Heck, Thor rarely gets KO'd. The two times I recall him getting KO'd was after the Sokovia explosion and after Hulk hit him with a flying/dropping fist after he had already been dropped by the Grandmaster.
In comparison, Aquaman gets KO'd by a grenade launcher and gets fried by Manta's eye beams.
The power of mantas beams is unknown. Therefore it's not a good nor bad showing by AM.
The grenade launcher showing is a low showing, but at least it caused no damage. The submarine feat contradicts that showing.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
__________________
Thanks for the sig Scot-and for the help with my avatar
When someone annoys you, it takes 42 muscles to frown but only 4 to reach out and bchslap them upside down on their head
__________________
Thanks for the sig Scot-and for the help with my avatar
When someone annoys you, it takes 42 muscles to frown but only 4 to reach out and bchslap them upside down on their head
The beam is thin.
Thor didn't resist any attack that was capable of destroying a city. He was subjected to less than 1 millionth of the energy that destroyed the city.
AM resist over 560,000 tons. Therefore he's more durable than Thor against pressure.
Newton's 3rd law. AM body experienced the same amount of force it exerted. I push your head into a steel door with 5 tons of force. I'm the propulsion and you are AM and the door is the sub.
AM's body resisting .56 tons isn't that impressive.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
Still doesn't negate the fact that AM resisted more than 560,000 tons of force on his body. You can argue fiction inconsistency but you can't argue against that fact. Now go troll somewhere else.
As for the rest of you, you are terrible debaters. You resort to flaming attacks because you are too stupid to attack the actual argument.
That's how I know when I win.
Just like your opinion doesn't negate the fact that Thor withstood the full force of a neutron star, You can argue fiction inconsistency but you can't argue against that fact.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
Not according to the science guy that has been posted numerous times, after all. if your youtuber counts, so does ours. likewise, if our youtuber doesn't count, then neither does yours.
So which is it. do both youtubers count or do neither of them count?
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
KMC Community Forums
Aug 12th, 2021 11:10 PM
