Dude, I can take a full punch to the shoulder without any signs of damage or fatigue. That does not mean I can take multiple punches without any injury.
A single lightning blast from Thor already knocked Thanos off his feet. IM's strongest hit was able to make Thanos bleed. Thor's lightning blasts have far better destructive feats than anything IM has.
If you want to claim that Thanos can tank repeated lightning blasts from Thor then you'll need to prove that, since he wasn't even able to tank a single one. Otherwise you're claiming a no limits fallacy.
Ragnarok bridge fight. Continuous lightning blasts from Thor. Avengers fight against the Chitauri, multiple times Thor used lightning blasts. Furthermore, not once have we seen Thor actually get tired from blasting out lightning.
Your turn. Before you ask anything else, please provide proof that Thanos can withstand multiple lightning blasts from Thor.
__________________
Last edited by FrothByte on Sep 28th, 2018 at 07:04 PM
1) You mean when their team effort had a legitimate chance of getting the gauntlet off him?
2) Urm no. He chose to grapple with Hulk instead of blasting him. If he did shoot Hulk right away, that would suggest Hulk rocked him fairly badly.
Again even Iron Man is able to injure Thanos. So its pretty silly to think Thors best Lightning blast will not do anything to him.
3) Funny because I do not remember him going toe to toe with The Destroyer. He started out his fights with both Malekith and IM from a distance despite them both being physically weaker than him.
Heck he attacked Thanos from the Sky in his final attack.
So you are the one creating a myth here that Thor WOULD NEVER fight like that. We have literally seen it.
Sure he likes to go H2H as well, but he isnt idiotic, and will strike from a distance when needed.
Sorry dude, but I already provided multiple answers to support my claim whereas you haven't provided even a single one. If I answer this question all you'll do is keep asking for more. So how about you actually provide something to backup your claim that Thanos can tank multiple lightning blasts from Thor?
Once you've provided some proper proof to back up your arguments then you can go back to cross-questioning my arguments again.
Thanos withstood a lightning from Thor without damage. That's enough evidence to doom your biased opinion.
And you haven't proved that Thor can remain on the air indefinetly. Ergo, Thor lands and Thanos grabs him by the neck and bitches him like he did in the beginning of infinity war.
What a dumb argument. You realize that just because you survive a first hit doesnt mean you can survive if you keep getting hit. The entire history of combat sports backs that up.
That argument would hold weight if Thanos was shown to be invinceable which he is not. Iron Man was able to damage him. If you don't think Thor could then you are even more ignorant than I originally thought
Your rock/wall analogy is flawed since the rock bounced off the wall and didn't make the wall fall down. Thor's lightning didn't just bounce off Thanos, it actually knocked him down. Any hit strong enough to knock you off your feet is not a hit that you can take repeatedly without injury.
You keep acting like Thanos completely tanked the lightning which wasn't the case.
So I'm still waiting for you to provide proof that Thanos can withstand multiple lightning hits from Thor.
A punch =/= lightning. They aren't comparable feats. They are different attacks. It's like saying a lasser attack can be compared with a lightning attack. lol.
Thanos already took a full lightning from Thor WITHOUT damage. He was moved, yes, but he was fine.
Again, can you bring evidence that a certain amount of lightning attacks can harm Thanos, or just your speculation.
Perhaps you are more of a Thor fanboy than I thought you to be.