Well, I don't think your opinion on it really matters. You do not argue with moderator decisions in public, end of story. If you are told to not do something, you don't do it, end of story. Breaking either of those rules is a bannable offense. If you've got an issue, you take it up privately. That's how it's always been on here.
Whoa. I love how gears is sayin I and Classic flame erbody even tho it aint true. I only flamed HIM cuz I knew it was HIM and I knew that I would get warned and that he would get banned.
Bison city vape ftw.
__________________ "Step back loser! Make way for the winner!" -Anakaris-
well, you never specified about "public and private". also if a mod is making a mistake whats the harm in everyone knowing? will the secret that s/he aint god get out? or will s/he lose credibility as a mod even though everyone knows that mod can be equally biased because everyone knows that they are just humanbeings?
or the fact that s/he might have to apologize is what really gets to you people? weird.
Mukai wins. took blows from the likes of the trinity without even being hurt bad>>running away from 13 girls
~Sado
Last edited by Sado22 on Nov 14th, 2008 at 05:46 PM
Read Accent Core's post on this page to see why the second ban was unlawful. Then again, you're probably partial about the situation and will deny the truth as usual: http://www.killermovies.com/forums/...;pagenumber=346
The third ban was beyond ridiculous...you should know very well that I asked why your order and GK's contradicted. After all, you told AC and I to stop arguing (don't think you mentioned reason) GK told us to carry it on in a civil manner (which I was, unlike flaming AC). Next thing you know...you guessed it...I was banned , by AC's BF, BackFire.
As long as the order makes sense, you're right. Except when the case is like ban #2, or when you tell only one to quit flaming when not only the other person is, but started it (in this case, Ush in his review thread) there's something terribly wrong.
Unfortunately, I doubt one mod here agrees with you.
Which is likely why my forum in the last few months have been flooded with KMC members, both refugees and people who were curious, to see what a forum (with mods who can do their job correctly ) is like. Of course, I am not saying every KMC mod is bad or partial. Certain ones are.
Which is sad. No wonder more are on my side.
Everybody? Did I say everybody? Sure didn't...I said you flame. Top of pg 4 is evidence of that.
....welcome to KMC, where mods are gods. To be fair in this matter though, KMC isn't the only site with similar mods. I've seen some on a Kingdom Hearts forum. Moviecodec forums has tons of tolerance, only it's packed with more fanboys KMC has ever had.
Last edited by Z3PZHK on Nov 15th, 2008 at 06:23 AM
WF, Accent Core was your sock. Of course it would be on your side.
Face it. You should have been banned long before you finally were. You constantly trolled and bashed people whenever you didn't get your way, argued non-stop, did not listen when you were told to not do things, and thought you could get away with breaking rules. Well, guess what. You break enough rules, you get banned. And you had an absolutely huge number of warnings. So deal with it.
And why you're not allowed to argue a mod decision in public? It's simple. If you're told to do something, you do it. If you think it's wrong, then you still do it, but take it up privately instead of turning it into a full-blown mess on the boards.
Not neccessarily. He could be going for the double blind hail mary debate tactic. It is a huge gamble but if pulled off correctly he could disagree with himself by making a stupid claim and cleverly refuting it as the other side and making him look like some intellectual debating god. I'm one of the only ones who pulled it off and survived. Perhaps you have heard of the infamous user Serious Famicom Hyper Duper Super Johnny 5 Omega Shenron of Elastic Dreams #382?
Wrong, we shared comps at one point. You should be able to tell as the way we speak is different.
Yet to prove what's in red. Correct, I did not listen to an order that was strange...like something along the lines of stop debating now or else, let me have the last word on the thread and take whatever you want to say to pms! Again, one of those rules that never existed on KMC.
I will say something you probably won't believe, but you can ask a certain person later about it.
First of all, not only was this ever an official rule, one would get banned either way. Ush and I pm'd after the argument in his review thread, and..what do you know..Ush threatened to ban me if I replied to his pm . So not only are the same mods spoken of are partial, some can be liars.
Close the thread as you please, as this belongs more in the off-topic forum than anywhere else. Decide to continue the argument, and it will eventually migrate there.
Last edited by 9K7E7E on Nov 15th, 2008 at 07:29 AM
No, this argument belongs exactly nowhere. Which is where it's going.
I do not have to prove a single thing to you. There are plenty of records of it and the other mods agreed that you had long overstayed your welcome. It's really that simple.
Not arguing mod decisions has always been a rule. Longer than I've been a mod, longer than you had been a member. Just because it's not written in stone does not mean that it's not an official rule.