^
I disagree. There should be no Dooku vs Anakin fights. Anakin should be inferior to Dooku, especially at the time of TCW Movie, Grievous should be better, Ashoka shouldn't exist as Anakin's pupil, and despite this, she should be less skilled.
Anakin and Obi-Wan should be a much better combo. Aaaand man! Bringing up Maul, and left us without him confronting Anakin? Or Dooku? Or even Mace? Kenobi vs Grievous/Maul and Anakin vs Dooku and Ventress all the time? The whole Jedi Council outsmarted by Bane in their own temple? All of this, only for what? For Ahsoka saving a day?
And battle of Cato Neimodia? Anakin saved by Tano during a ships battle? Really? Filoni is a pathetic, son of the bitc.. He's nothing compere to Stover/Luceno/Drew and Ostrander and c.o. Small piece of...
TCW could be a muuuuch better. Most of us, users of KMC would be better as directors of this show.
Registered: May 2007
Location: Best company on the planet
Your perception does not matter. I do not care what you posters think should and shouldn't happen. You aren't in a position to dictate canon. Accept it because otherwise you're just a crybaby fanboy living in his own world. This is why I'll always win.
Right. So what about that part where you said Maul was deceiving them into making them think he was weak...? I'm asking you directly about it now, so just stop trying to avoid it saying 'I misunderstand' or 'I missed the point'.
The fact that Maul thought he might eventually face Vader in no way proves the following:
1. Maul is above Vader.
2. Maul thinks he's above Vader.
3. Maul wouldn't avoid facing Vader if possible.
And I still have yet to concede shit to you and your shitty arguments.
The show doesn't need to point out everything for something like that to be pretty clear, and the fact that it's not explicitly stated doesn't mean much. There's even evidence and strong implications that Malachor is indeed a dark side nexus [both of which I provided above but you, yet again, conveniently ignored or dismissed without an actual counter-argument].
Lmao, you're pretty much the only one who believes Tano actually beat Vader, even with evidence stacked against you and you relying on a ridiculous cheap shot to declare her the winner, so I'm just really not going to bother arguing about this anymore with someone so mind-numbingly blind and so very much in denial. Hell, when the most loyal and arduous Ahsoka supporters [Joker and Beni] accept Ahsoka lost to Vader, you're left with absolutely zero credibility.
You know what means worse for Maul? The fact that Ahsoka managed to duel him on even grounds in spite of the fact that they were fighting on a dark nexus. Regardless of how Vader did against Ahsoka, Maul couldn't manage to get the upper hand over her despite the advantage. What do you have to say about that? You're just using Vader's performance as a scapegoat for how Maul fared against Ahsoka. Let me tell you something everyone already knows, and that you keep denying: Vader did better against Ahsoka than Maul could ever hope for.
Oh and keep calling me biased, you only further embarrass yourself.
So delaying her means pushing her back, outdueling her and TKing her off the temple? Because, according to you, in no way does that demonstrate some sort of combative superiority over her, right? Oh yeah, that's right. The cheap shot = Ahsoka beating Vader.
God.
Guess who also has precognition, distance between them and a dark side nexus on his list of advantages against Kanan? Guess who was slow to react against Kanan? Let me give you a clue. His name starts with M and ends with aul.
When a definitive win to you = a cheap shot from behind, then it's very clear whose logic is faulty as ****.
I'm not going to go there because Zen already destroyed this idiotic argument in one single post, though.
Are you talking about when a blind Kanan pushed him off the Temple, or when Padawan Kenobi cut him in half?
The fact that he wasn't injured speaks of Maul's toughness and physical resistance. It has absolutely nothing to do with the actual duel.
It's already been established now that you use a fight's context to your convenience, but I'll gladly point it out again:
Kanan was as good as dead without Ahsoka because Maul blinded him via cheap shot. Kanan's defenses weren't even up, his lightsaber wasn't even ignited. Him blinding Kanan counts for nothing in Maul's favor. So Ahsoka intervening is irrelevant.
ROFL, this has got to be the most pathetic argument I've ever read coming from you, and that's saying something.
You're becoming desperate. It's hilarious.
(please log in to view the image)
Last edited by Petrus on Sep 26th, 2016 at 07:13 PM
Registered: May 2007
Location: Best company on the planet
So a well trained guy with years of experience can't handle some exploding walkers against two novices. I accept that. Vader was overwhelmed in that scene. He gets distracted a lot, apparently.
Registered: May 2007
Location: Best company on the planet
I am saying he wanted to give them a false sense of him needing them to relieve their apprehension.
1-3. I never said it did. I said it wasn't proof Vader is above him since the two have never met.
So you can't prove it and think an amp wouldn't need to be spelled out. If it isn't spelled out then chances are its baseless to say it provided a significant amp. If you make the claim the onus falls on you not me to disprove your horseshit. You seem altogether confused about the fundamentals of debating.
Do not misrepresent my arguments. I said Tano got the better of. No one was definitively beaten. I don't care what any Tano supporters say. You may be fooled into thinking the popular opinion must be right. I go by the evidence. Look at what occurred to both and tell me who was better off at the end of the day ? I guarantee your answer will be Tano. Some of the jackasses on here thought she was dead.
That is a baseless claim and one you hypocritically insist on degrading Maul for while sidestepping for Vader. They didn't fight for the same time period. Vader was struck in the face and damaged., Vader managed to force push her. Who cares ?
Speculative, biased nonsense.
He force pushed her. If you think that is a solid win despite no damage and according to you under a dark side nexus you're full of shit.
She inflicted more damage so I believe she got the better of him. There isn't some score card here in which a judge decides. You think a force push is greater than a face slash.
Yes, my son ?
Maul was overconfident and you haven't proven a dark side nexus. It's baseless.
Guess who already had him beaten until another force user got involved ? Starts with an M and ends with an aul.
No, Zen didn't. I destroyed him and other posters agreed.
Both instances are overconfidence,
Maul already had him dead to rights but Tano jumped in. That's relevant despite your girlish insistence it doesn't.
Kanan had his saber on him, he didn't defend himself in time. Point blank. So now precognition doesn't count and you want to ignore what happened. Sad. You ignore their abilities when it suits you and create false unprovable amps when it doesn't.
So you won't answer the question because you know I'm right. Gutless curr.
You have always been desperate. It's who you are that nerdy kid unable to ever land a date because he's incapable of social interaction.
Sep 25th, 2016 06:32 PM
