__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
That's splitting hairs, in my opinion. We can spin it and play word games with it just to make it all "promoting positive idea about this and that." It's an exercise I don't think is honest and I'm not willing to undertake that path of discussion.
Instead, I would prefer to focus on my point which is worrying too much about legally canonizing this line of speaking and acting or that line of thinking and acting. It's not kosher.
Gender: Male Location: The Proud Nation of Kekistan
Beni is literally saying people can deny expressing themselves in a way he finds reprehensible, but they can be forced to express something they disagree with as long as it aligns with Beni's views. I call him out on the obvious bullshit, and he throws a trademark evasive smiley at me.
__________________
Shadilay my brothers and sisters. With any luck we will throw off the shackles of normie oppression. We have nothing to lose but our chains! Praise Kek!
THE MOTTO IS "IN KEK WE TRUST"
Homophobia advocates for the encroachment on their rights. Its the advocation that these people should not be allowed to be in charge of their own sexuality. In the same way that saying "Black people should be slaves", it shouldn't be accepted in a position of power or in a professional sense imo.
I meant in the literal sense and not in the "well technically you can define it as force" bs sense.
Well, if you did not just strawman his point and that's legit, then, yes, that's a rather stupidass idea that has an absurd slippery slope to it.
Part of the reason why we have the bill of rights is due to this idea that there's just some rights we don't want infringed. If a person wants to be racist: let that person be racist.
We MUST take the bad with the good. I want two dudes to be able to profess their love for each other on the streets just the same as I want a racist person to be able to talk about how much he hates Irish people.
Similar to businesses: I want Joe to sell pro-homosexual sex toys and be happy about it (maybe even gay about it.yippeeee!) just the same as I want Jack Philips to be able to make marriage cakes for only heterosexuals.
Gender: Male Location: The Proud Nation of Kekistan
I mean I know people who find homosexuality morally disagreeable but think it would be wrong for the government to keep people from having gay sex or getting married... so not necessarily.
Refuse to cooperate and it comes out in the literal sense in a very real way.
__________________
Shadilay my brothers and sisters. With any luck we will throw off the shackles of normie oppression. We have nothing to lose but our chains! Praise Kek!
THE MOTTO IS "IN KEK WE TRUST"
They're allowed to be racist, just on their own time. Discrimination in the workplace should not be tolerated. Your personal views do not give you the right to discriminate based on bigotry.
If he fired his female employee for being female, that would fall under the legal phrase of "discrimination in the workplace." But denying making a gay-themed wedding cake is not "discrimination in the workplace."
Now this is the type of thing I could get behind (your butt...for the gay homsexual buttsex we would be having while eating our gay cake and watching our queer show).
__________________
Last edited by dadudemon on Dec 6th, 2017 at 11:00 PM
Not sure that's the issue exactly here, but you'd have no problem with say a Black couple being denied because they wanted a Black bride&groom represented on their cake and the baker was like "nope, I don't bake for no Blacks, just my beliefs"?
KMC Community Forums
Dec 6th, 2017 10:34 PM
