Good point, Gandalf the White would just assplode Voldemort's wand since he's the greater wizard with many lifetimes of experience
If you actually watch the clip, both Legolas' and Gimli's attack would have struck true. Potter wizards make a shield to block arrows in a given area, iirc. That's far different than what Gandolf did, slapping aside two attacks with his staff while using pyrokinesis. Of course all you have is trying to undersell Gandalf's epicness.
He can't fly kill with a magical spell like Voldemort, etc.
Gandalf had his staff destroyed. The only staff he destroyed was the one he replaced in the order as the new White.
Blocking an arrow is nothing extraordinary but to Gandalf it somehow becomes legendary. Save it. Umbridge craps on that feat and doesn't have to shine bright light to addle their vision.
This is the same guy who has thrown pine cones while hiding up a tree from a small band of orcs and monsters. This is your epic wizard.
You're the one that brought up 'more powerful wizards exploding staves'. Don't cry now that it was turned against you. Incorrect again, Gandalf also recreated his stave after the Witch King destroyed it, watch the film already; preferaably the extended version.
To you anything Gandalf does isn't "extraordinary", it's your only tactic here. Downplaying.
Gandalf the White > Voldermort. Deal with it already.
Voldemort is too formidable to be beaten here by Gandalf.
Well, we can't ignore Gandalf's words now can we ? He destroyed Saruman's staff. Witch King also destroyed Gandalf's staff. Gandalf can't recreate it in battle nor did he against the Witch King. The bias runs deep in you.
Gandalf's hand to hand fighting against the Balrog was but his wizardry powers are sorely lacking.
Note that literal flash step at 1:30. Also, movie Sauron seems a lot more hardcore in this form than I recall in the books. But book Gandalf would crap all over his movie self anyways.
What are you talking about, watch the extended cut of the film already. Regardless, what is your point, that Voldermort is going to break Gandalf's stave with a word now as Gandalf did to Sarumon?
Another ascertain stated without proof. On the other hand, we do see Gandalf break a magical stave with just a few words; he could likely break a skinny little wand that some kid can break by accident by just burping.
More of your A-B failed logic. Superman is weak to Kyptonite, by your fail-logic Khan can defeat him because Khan isn't weak to kryptonite.
You have yet to show how. Gandalf the White has a great record, you should watch the films and stop using just the lowest feats from his 'Grey' incarnation. ie stop being a biased clown
Amazingly lame logic. Did you also forget that there were shitloads of other wizards attacking the shield as well over Hogwarts? Just like you to ignore that and try and give your precious all the glory; not on my watch.
If you set Voldermort's robe on fire, he'd notice too. But the Witch King isn't in this match.
He didn't lose to the Witch King, as they didn't really fight. They were about to fight, but it never happened.
We go with highest feats here, otherwise we have no base. You know this, since you always insist on going with highest feats for your favorite, while insisting the person you want to see lose go with their lowest. Otherwise Voldermort got his ass handed to him by a student-wizard who Gandalf would wreck and that's that. Check to the mother****ing mate, kid. You tried
That even goes to show how utterly astonishing the feat truly is. Hundreds of wizards didn't do it but Voldemort did in mere moments. That is how powerful he is
Voldemort can merely gesture fire away and he isn't letting some foolish warrior do so in the first place.
Witch King rendered Gandalf impotent and left. By your logic Gandalf never defeated Saruman.
No, we go with all showings. Only selecting certain showings implies bias and cherry picking.
Harry had Dumbledore save him along with various adults the entire saga. Voldemort did defeat Harry, Harry also fled from Voldemort which counts as another loss, etc. At this point it is obvious you never even saw the films. Weren't they released in your small country ?
It seems you forgot to watch the last movie clownchi . In the 7th movie Voldemort fails to kill Harry and dies a pathetic death....again outsmarted and defeated by teenagers...
Voldemort defeated Harry. I never said he killed Harry. Does the word defeat and death mean the same thing in your mini country ?
Harry had help from an entire army and a lie to keep him save from Malfoy's mother. The English language must be quite difficult to someone from your village. Shame.
KMC Community Forums
Dec 30th, 2013 09:16 PM
