All of the DBZ characters added are below Janemba. Like I said Janemba's speed outclasses them and swarming him won't do anything because he is much faster than them and more durable. Dabura Gohan Trunks and the rest of the Z-Squad gets stomped. Did you even watch the video link I posted?
Gender: Male Location: Khonaha Village
Dragonworld
Anti-
Your Making Janemba out to be a weak ass hollow.... The Gods themslves where terrified of Janemba, His power warped the Universe and YES i know sword fight, but Janemba created his sword by warping another weapon into it, plus if they where all to rush him at the same time it would be them who is overwhelmed not janemba, he cud send them all flying by merely flexing his Ki !!
Theres characters in bleach that have warped reality. There's characters that have abilities that are said to be unbreakable, unavoidable, and so powerful they burn through any object. And they've been shown to be so. Yet we're supposed to just assume that none of their powers work on janemba (and most of their powers are their swords so I'm assuming they get to use them)?
Janemba wins with one swing of his sword. One of those blade beams would slice through a majority of the Bleachverse, if not all, and probably the Z fighters.
__________________ -"My internet is currently so bad I'm time traveling. Don't worry about it."
-"You have the best problems, Scenario. You really do. haermm"
That's true, but it would have no bearings on the passive abilities of Janemba's sword. If he can't control when the beams come out, then unless he's using another sword, he would have them in his arsenal.
__________________ -"My internet is currently so bad I'm time traveling. Don't worry about it."
-"You have the best problems, Scenario. You really do. haermm"
Janemba has his sword which makes like a beam everytime he swings it. This is allowed because it an attack that his "sword" can do. Now as far as fireballs and teleportation, this is not allowed. So Bleachverse can do any attack as long as it is done with the sword ONLY.
But we assume the Bleachers can destroy the moon amirite!? Please stop using the absence of proof isn't proof of absence argument. Bleachers have never destroyed something near the size of the moon. We will not assume they can.
2. Nice strawman argument. Kicking someone through an island is far greater in terms of strength than anyone in Bleach.
3. Oh do they now? Consistently? And in the same fashion? Goku as a child also dodged lightning I believe, lightning travels at 60,000 meters per second, which is faster than ANYONE in Bleach.
4. Yes, a sword fight. A bunch of weaklings armed against someone who would not be scratched by any of them.
5. He was beaten by Gogeta's attack which bypassed his physical defenses and destroyed him from the inside out. And Zanpakuto have to physically kill the enemy to purify them.
Gender: Male Location: Khonaha Village
Dragonworld
Anti-
"sigh" All this fight is is giving Janemba 2 universes to play with !! the DBZ fighters together cud maybe put up an ok fight but the bleachverse is cannon fodder
The Z fighters get beat just as bad as the Bleach ones. No version of Gohan was at Janemba's level and Trunks was never a match for Gohan so he loses horribly too. Dabura gets stomped as well.
Gender: Male Location: Khonaha Village
Dragonworld
Anti-
I couldnt even see that working, Uusally in DBZ when someone is that much more powerful than someone stuff like that doesnt work, it wud just be Dabura spiting on Janemba
the guy who warped the room in on itself for one. And what makes what i said a fallacy? They say nothing can resist, nothing has. Yet we're to assume for some reason something can despite the on panel, on air proof? Also to the guys talking about him warping reality and stuff anyways....learn to read. Seriously. It's a sword fight. It says sword fight in the title. You don't say theres going to be an 1880 style duel between deadpool and the punisher then say punisher wins b/c he uses a grenade. Quit being dumb.
KMC Community Forums
Apr 24th, 2009 02:21 PM
Please stop using the absence of proof isn't proof of absence argument. Bleachers have never destroyed something near the size of the moon. We will not assume they can.
