First answer the question
For you to say that she will not do that means
1. She will not choose to do so even if she is capable
Or
2. She doesn't have the capacity to do it.
Per your own stated rules when debating with Nib, if you can't provide a feat where WW performs the exact tactic we are talking about. she can't do it.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
Nobody conceded, so you just proved you're a liar.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
My so called rules are irrelevant. Either she wins or not for the reasons given. It's about what you think is the truth, not my alleged rules. If you are going to debate then do so. Trolling is not debating. Arguing my character is a fallacy.
Again, wrong. rules are very important in a debate and by your own rules you have provided no evidence, thus there is nothing for anyone to refute. Until you provide evidence for your claim, it's worthless.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
It's not against her character to do so. She also can slice off limbs. That's a win too.
If someone has two ways to win then arguing against one of the ways is dumb. Why? Because it doesn't defeat the argument that they win.
You keep saying that, yet you've not posted a single feat to back it up.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
Are you suggesting Wonder Woman is against killing or against slicing off heads?
Either way, she has the ability to do both, and has done the former. Saying she wouldn't is saying she would purposely hold back doing something she clearly has the ability to do (provided there is an opening to do so, though if not, it would be contingent on the opponent's skill, not her lack of ability).
For example, I don't hit woman, but if we were to discuss a hypothetical scenario where I would, then, in most cases, I have what it takes to absolutely hurt her (unless the woman is someone like Ronda Rousey or Cris Cyborg lol).
__________________ "The power of the dark side is an illness no true Sith would wish to be cured of" -Darth Plagueis
KMC Community Forums
Feb 16th, 2020 04:17 PM
