there are 2 types of easily distinguishable people, you are the first person in history to make these divisions and have clearly superior understanding through your subjective personal structure system than any theory supported by clearly unnecessary empirical facts.
so, just wondering, since your brain formed, and since you are only 19 is still forming, based on specific social and external influences acting on internal genetic expression, how are you able to remove the affects of these social influences when making decisions?
(blah, I feel this is an obvious gotcha, but I fear this will be like asking my "psychic" friend to describe the difference between conscious and unconscious thought...)
The, "though" in my post implies that my comment was intended as contradictory to your post. It wasn't. It was a quickly typed post only intended as insight. (I originally typed "incite" which would subconscious manifestation of the general thought of our current discussion. Neat how the brain works, isn't it?)
Once more, a lot of "i'm better than everyone" from Bardock42.
Does your girlfiend eventually want children? hmmmm?
By not thinking of how the world will see you by saying something that it may not agree with and by following whats logical to me. ive never followed social groups, and I have infact been in many so its not because ime an unsocial sort, I simply dont follow the standard view of those groups, infact ime part of several groups which is probably why I dont find it so difficult to block the social influence.
you have no idea what science is, let alone what it is capable of, let alone what is known through research. Making any statement about science is an admission of ignorance. You didn't know what an Independent variable was, you showed to have no clue what an experimental control is, you can't put together a coherent theory and have no idea how to define terms in ways they can be interpreted independently of your subjective worldview. You can be forgiven for not being interested or knowledgeable about such things, you cannot be forgiven for trying to speak as if you have any authority on the matter
oh, and btw, your theory is personal, as in referring to individual personalities, and not social
so you admit you have no idea what the implications of neuroplasticity are?
like, everything you described above would have developed in response to social influence earlier in life. Nothing YOU are is not a response to the outside environment. That is not how people work.
I think it is you who have no idea. Not knowing a few words that science would use does not mean I dont know what Science is. if you are suggesting you know what Science is and if your suggesting ime wrong nad Science can indeed classify people using its evidence then please show me what me, dadudemon and many others in this thread have presented to show how Socially people can become drones and often do.
Authority? you do not need Authority, you need common sense and free will, if you are one who requires a mathmatical formulae or scientific paper to understand something so simple then fair enough, but not everyone does.
Its not really individual as soon as it becomes an entire group of peoples and an entire cultural view in the long run.
Something can be scientfically executed, but you have the wrong end of the stick, I was saying he does not have any idea on what ime saying, in that so far, nobody in this thread has countered my post with science being able to work out who people are. it can work out "how" through looking at the brain, but no science knows everything which is obvious.
I dont care what you take or do not take seriously, you seem very young in the mind to think your sad swearing or your interest means anything to me, nor is it an intimidation, ive already got my own research material from you, and other people in the thread and most have shown what ime looking for even without trying...."dude"
Gender: Unspecified Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves
Well, I'd be really worried to turn up in a study as a "mindless drone", but since a prerequisite of being allowed to publish research is the ability to spell "I'm", I think I won't hold my breath quite yet.
Considering you've brought up sitcoms as proof and now you're using responses on this site for your "research", I shudder thinking what you're writing (considering you're not just a clown-shoe).
If I was interested in a spell check I would use it, since my own spelling does not bother me and anyone who actually has something interesting to input into this conversation would have my spelling as the last thing on their mind, then it does not bother me in the slightest....ime not interested in childish pickiness to try and prod and poke at every little detail especially when the "childish" character in question (you atm) has so far contributed very little.
This is the best and perhaps only way to conduct research on matters ime researching, you cannot find out what people really feel and how they react in a low social area, a controlled Guinea pig pig environment, this is the best place to see how humans react and they have shown it.
Gender: Unspecified Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves
I think he might be a bot, created for maximum ridicolousness.
Meh, just cause you are unable to detect the value in my contribution does not mean it is non existent. In fact, since you have a clear scheme of whoever agrees with you having something valid to add, and whoever doesn't, regardless of how much fact and logic supports their stance, is disregarded by you, again, I do not worry too much about it. You call me immature of mind, yet at least I have not a pre-determined belief. Nothing makes you better from those drones that you claim exist everywhere, but them choosing a more common understanding to follow, while you enjoy being obscure. Yeah, you are quite the rebel, kid.
KMC Community Forums
Oct 8th, 2008 09:34 PM
