Better than the students supporting violence to stop speech that hurts feelings.
Are you an adult? Was that not obvious?
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
O.K. so do you feel there strong feelings and desire to act for change makes them inferior? Could it be, you just don't have a cause to act for offline?
Their thinking violence is okay to stop speech they don't like makes them inferior.
Why does an adult need to be told this? I'm genuinely curious.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
i think you'll find what people consider causes worth fighting for vary. What were they against? Hate speech? The propagation of ideas the dehumanised others? I didn't read it... i just picked up on you posting something to possibly feel superior based on your political bias.
Lol. If getting violent over speech u don't like is okay is it cool for a pro life person to bash in the skull of someone who is pro choice and giving a speech about it?
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Wars generally have rules against attacking non military targets though.
And I mean, how does tearing up where you live change anything? Kind of a pointless gesture, imo. You're supposed to wreck THEIR stuff, not yours.
__________________ What CDTM believes;
Never let anyone else define you. Don't be a jerk just to be a jerk, but if you are expressing your true inner feelings and beliefs, or at least trying to express that inner child, and everyone gets pissed off about it, never NEVER apologize for it. Let them think what they want, let them define you in their narrow little minds while they suppress every last piece of them just to keep a friend that never liked them for themselves in the first place.
I'm gonna burn down my house now in protest. F*ck youuuuu! I'm intelligent
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
They're crazy leftists, ffs. You actually expect them to act rationally?
__________________ Paleontologists have tried to turn Archaeopteryx into an earth bound feathered dinosaur. But it is not. It is a bird, a perching bird. And no amount of 'paleobabble' is going to change that.-- Alan Feduccia-a world authority on birds, quoted in "Archaeopteryx:Early Bird Catches a Can of Worms," Science 1994, p.764-765
__________________ Paleontologists have tried to turn Archaeopteryx into an earth bound feathered dinosaur. But it is not. It is a bird, a perching bird. And no amount of 'paleobabble' is going to change that.-- Alan Feduccia-a world authority on birds, quoted in "Archaeopteryx:Early Bird Catches a Can of Worms," Science 1994, p.764-765
If you think that rule gets followed I have a long history of dead civilians to show you :/
Also various degrees of violent protests have changed things before. The violent labor disputes in industry in the US showed some of that. There were the Stonewall riots.
The american revolution started with violent protests.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
The context here though is people supporting using violence to stop speech. We are not talking about something to stop actual injustice.
These are snowflakes on college campuses feeling that if they can't get someone uninvited from speaking that it's okay to resort to violently preventing them from talking, not revolutionaries. Though I'm sure they would call themselves revolutionaries, but if you call a pig a bird that won't make it fly.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Lol. Except it wasn't the speeches. Do not rewrite history.
Nobody said words do not have power, but no you don't get to violently prevent someone you disagree with from speaking.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
I mean first it took brainwashing a public enough to go along with the violence. To pretend the hate speech Hitler used didn't facilitate violence afterwards would be rewriting history.
Also I went back and looked at the survey that you guys were mentioning. It seems kind of flawed with the way the data is presented. It never actually mentions what types of speech would these students find worthy of violence and too what degree of violence they would resort to.
They never even classify what violence represents in this scenario. Is it tearing down signs. Occupying space to keep people away. Yelling at people. Or shooting people. Burning down property. What exactly constitutes violence here for these individuals.
I'm not surprised generic questions like these would lead to these types of numbers because if it's ambiguous enough you're going to get generic data that isn't as useful.
In the cases of freedom to express yourself. Once again we don't know why the individuals feel they can't express their opinions. Is because of threat of violence or anxiousness of having world views challenged or fear of being proven wrong.
So I would take this survey with a major grain of salt because the data is kind of unclear.
KMC Community Forums
Oct 4th, 2020 10:09 PM
10/10
