KillerMovies - Movies That Matter!

REGISTER HERE TO JOIN IN! - It's easy and it's free!
Home » Comic Book Forums » Comic Book 'Versus' Forum » Relative performances vs 'Feats'/'Space cheese'

Relative performances vs 'Feats'/'Space cheese'
Started by: Philosophía

Forum Jump:
Post New Thread    Post A Reply
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread
Philosophía
"The devil made me do it"

Gender: Male
Location: Void

Relative performances vs 'Feats'/'Space cheese'

Yes, those are terms from herochat.

Now that we got that out of the way--

Which of these factors is decisive on your opinion concerning certain fights ? Say, is it more important how a character is viewed within the Universe he is from and his combat performances against various opponents, fellow heroes and villains alike, or if he has feats like.. smashing planets or going through black holes, which you take into consideration first and not his combat prowess against others (say he is not so great in this category) when he is put up against a character that, although doesn't have this kind of feats, is portrayed as one of the top characters in this Universe and thus effectivly winning the fight in your views ?

Beta Ray Bill seems to be getting more respect with his planet busting feats against an ill-defined character in terms of powerlevel compared to others, or Gladiator busting a planet more than a decade ago is brought in today as proof of him beating other characters, things like performances against the likes of Thor or Hulk being most of the time ignored in favour of 'space cheese'.

How do you (honestly) analyze the fights and why ?


__________________


“Perhaps this is the ultimate freedom. The freedom to leave.”

Old Post Dec 1st, 2009 08:11 PM
Philosophía is currently offline Click here to Send Philosophía a Private Message Find more posts by Philosophía Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
tideoftime
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: United States

Personally, I take multiple factors into consideration: character history, his standing in his universe, his relative interaction to others in his world(s), and how he conceptually compares with characters from other universes/settings. I also keep in mind that comics (especially) are a continuum and not fixed by any means; many characters have "high" and "low" interpretations - sometimes depending which book they happen to appear in, even in the same year/continuity, and cherry-picking is a major error in perception.


__________________
Why am I here commenting on this crap?

(Oh... right... geek...)

Old Post Dec 1st, 2009 08:17 PM
tideoftime is currently offline Click here to Send tideoftime a Private Message Find more posts by tideoftime Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
rotiart
Stan Lee Stole my name

Gender: Male
Location:

I apply relative performance in fights vs "feats"

ie... Let's say doomsday overpowers superman...
But doomsdays best strength feat puts him in the 200 ton range (whatever)
and superman puts him in the 300 ton range (again whatever)

I'd say doomsday is stronger or generally more powerful
cause superman wouldn't be "cheating" on hi strength feat by applying flight or speed... Etc...

If brb can consistently smash planets and manor cannot... But manor continually beats brb... I'd put Namor as the better overall...


__________________
Quotes from Hia8:
"I claimed that the science is sometimes faulty."
"You don't understand. This is fiction. That means none of this stuff really happened."
"There is no writer to purposely ignore a character's natural ability just because it suits the story."
"in some cases because the writer knows that Character A will dominate Character B easily and refuses to allow this to happen for the sake of the story."

Old Post Dec 1st, 2009 08:25 PM
rotiart is currently offline Click here to Send rotiart a Private Message Find more posts by rotiart Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Lord Feron
Senior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States

I don't believe someone would strictly use one way or another to argue everything. I believe the debator will use whatever means to put the character in a better light in order to win a VS.

Old Post Dec 1st, 2009 08:32 PM
Lord Feron is currently offline Click here to Send Lord Feron a Private Message Find more posts by Lord Feron Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
darthgoober
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Purgatory

Depends on the character and the situations he's been in. Doomsday didn't have much in the way of impressive feats outside of "killing" DOS Superman at first, but I'm sure people didn't read it and then argue with their friends that Supes could beat DD easily since Supes had more feats.


__________________

Old Post Dec 1st, 2009 09:24 PM
darthgoober is currently offline Click here to Send darthgoober a Private Message Find more posts by darthgoober Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Endless Mike
Sqirrel Girl fanboy

Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States

I consider feats unless they are completely out of context. For example, Hulk thunderclapping away Dark Crawler's dimension-destroying blast, Superman beating Dominus, etc.


__________________


Sig by Starlock

Old Post Dec 1st, 2009 11:21 PM
Endless Mike is currently offline Click here to Send Endless Mike a Private Message Find more posts by Endless Mike Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
KuRuPT Thanosi
Senior Member

Gender:
Location: United States

IMO I think more weight is towards how they are general viewed and considered by their peers. Feats are also a consideration and do carry weight to be sure. I guess for me personally I go more about how the character is perceived in his universe slightly more than busting planet feats.

Old Post Dec 1st, 2009 11:27 PM
KuRuPT Thanosi is currently offline Click here to Send KuRuPT Thanosi a Private Message Find more posts by KuRuPT Thanosi Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
rotiart
Stan Lee Stole my name

Gender: Male
Location:

Feat: batman got owned by darkseids oe... Superman did not...

:-)


__________________
Quotes from Hia8:
"I claimed that the science is sometimes faulty."
"You don't understand. This is fiction. That means none of this stuff really happened."
"There is no writer to purposely ignore a character's natural ability just because it suits the story."
"in some cases because the writer knows that Character A will dominate Character B easily and refuses to allow this to happen for the sake of the story."

Old Post Dec 2nd, 2009 12:21 AM
rotiart is currently offline Click here to Send rotiart a Private Message Find more posts by rotiart Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Zeuodin
Restricted

Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States

Account Restricted

One should look at space feats, area effect feats, Battle feats, context, character, history, CIS, PIS, Jobber effect and who else has fought the same character to make a reasonable assumption of victory. Herculese has never fought Gladiator to my knowlege. But based upon Glad's fights with Thor, and Thor's fights with Herc, one can get an approximation of how Herc would do. Thor was using high reflex speed, strength, his hammer and all sorts of tricks while He doesn't use nearly that much to stalemate Herc. Herc has next to no battle effect feats on his own. So then we look at his fights with people who do have battle effect feats. Like the Hulk. We also look at the character's powers and source and implied power.


__________________

Old Post Dec 2nd, 2009 12:28 AM
Zeuodin is currently offline Click here to Send Zeuodin a Private Message Find more posts by Zeuodin Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Kris Blaze
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: The Vega System

Account Restricted

Why you gotta bring up Herochat?


__________________


I give you the only thing an Orange Lantern gives....Demands

Old Post Dec 2nd, 2009 12:29 AM
Kris Blaze is currently offline Click here to Send Kris Blaze a Private Message Find more posts by Kris Blaze Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
dmills
Centurion Prime

Gender: Male
Location:

I'm bumping this because I recently was in a debate with someone that brought this up. Generally I try to take everything into consideration, showings, feats, portrayal etc. There isn't really one that necessarily overrides the other. Space cheese is generally used as a setting in comics where ultra powerful characters can really cut loose and do things that perhaps they wouldn't do in an Earth setting. Though imo it all evens out at the end of the day.

Last edited by dmills on Aug 4th, 2011 at 09:51 AM

Old Post Aug 4th, 2011 09:41 AM
dmills is currently offline Click here to Send dmills a Private Message Find more posts by dmills Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
All times are UTC. The time now is 09:39 AM.
  Last Thread   Next Thread

Home » Comic Book Forums » Comic Book 'Versus' Forum » Relative performances vs 'Feats'/'Space cheese'

Email this Page
Subscribe to this Thread
   Post New Thread  Post A Reply

Forum Jump:
Search by user:
 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON

Text-only version
 

< - KillerMovies.com - Forum Archive - Forum Rules >


© Copyright 2000-2006, KillerMovies.com. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by: vBulletin, copyright ©2000-2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.