And Voldemort was aided by Harry himself but decided to foolishly disregard the warnings and then lost to a child. A child. A CHILD!
FACT: That wasn’t the point. I’ll help you out here. A grown man attacking a baby is not a fair fight.
FACT: Harry was exhausted from the tournament and being tortured, yet still stalemated the more powerful Voldy long enough to escape. Again not a fair fight.
FACT: Harry was still spent from everything he endured earlier. And true to form, Voldemort ONLY showed himself once Harry was drained.
FACT: Harry won eve tho he sucks at Occlumency. And he was weakened.
FACT: Have to go back and look. The post is a year and a half old.
FACT: He lost them due to mostly children destroying them. Harry was tired unless you foolishly believe everything he went thru that day didn’t affect him.
Prove crucio affects the undead.
Also my offer stands:
__________________
"I'M THE JUGGERMAN B!TCH"
Last edited by juggerman on Dec 11th, 2014 at 07:05 PM
I remember now! Voldy tried to kill Harry during the chase scene in the beginning of DH1. I forget what KO'd Harry but Vold tried to kill him and Harry's wand countered on it's own. Yet another example of Voldemort's idea of a fair fight.
Harry fled though so that is a loss. Lucius's shitty wand broke. Voldemort always wanted a fair fight against Harry. Harry had others change themselves into Harry's in an attempt to elude the true dark lord.
It is never too late to respond to a post against the dark lord.
Yes, a new bidy was created but he lacked experience with it. He went right into battle despite being experienced with a body for years.
That was the entire point of being immortal. Immortal doesn't mean slightly longer life. Living forever means without end.
No, you said they needed wands. They don't. It greatly focuses their magic but they do not need a wand to enact magic.
How does it kill my claim ?
Due to them being polar opposites. Harry's love is what drove Voldemort away or out. He viewed love as weakness so his age was irrelevant. Dumbledore strengthened Harry by coaching him to resist the possession.
Voldemort wanted him dead without mercy. He was coming for Harry regardless of age. He later wanted Harry by himself. He would not let other Deatheaters kill him when he easily could have.
Voldemort was without a body and Harry was not exhausted. He did not pass out by any means. He fled. Voldemort also released him from the tro tire of Crucio and let him pick up his wand to have a fair duel. Voldemort was more than fair.
Voldemprt showed himself after he was resurrected in his body. He was a baby type body thing prior to so why would he show himself ??
Harry resisting isn't winning. Winning is defeating your opponent. Voldemort stood over him. Voldemort disarmed him which is also by wizards standards a legit win in a duel. Dumbledore came to his aid. Undeniable.
Dumbledore through prep along with Snape aided the kids in getting the objects they needed in order to do so. You want to ignore the massive prep and the wise adults aiding them to say, kids dude. That is ignoring the evidence. Voldemort scared the shit out of the entire wizarding world which consisted of adults. Voldemort also had a new body he was inexperienced in. You exaggerate.
Magic affects Imhotep. If you believe he can resist then prove it.
You have not proven me wrong at all. I am built for the long haul. You aren't. We both know how this will end. Do yourself a favor and bow out.
There's no proof that Crucio would even work on an undead being. Not to mention that this guy took far worse punishment, so it won't stop him. Then there's the fact that Imhotep's raw magic power vastly out strips Voldemort's.
If you feel he can resist the spell then the onus is on you. The spell clearly works therefore those who disagree need to prove it. That is how debating works, meathead.
Voldemort is clearly more powerful than Imhotep. It isn't even close.
KMC Community Forums
Dec 11th, 2014 06:59 PM
