quote: (post)

Originally posted by ares834
And you know this for a fact how?

quote:

The bigger play for this $160M production +$110M P&A vehicle is overseas. Global B.O. currently stands at $286.1M with 55% coming from China. Industry sources tell Deadline that breakeven is at $500M worldwide.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Zack M
prove it.

At least Tarzan is looking to have a bigger domestic total and weekend.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Zack M
Here is an excellent article and it actually shows an example where a movie is a hit, yet sees loss at the end of the day. Harry Potter actually cost them 167 million dollars. They actually show you the copy of the report. Robtard should be interested in this.

The highest profile example of a film that bombed in the U.S. but made tons of money overseas was The Chronicles of Narnia: Voyage of the Dawn Treader, which made only about $100 million domestically but made about $270 million overseas. And a similar thing happened with the previous Narnia movie, Prince Caspian. Another big film that made way more money overseas than domestically was Terminator Salvation.

So if a film does incredibly well overseas but flops in the U.S., does that make it a hit? As with everything else to do with box office, the answer is "it depends." But generally, domestic revenue seems to be be better for studios than overseas revenue, because the studios take a bigger cut of domestic revenue.

http://io9.gizmodo.com/5747305/how-...o-be-profitable

quote: (post)

Originally posted by quanchi112
You really have Golgo's number.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Zack M
That doesn't change the fact that domestic holds more weight. And that Legendary might need to go to a different studio to make a sequel, seeing as it bombed in the states. Warcraft still needs to collect 500 to break even and China alone isn't a guarantee.

How much does Legendary even get?

quote: (post)

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
the film cost $180 million to make dummy.. even deadline hollywood reported that the money its's going to make this weekend isn;t going to be enough..





jeez where was all this during Batman V Superman.. of course that was a huge FLOP...







even if true, which I doubt.. Warcraft most likely will.. unless you have proof that the film isn;t going to to make any more money.. Beside Rob has already stated that the sequel has a name...

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Zack M
I never said it was going to be a success, idiot. I said it will have a bigger total than Warcraft in domestic.

BVS didn't make THAT much money in China, but it did do decently well domestic. Over 300 million. What did Warcraft make? HAHAHAAH! Not even 50 million.

You need to PROVE that it isn't true. Nobody is going to take your word, moron. PROVE it.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by HelloLove
WARCRAFT is a really good film, can't wait to see it again when it's out on digital. Love the game as well.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
calm down SHITTINGMYPANTIESBOY...


Remember Bats v Supes WAS A flop... Thats why the current changes.... hahahahahahahahahahaha... Warcraft is a success.. a sequel is happening and their isn;t a damn thing you can do about it except continually shitting in your panties and staying underneath the table of pedophile Campea..

Oh and tell us what other services you provide Hack Snyder after you burp him

quote: (post)

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
I doubt you've even seen it, tbh.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
That he did.

We should just start calling him as Bruce's suggesting.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Zack M
Warcraft still sucked and bombed. Don't forget that, Stilt.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker





nah, a sequel is happening and their isn't a damn thing you can do about it...also tell us why Legend of Tarzan isn't going to make a ton of money domestic but NEEDS the foreign box office in hopes to be a success.