__________________ "Happiness is a lie. Life is horror. The light is always dying all across the universe. The last star will flicker out someday, when it does, all that remains is shadow. And I will be its king!"'-Amahl Farouk
That's just more faulty reasoning. Might as well argue that Thor is incapable of firing an M16 rifle because we've never seen him explicitly do it. When logic tells us he could, should he want.
We know the Bifrost can be used as a weapon, as we've seen it used with the intent of destroying a planet and we've seen it cut the head off of a fire dragon. The Bifrost can be weaponized, no reason to believe Thor can't.
Actual showings >>>>>> hype or plot intentions that never actually occurred on screen
__________________ "Happiness is a lie. Life is horror. The light is always dying all across the universe. The last star will flicker out someday, when it does, all that remains is shadow. And I will be its king!"'-Amahl Farouk
Actual showings would be the Bifrost being used with the intent of destroying a planet. Other showings would be cutting the head off a fire dragon in Thor 3 and killing the Outriders caught in the blast in Infinity War.
The Bifrost can be weaponized, it was said so and shown first in Thor (2011).
Thor could also just fly through Godzilla's head with Stormbreaker, the weapon that nosold the full might of the Infinity Gauntet.
Or we are just not that easily impressed. None of those th ok ngs you listed are even remotely comparable to a creature that can tank the full force of a nuke bigger than a tzar bomb with its eyes open. And Godzilla's breath attack absolutely shits on the bifrost.
But hey Ol.Man Whirly how's this for plot since y'all failed to understand it.
If LEFT UNCHECKED the bifrost could destroy the outer layer of a planet. And going by the actual on screen video instead of letting your autism make up head canon it would take hours and hours for it to destroy anything.
But go ahead and throw out insults and be completely wrong at the same time.