There are no "teams" here. It's quanchi112 making up stuff/lies and everyone else going "No, that's not true; here's the proof" and then he does flips, lots and lots of flips.
Be careful though, if you prove him wrong enough times, he'll get butthurt and obsessed with you, then he'll start demanding you send him pics and/or Skype with him. <--- This isn't a joke, it's happened
Gender: Male Location: Heavens of Mystic
The Birth Place
Quan chi. Let me put it to you bluntly.
Voldemort feared Dumbledore. The moment Dumbledore walked into the room the smile on voldemorts face disappeared. Then when he attacked he could never beat Dumbledore down even breaking off the engagement knowing that he could not defeat Dumbledore. Then when Dumbledore turned the glass into sand voldemort was flat out terrified. So what does that tell you. There is no proof that Dumbledore was afraid of voldemort as an individual.
That wasn't what we were talking about. You just brought it up to try to distract against the fact your point is ass
Done riding rob's nutz or are you going for another spin?
He survived as was his goal. Voldemort failed in his goal several times. Sounds like a loser to me
Ok, his Horcurux is interchangable with the man himself. Got it. So Ron killed Voldemort. Hermione killed Voldemort. Harry killed Voldemort a couple of times. Damn he really sucks
It was a battle of wills, Vold was found wanting. He lost fair and square
Nope, Dumbledore lost focus and the bubble popped. Voldemort was just lucky
We don't know if he would have been out of the picture indefinitely captured since he had many allies and supporters. You assuming he would have been out of play forever is just rampant speculation. It's awful.
I already explained the differences but go ahead and do your fanfic thing again.m
Proving he used it to magically break free from the water bubble. We see Dumbledore clearly needs to point his wand to keep the bubble intact. Do you grasp the films at all ? Serious question. Wizards use the wand for magic. It's clearly important.
Your stance is Dumbledore was stupid and allowed Voldemort to break free because he's a moron.
False. Her scenes were changed around all the time. She speaks for the books not the films. Clearly different. I cited differences and special features which addresses the movie versions supports these characters. Citing the books is agains the rules.
So now everyone had the knowledge and know how to create horcruxes ? The movies made it clear Voldemort manipulated a teacher to get the information and that he was a something even at that young age to be reckoned with. You saying this was no feat is just being delusional.
He was determined to take him on at this point. He even says as much. By your own
By your own account Voldemort is truly courageous since he fought him and his fear.
Voldemort was annoyed and decided to change tactics. Dumbledore then looked on in fear at his own helpless because he could not magically protect Harry.
You said he was protecting Harry and I said he was in another situation with the same methods. Kill who is after Harry. He failed to kill Voldemort. Undeniable.
You are just like him. Pitiful.
A piece of him. The others were inanimate objects but not Nagini. A piece of his soul was in Nagini so like I said Voldemort killed him.
Context. Continue to act like a child because you were unaware Nagini was a horcrux or what the term meant.
Harry resisted. Dumbledore lost the battle of wills when Voldemort broke free from the water bubble. Voldemort won. Juggerman 101.
False. Voldemort used his wand to break free and Dumbledore knew it so he knocked Harry back right after Voldemort did so. I am ****ing amazing.
Gender: Male Location: Heavens of Mystic
The Birth Place
Alright quanchi. I've watched the special features. Now there are some things wrong with this you trying to pull that off.
1. That lady was not the author
2. She quoted from the book. A quote that can be translated in many ways and if it has one definition it means that Dumbledore doesn't delve deep into the dark magic like voldemort does. So when she said that she based it off of that line. That line is true there are powers that Dumbledore will never have, because he doesn't want to. There is a difference between having and understanding. Dumbledore no doubt understood that power just chose not to use them. He is a light sider, it's like yoda understands force lightning but just doesn't use it yet it doesn't make him less powerful than say Dooku who has powers yoda will never have. So you see that line is way to controversial as her opionion was stated by herself and never again by anyone else. Again saying that Dumbledore has said voldemort has powers Dumbledore will never have is not saying that he's better it's just saying that there is magic Dumbledore doesn't delve into as far as voldemort. It doesn't make him less powerful or anything. So you must now withdraw your Special Features argument as you now have absolutely no leg to stand on.
3. JK Rowling says that Dumbledore is the most powerful.
Continue to ignore your speculation. I for one don't think a captured Dumbledore would have been out of the picture for good. You can downplay him all you want.
Gender: Male Location: Heavens of Mystic
The Birth Place
1. Facts get over it. Voldemort was afraid.
2. Voldemort is voldemort I don't care about his courage as it doesn't detract from his skill so courage is not my area of concentration at this moment.
3. Annoyed or just couldn't win. Sidious was annoyed at yoda because he knew neither could overcome the other. Dumbledore was on defense the whole time except that one spell so we don't know what else he could have done and neither did voldemort that why he wanted to end it. Get over it. How does Dumbledore looking helpless help your case? That doesn't prove Dumbledore is less than voldemort or. Vice versa. That proves that Harry Can beat voldemort.
1. Your interpretation isn't a fact. Do you know what the word fact means. His own body language doesn't display fear at all.
2. Concession accepted.
3. He didn't have a lot of time and wanted to be gone before the others showed up. He changed tactics. That's all. Dumbledore shit his pants for Harry.
Sidious just had to survive and got the better of Yoda. p
No, Harry resisted him, Voldemort disarmed Harry which means he defeated him. That's a duel, dude.
Voldemort's feats, power, and legacy were far greater than Dumbledore. What resigned Dumbledore to death, again ?
Gender: Male Location: Heavens of Mystic
The Birth Place
1. How am I using the books. I simply said the person you gained your information from wasn't the author that was simply her opinion vs the word of the author. Rowling has supreme control over all Harry Potter and if she says Dumbledore is the greatest than that's the fact.
2. No it's not it's true. There is magic that voldemort will never have that Dumbledore has such as love. The most powerful magic of all. This is not speculation this is true. So does this mean your argument falls apart as the information you received was from the book. Since you say the books don't count does that mean that you have killed your own source as that's where she got her information from. Also this isn't speculation. If I say you have powers that I will never have that doesn't mean you are more powerful that just means you have worked In areas that I just haven't or practice a side of magic that I don't. Either way it goes that does not mean he is more powerful than Dumbledore so that leg of yours is gone.
3. JK Rowling is the queen. What she says is the law of Harry Potter. Dumbledore is the most powerful wizard.
KMC Community Forums
May 13th, 2015 11:54 PM
