Why would anyone run around with not at least one concussion or flash? Stupid.
Not from what I see. I always do better in HC. Why? Dunno, guess some people are better when there is no permanent radar involved.
Lol wut? The FAL takes two shots to kill in core. SMG's take 3-4 to kill in Core. The B23R kills with a three round burst in Core.
Hardcore? Look:
Dude is using a suppressed PDW and at 1:01 he gets a one shot kill. Right after, he gets a two shot kill at farther range. You can tell by the hit markers. First kill has one hit marker, second kill has two hit markers.
It makes camping easier, dude. You can't tell where campers are with no radar.
No, that's exactly what I told you earlier, to the letter.
And when there is an XPx2 event, they play twice as much.
There was a guy camping in the washateria on Slums the other day. He got me twice, then I finally got him. As I exited the room, he killed me from behind. ****er had laid a tac insert in the corner. So I go back to the room, flash it, kill him, then go outside and aim through the door waiting for him to pop up again. He did, laid a tac insert, I killed him. He did this like 6 times in a row and I killed him every time, lol.
Why would anyone run around with a wasted slot on concussion grenades? Stupid.
Again, these are lies. You've told me otherwise.
Couple of things:
On average, it takes 2-4 shots to kill someone in hardcore, depending on the gun. You can get weapons that have really high damage that will kill someone in 1 shot like a sniper rifle or shotgun. Any LMG or SMG will not 1-hit kill, period, in HC unless you make a headshot. Here is how the damage works: limbs talk half as much damage as torso shots. So if you shoot someone in the arm 4 times with, say, the MSMC, it will take 4 shots. With the HAMR, with FMJ, it will take 2 shots.
Also, in your video, it took 2 shots. Also, if you believe it took only 1 shot, then we can assume that person had taken damage already rather than the fail idea that a PDW can one hit kill, non-headshots, in HC.
Yeah, who ever heard of watching what was on the screen and listening to direction of sounds.
Sure, later, after you contradicted yourself, you then started singing a different tune. Doesn't matter what you say: you've already said you got your ass handed to you many games and you said you could not run and gun like you usually do so you hated playing HC. No matter how many times you lie about it, now, you're stuck with admitting that to me in the past.
To stun enemies? For room entry? I carry at least one concussion on each of my classes and it always pays off.
Sure I did.
Not 4. Where do you get this info? 1-2 most of the time.
The vid I posted is full of the guy getting 2 hit kills with an SMG, babe. And not all of them are headshots. What we see>>>>>What you think.
Is that right, Treyarch? Link to prove this.
First kill was one shot and there was no one near the guy, he was at full health. Second was a two shot kill, same thing.
You do know that if someone is camping, staying still in Blackops 2, that they show up on radar? Even if wearing Ghost?
I told you that my play is inconsistent. I'll go 20-1, then turn around and go 6-10. Then a 30-10, then a few games later 10-17.
On HC, I told you that once I realized there is more camping, I slowed down my playstyle and did better. The "ass handing" was when I ran around like an idiot.
Oh God, stop talking. You know nothing of Blackops. Hell, you don't even know the names of the maps or the weapons. You didn't even know what a wild card was last time we talked.
What a waste: all the space and you could have used it for something more useful.
I accept your concession.
Try it. Get someone from your clan to allow you to shoot them in the arms or legs. Grab an average sub-machine gun (not one with high attack). Be sure to put it on select fire. Then watch as it takes 4 shots to kill the person. Enjoy being wrong.
I only have experience which is obviously correct and yours wrong.
I said 2-4 shots.
You said:
"HC is not harder as far as skill goes, in fact it's easier. Why? Because it takes only one bullet to kill instead of 3-4."
To which I replied:
"It takes 2-4 bullets to kill in HC."
No you: I have experience and your video proves me right and you wrong. You already proved yourself wrong. No need for me to do anything else.
Prove that the guy had no damage. Oh, wait, you can't.
You do know that when I use ghost, I run around the map, constantly, so that Ghost works, right? Oh, right, you did know that. But you're pretending I said I do something I don't and you pretend I camp the whole time I play because I have a better Kill to Death ratio than you. Jealous and mad, bro? Don't worry about making yourself feel better: I'm just a better player...pretending I camp doesn't change that.
No, you told me that you consistently got your ass handed to you in HC and whined about the radar. Then you changed your tune when I reminded you that you were getting your ass handed to you. Magically, you improved vastly and hardly ever dropped below 1.0.
Now you're saying you vary wildly. So which is it? That you owned, got your ass handed to you, owned again, or varying all over the place? You have 4 different versions, now.
Yeah, you told me that after I told you to stop running around like an idiot. You tried to pass it off as your own idea. Don't remember raging at me because I said I camp like a mo-fo on Yemen? Yes, yes you do remember because you brought it up in the thread earlier by saying I camp with a target finder.
And we are back to another version: you now admit that you got your ass handed to you.
Just because I have a mental handicap (name blindness is a real condition) does not mean I know nothing. Now I am an expert. I accidentally committed the proper names to memory and I can be considered an expert.
Go ahead: test me. You'll find that you won't be able to stump me on the weapons, maps, or perks.
Anyways, after playing the game some more, I've stayed away from FFA and TDM. It seems campers are more prevalent there (at least for me). Sticking with objective playlists for now. While there are still campers here and there, is not as bad.
__________________
"A lie, Mr. Mulder, is most convincingly hidden between two truths." Deep Throat.
I love Free For All. I do the best, there. I don't camp, either.
My aim really sucks because using a joystick to aim is ultra unnatural for me. But the only advantage I have is getting the drop and reflexes...so I do better in FFA than all other game modes.
Debate time: is it cheating to use a keyboard and mouse? I was thinking about getting the XIM or whatever thing because my aim sucks so bad with a controller. I am primarily a PC gamer. Some say that you should use whatever is the most natural for you. Some say you should use the tool that game was designed to use. Personally, I feel my aim sucks so bad that it would not give me an unfair advantage over the other players. Instead of 12-16, I would be 16-12. At least I think that's the case. I notice I lose almost all gun duels (where both players see each other at the same time...roughly...and start firing). This tells me I am a disadvantage because I am used to aiming with a mouse. I played a lot of Skyrim, Fallout 3/NV, and Borderlands. Many many many hours on those 3 games on PC. My aim...just does not work unless I have a mouse.
It's just as much a "cheat" as me using a joystick for Star Wars: The Old Republic because I'm more comfortable with a controller than a mouse and keyboard.
It's absolutely not cheating. Anyone who gives you shit about doing that is just a poor sport making excuses. They have the same options of using a keyboard and mouse as you do.
I really wish I could do the same thing with PC's tbh, I would if I could.
I'm way better with a controller than I am with a mouse on shooters, so I'd like to use one of those PC 360 controllers when I play Planetside 2 and stuff. The problem though is that, from what I understand, controllers only work on the console because of the aim assist- turn it off and your reticule's going all over the place. So since PC versions of games don't have aim assist, I wouldn't gain much of an advantage. Conversely though, you can turn off aim-assist on most console games, so if you're better with a mouse I say go for it.
edit- Not really relevant, but my Dad has the same problem- he sucks with a controller, lol. The problem is that he sucks with a mouse too, he prefers to play with joysticks, and that's so outdated that he ends up just not playing games much anymore. LOL
__________________
"The Daemon lied with every breath. It could not help itself but to deceive and dismay, to riddle and ruin. The more we conversed, the closer I drew to one singularly ineluctable fact: I would gain no wisdom here."
That was my justification, as well. Some people play PC games with Xbox 360 and Dual Shock controllers. They feel more comfortable using those and they do better on the PC games with those.
I thought about that. That is probably why they give me shit...they just fear losing the advantage they have over me: tens of thousands of hours in FPS games playing with the Dual Shock or 360 controllers.
Thinking about it...I may very well have thousands of hours logged on PC FPS type games. Also, if you consider all of the 90s...
you have to consider game franchises like Wolfenstein, Doom, Blake Stone, and Hexen.
I did log tons of time on Goldeneye 007 on the N64...
__________________
Last edited by dadudemon on Jan 13th, 2013 at 10:12 PM
KMC Community Forums
Jan 8th, 2013 03:00 PM
Also, if you believe it took only 1 shot, then we can assume that person had taken damage already rather than the fail idea that a PDW can one hit kill, non-headshots, in HC. 
