luke. It is the decisions of the power elite that direct Star Wars. If Luke and Anakin and Palpatine weren't designed for such particularly important purposes, do you honestly believe that they would have been written with such potency?

Old Post Aug 15th, 2008 11:08 PM
Click here to Send Gideon a Private Message Find more posts by Gideon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Advent
Just Leaving

Registered: Apr 2006
Location: Gone With The Wind


 

You would have to explain the reason behind Sidious' growth in power between ROTS and ROTJ in regards to the saga itself then. He didn't need to get any stronger, there was no necessity whatsoever - he had enough power to tear down any opposition at that point (including his apprentice). Therefore, Sidious is fair game.


__________________


"The ability to speak does not make you intelligent." - Sagacious Jedi Master Qui-Gon Jinn.

Old Post Aug 16th, 2008 12:01 AM
Click here to Send Advent a Private Message Find more posts by Advent Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Gideon
Restricted

Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Your Mom.

Account Restricted


 

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Advent
You would have to explain the reason behind Sidious' growth in power between ROTS and ROTJ in regards to the saga itself then. He didn't need to get any stronger, there was no necessity whatsoever - he had enough power to tear down any opposition at that point (including his apprentice).


From a narrative perspective, Sidious is the very personification of the dark side -- far moreso than any other Sith Lord -- as supported by testimonies from Count Dooku ("darkness beyond darkness", "black hole of the Force", "an event horizon", "beyond power"), Master Yoda ("...the birth of one strong enough to embrace the dark side fully and become its dedicated instrument."), numerous sourcebooks, the omniscient narrator of Revenge of the Sith, and George Lucas's own statement that Palpatine is the revenge of the Sith. Once he achieved his goals, why on Earth would he stop attempting to achieve power? For practical necessity, no, Sidious no longer needed to continue his study in the Force. But numerous sources make it clear: Palpatine was a grandiose, malignant narcissist. Speculation by Prince Xizor in The Mandalorian Armor is supported by the Dark Empire Sourcebook and the Dark Side Sourcebook: Palpatine's ultimate goal was to assimilate every last living organism into his being, stifle all life, until only he remained in the universe. The Galactic Empire was but the first step in an eternal plan for complete apoethesis. Thus his obsession with Luke and Anakin Skywalker. Two great Jedi with the potential to surpass himself in power; it wasn't enough to kill them, though he certainly could have. He had to dominate them in every aspect and to remake them into his own image.


quote:
Therefore, Sidious is fair game.


Fair game for what? Sidious's rise to power isn't being attacked because, for the purposes of the saga, he is supposed to be evil incarnate: powerful, seductive, intelligent. He is to embody all of those things, because he (not Exar Kun, not Marka Ragnos) is the bad guy. And unlike other characters, Palpatine not only embodies the "virtues of evil" (if there is such a thing) but also its vices. His is something that transcends arrogance. His narcissism is truly on cosmic proportions.

Old Post Aug 16th, 2008 04:16 AM
Click here to Send Gideon a Private Message Find more posts by Gideon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Advent
Just Leaving

Registered: Apr 2006
Location: Gone With The Wind


 

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Gideon
From a narrative perspective, Sidious is the very personification of the dark side -- far moreso than any other Sith Lord -- as supported by testimonies from Count Dooku ("darkness beyond darkness", "black hole of the Force", "an event horizon", "beyond power"), Master Yoda ("...the birth of one strong enough to embrace the dark side fully and become its dedicated instrument."), numerous sourcebooks, the omniscient narrator of Revenge of the Sith, and George Lucas's own statement that Palpatine is the revenge of the Sith. Once he achieved his goals, why on Earth would he stop attempting to achieve power? For practical necessity, no, Sidious no longer needed to continue his study in the Force. But numerous sources make it clear: Palpatine was a grandiose, malignant narcissist. Speculation by Prince Xizor in The Mandalorian Armor is supported by the Dark Empire Sourcebook and the Dark Side Sourcebook: Palpatine's ultimate goal was to assimilate every last living organism into his being, stifle all life, until only he remained in the universe. The Galactic Empire was but the first step in an eternal plan for complete apoethesis. Thus his obsession with Luke and Anakin Skywalker. Two great Jedi with the potential to surpass himself in power; it wasn't enough to kill them, though he certainly could have. He had to dominate them in every aspect and to remake them into his own image.





Fair game for what? Sidious's rise to power isn't being attacked because, for the purposes of the saga, he is supposed to be evil incarnate: powerful, seductive, intelligent. He is to embody all of those things, because he (not Exar Kun, not Marka Ragnos) is the bad guy. And unlike other characters, Palpatine not only embodies the "virtues of evil" (if there is such a thing) but also its vices. His is something that transcends arrogance. His narcissism is truly on cosmic proportions.


I certainly agree with your character assessment; as much is true. But that's all that was, Gideon. He didn't need to become more powerful, so I'd say that makes him "overpowered" by definition's standards.

But let me try the argument from a different approach: what you're saying for Sidious could pretty much be applied to Marek, as well. For the purposes of the game, Marek is supposed to be very powerful.

I just don't see how it makes sense to say Sidious is from the movie, therefore exempt. When discussing the EU, there really is no main villain since everything - including the entire movie saga - is a part of one history. Saying that Sidious is the bad guy of the entire SW mythos would be like saying Hitler was the bad guy of man's history.


__________________


"The ability to speak does not make you intelligent." - Sagacious Jedi Master Qui-Gon Jinn.

Last edited by Advent on Aug 16th, 2008 at 05:09 AM

Old Post Aug 16th, 2008 04:57 AM
Click here to Send Advent a Private Message Find more posts by Advent Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
NemeBro
Senior Member

Registered: May 2006
Location: Saving KMC


 

I really see nothing wrong with it personally.

I mean he is still less powerful than Sidious, as a suicide attack could not kill him.

So what if he is not in the movies, or even what would be considered a "main" character?

For the purpose of the game as Advent said, he had to be very powerful.


__________________
Thanks Scythe!

Old Post Aug 16th, 2008 05:14 AM
Click here to Send NemeBro a Private Message Find more posts by NemeBro Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Advent
Just Leaving

Registered: Apr 2006
Location: Gone With The Wind


 

Exactly.

And his suicide attack would've pretty much had to have been a desperation move, so it'd be likely he just wasn't powerful enough to overpower Sidious anyways.


__________________


"The ability to speak does not make you intelligent." - Sagacious Jedi Master Qui-Gon Jinn.

Old Post Aug 16th, 2008 05:19 AM
Click here to Send Advent a Private Message Find more posts by Advent Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Lightsnake
Senior Member

Registered: Dec 2005
Location: United States


 

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Advent
A character's relevance to the "story" has nothing to do with this discussion, Gideon. Discarding the story aspect, he is - like Sidious - just a Force user at base, which makes a comparison perfectly valid between the two.

So what if he was young or had less training? He clearly possessed an extremely high potential and his training was dedicated to harnessing that potential into power (it's said that the focus of his training was to push his power to its full limitations). Again, I'll bring up how Exar Kun became immensely powerful in a few months without even having a master. It doesn't make him "overpowered", it just means his ability to learn, his potential, etc. are high in regards to the Star Wars universe. Like Kun, Starkiller apparently has the same traits (except he had a knowledgeable master, years of training, etc.).

And please stop mentioning the name "Skywalker", it's completely irrelevant.


One could easily respond that Exar becoming that powerful in a matter of months, or Bane in an absurdly short time, is a clear case of author favoritism and plain bad writing all around. Introducing a new character or making one your own and essentially overpowering them to hell and back is not a new thing with Star Wars. Gary Stuism is pretty prevalent, really. And Starkiller is the latest for that. Revan is another because he allows the player to essentially be the most awesomely special Sith or Jedi of the Old Republic.

Say what you will about Palpatine, but he took what seems to be a somewhat decent amount of time to reach the plateau he got to. It's gotten old that every guy with a lightsaber and the writer's backing becomes a Force God practically overnight, surpassing everybody and their mother. Star Wars has grown filled to the brim with them.


__________________
Thanks to Venificus:

Old Post Aug 16th, 2008 05:19 AM
Click here to Send Lightsnake a Private Message Find more posts by Lightsnake Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Gideon
Restricted

Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Your Mom.

Account Restricted


 

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Advent
I certainly agree with your character assessment; as much is true. But that's all that was, Gideon. He didn't need to become more powerful, so I'd say that makes him "overpowered" by definition's standards.


I believe most of us define "overpowering", in the context of a character's relative level of potency, is when an arbitrary character demonstrates remarkable strength and mastery despite an incredibly young age, relative insignificance, and if his last name isn't Skywalker or Solo. Which, by those standards, Starkiller is. Though, again, I'm still psyched about the game and novelization. Starkiller tanking Palpatine's lightning isn't something that particularly disturbs me; it doesn't suggest equality or superiority. But it is unbelievable that he could achieve that particular level in such a short amount of time.

quote:
But let me try the argument from a different approach: what you're saying for Sidious could pretty much be applied to Marek, as well. For the purposes of the game, Marek is supposed to be very powerful.


And I have no problem with that. But despite a lackluster family, short lifespan, questionable training, it is illogical that he could be on par with the most powerful Sith Lord in history. Again, not that it matters, because he didn't necessarily stalemate or surpass the Emperor, which is what I've been trying to explain to everyone for weeks.

quote:
I just don't see how it makes sense to say Sidious is from the movie, therefore exempt. When discussing the EU, there really is no main villain since everything - including the entire movie saga - is a part of one history. Saying that Sidious is the bad guy of the entire SW mythos would be like saying Hitler was the bad guy of man's history.


I disagree completely. And it's not because Sidious is from the movie that he receives exemption. But let's be frank: LFL has made it 100% clear that the movies > EU. It's all the story of Anakin Skywalker, Luke Skywalker, Leia Organa Solo, Emperor Palpatine, and Obi-Wan Kenobi. Everything pre-TPM is just exposition and everything post-RotJ is falling action; ramifications. Hell, they even base their calender system around the Battle of Yavin. With respect to fine characters like Exar Kun, Darth Revan, Darth Bane, etc -- for their contributions were immense -- it's not their story. As far as the Sidious and Hitler comparisons are made, Hitler's the most infamous tyrant and mass murderer in history. He's the one that people are going to think of first. As far as Sidious, everything post-RotJ is directly tied to Sidious's machinations and ramifications of his victories and defeats. I'm not saying that because he's my favorite character, but Sidious isn't just "one of many". He's the primary villain, puppeteer, and shaker in the most important aspect of the SW mythos. By definition, he transcends all other villains in importance and projection. Making him the main villain.

Old Post Aug 16th, 2008 05:21 AM
Click here to Send Gideon a Private Message Find more posts by Gideon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Gideon
Restricted

Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Your Mom.

Account Restricted


 

I'm so tired and sick, we're going to have to continue this tomorrow. Good night Advent and thanks for the debate.

Old Post Aug 16th, 2008 05:36 AM
Click here to Send Gideon a Private Message Find more posts by Gideon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Advent
Just Leaving

Registered: Apr 2006
Location: Gone With The Wind


 

U

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Lightsnake
One could easily respond that Exar becoming that powerful in a matter of months, or Bane in an absurdly short time, is a clear case of author favoritism and plain bad writing all around. Introducing a new character or making one your own and essentially overpowering them to hell and back is not a new thing with Star Wars. Gary Stuism is pretty prevalent, really. And Starkiller is the latest for that. Revan is another because he allows the player to essentially be the most awesomely special Sith or Jedi of the Old Republic.


I can see what you're saying, but what I'm trying to get at is that authors/devs/Lucas really can't make a character too strong, since in the SW universe, strength is determined by your potential and learning capabilities. And neither of the aforementioned really have a defined point of being "overpowered".

quote:
Say what you will about Palpatine, but he took what seems to be a somewhat decent amount of time to reach the plateau he got to. It's gotten old that every guy with a lightsaber and the writer's backing becomes a Force God practically overnight, surpassing everybody and their mother. Star Wars has grown filled to the brim with them.


I definitely think the same, it's not like I don't become tiresome of the influx of all-powerful new (and in some cases, returning) characters. I think Jacen Solo would fit the bill here. Even though he was quite strong prior to becoming Caedus, it doesn't make sense he leaped up to the level where he could almost match Luke "The Grand Master" Skywalker.

@ Gideon:

quote:
I believe most of us define "overpowering", in the context of a character's relative level of potency, is when an arbitrary character demonstrates remarkable strength and mastery despite an incredibly young age, relative insignificance, and if his last name isn't Skywalker or Solo. Which, by those standards, Starkiller is.


His young age shouldn't really make him "overpowered" though, because his potential and learning rates are just extremely high, combined with his rather exhaustive training regime and teacher.

As I said, his relevance to the movie saga doesn't really matter since its just another part of SWs' history, like Marek's story is. We're discussing this with the EU in mind, so the movie saga loses its importance. And ergo, Sidious loses his immunity to "overpowered" persecution since he and Marek are in the same boat (see: the second quote you responded to).

And his last name is entirely irrelevant since "Skywalker" is just a bloodline.

quote:
Though, again, I'm still psyched about the game and novelization. Starkiller tanking Palpatine's lightning isn't something that particularly disturbs me; it doesn't suggest equality or superiority. But it is unbelievable that he could achieve that particular level in such a short amount of time.


I hope Microsoft sends my 360 back in time for the game's release, which they should. I got a nice gift that is known colloquially as the "RROD" or "Red Rings of Death" a.k.a. hardware failure. And I've heard sometimes it takes up to three weeks to return sometimes, but meh.

Since we're talking the game: I've read that it's supposed to give some insights into Vader's action during the OT, do you know if that has any truth behind it?

quote:
And I have no problem with that. But despite a lackluster family, short lifespan, questionable training, it is illogical that he could be on par with the most powerful Sith Lord in history. Again, not that it matters, because he didn't necessarily stalemate or surpass the Emperor, which is what I've been trying to explain to everyone for weeks.


It's not illogical at all since it can be explained. In Star Wars, characters are powerful because of their potential.

In Marek's case, we know he had a high potential and a training regime that literally pushed his power to its limitations to match (which would make one improve at a much higher rate than normal Jedi training). It's likely he had a high learning rate, too. So, how is it illogical for him to progress to such a level? Not all people need to gain power at the same rate Sidious did to become uber powerful.

quote:
I disagree completely. And it's not because Sidious is from the movie that he receives exemption. But let's be frank: LFL has made it 100% clear that the movies > EU.


But only insomuch as they're of a higher level of canon. Meaning they take precedent when it comes down to any contradiction that arises between them and the EU. They are not entirely more important in the grand scale of history (yes, they are an important event, but not necessarily a more integral part).

quote:
It's all the story of Anakin Skywalker, Luke Skywalker, Leia Organa Solo, Emperor Palpatine, and Obi-Wan Kenobi. Everything pre-TPM is just exposition and everything post-RotJ is falling action; ramifications. Hell, they even base their calender system around the Battle of Yavin.


It's hardly the story of a handful of people, Gideon. That's just absurd, is our history all about a few select persons? No, and the same thing would apply to Star Wars since the EU encompasses it as a whole.

quote:
With respect to fine characters like Exar Kun, Darth Revan, Darth Bane, etc -- for their contributions were immense -- it's not their story. As far as the Sidious and Hitler comparisons are made, Hitler's the most infamous tyrant and mass murderer in history. He's the one that people are going to think of first.


Yeah, but it'd be incorrect to say that he was the villain of history, since it was only during a certain era. I'd say Osama bin Laden or Saddam Hussein is the first person current Americans would label such now.

quote:
As far as Sidious, everything post-RotJ is directly tied to Sidious's machinations and ramifications of his victories and defeats. I'm not saying that because he's my favorite character, but Sidious isn't just "one of many". He's the primary villain, puppeteer, and shaker in the most important aspect of the SW mythos. By definition, he transcends all other villains in importance and projection. Making him the main villain.


I'm sorry, but I just can't agree with that. We're going to just have to agree to disagree on this point since - as I can clearly see this going -, we'll be arguing in circles.

EDIT:

No problem. Good night, Gideon - just let your mind Escape into the Advent of the dreamworld (lol).


__________________


"The ability to speak does not make you intelligent." - Sagacious Jedi Master Qui-Gon Jinn.

Last edited by Advent on Aug 16th, 2008 at 06:27 AM

Old Post Aug 16th, 2008 06:13 AM
Click here to Send Advent a Private Message Find more posts by Advent Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Lightsnake
Senior Member

Registered: Dec 2005
Location: United States


 

Re: U

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Advent


I can see what you're saying, but what I'm trying to get at is that authors/devs/Lucas really can't make a character too strong, since in the SW universe, strength is determined by your potential and learning capabilities. And neither of the aforementioned really have a defined point of being "overpowered".

Thing is, though, there's a point when potential and learning capabilities starts getting silly. That Bane can start basic training and become a Force God in three years pushes the bounds of credibility. Kun's turn to The Sith War Kun in...six months surpasses belief. Starkiller somehow having these reserves is just mind boggling.
quote:


I definitely think the same, it's not like I don't become tiresome of the influx of all-powerful new (and in some cases, returning) characters. I think Jacen Solo would fit the bill here. Even though he was quite strong prior to becoming Caedus, it doesn't make sense he leaped up to the level where he could almost match Luke "The Grand Master" Skywalker.

Jacen is sort of understandable. He was already second to Luke before his turn and the Dark Side does send you down roads. His intense power and level of study beforehand had at least been established to make him a credible threat when he turned. It was more 'Ooooh, look here, forbidden knowledge!"
And then, a month later, he's the greatest threat to the galaxy.


__________________
Thanks to Venificus:

Old Post Aug 16th, 2008 07:22 AM
Click here to Send Lightsnake a Private Message Find more posts by Lightsnake Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
REXXXX
Networking

Registered: Nov 2001
Location: San Diego

Moderator


 

For the love of...

THERE IS A THREAD FOR FORCE UNLEASHED.

It was posted in two days ago. Continue the discussion there or not at all.


__________________

Old Post Aug 16th, 2008 10:41 AM
Click here to Send REXXXX a Private Message Find more posts by REXXXX Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
All times are UTC. The time now is 04:28 PM.
Pages (2): « 1 [2]   Last Thread   Next Thread

Email this Page
Subscribe to this Thread
   Post New Thread  Post A Reply

Forum Jump:
Search by user:
 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON

Text-only version
 

< Contact Us - KillerMovies.com - Forum Archive - Forum Rules >


© Copyright 2000-2006, KillerMovies.com. All Rights Reserved.
Forum powered by: vBulletin, copyright ©2000-2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.