So for instance, if a certain democrat presidential candidate was racist his supporters also would be racist?
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
That would only be relevant if your logic only applies to reddit. Is that what you are saying?
Going by your logic why would a toxic poster and his supporters be one in the same, but a toxic politician and his supporters not be?
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Surt's just trying to deflect away that he's voted for Trump twice now and what that means.
Going to be weird if the SC knocks down the ACA on Nov 10th and Surt loses his free insurance because of his own actions. I say weird, no, that's not the right word.
Oh son, this is not the road you wanna travel down.
And btw I love how holding you guys to your own standards is always a "deflection".
It must be awesome to literally never hold yourself to account in the way you hold others
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
I wonder in reality if Surt uses Insurance, you read between the lines and he has obviously been left some money. He also obviously works, he is also clearly not stupid. This demographic in Chicago would fit with many of his views and explain how he pays for things.
Nah, you really do not. You end up looking foolish.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
That's what they say but there's no violation of terms of service when they do this almost 100% of the time. You missed the part about automods autobanning people. They scripted it.
Yes, there are those trolls who try to incite hate but almost none of the bans are due to those very small and almost nonexistent posters. It's just blatant propaganda.
You call it a deflection, I call it seeing if you'll apply the rules you have created equally.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
You'll wish you had, but okay: explain why the logic used doesn't apply to politicians.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
I'm curious what you think about if Facebook is a publisher. Check the triggered thread for my response to you about what that oversight board is.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Surt, you clearly aren't though, instead, you are using ill-proven accusations in a ludicrous hypothetical situation and comparing them to DDM getting banned for posting his youtoob fringe ideas and some Reddit supporter of the alt-science world getting banned for supporting the fringe toxicity.
Didn't use to be that way. There was a significant volume of differing opinions. Now it is mostly the ultra-politically correct, radicalized leftists pushing communism, authoritarian leftism, or socialistic anarchy. The worst of the worst of leftists.
Pictures of meaningless and useless "people of color" get upvoted by tens of thousands. Just some banal caption and they get upvoted. Why? Because the moronic ultra PC idiots think they are super woke by upvoting a non-white person. "OMG! Look how woke I am by loving this! I'm so good!"
They are all publishers. I've posted this multiple times. They are only moving up the timeline of losing the historic case by making it much more obvious they are directly fit under the legal definition of publisher.
KMC Community Forums
Oct 22nd, 2020 10:29 PM
