KillerMovies - Movies That Matter!

REGISTER HERE TO JOIN IN! - It's easy and it's free!
Home » Community » General Discussion Forum » Abortion

Do you beleve in abortion?
You do not have permission to vote on this poll.
Yes 249 48.16%
No 221 42.75%
? 47 9.09%
Total: 517 votes 100%
  [Edit Poll (moderators only)]

Abortion
Started by: Julie

Forum Jump:
Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (787): « First ... « 599 600 [601] 602 603 » ... Last »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread
Classic NES
Balloooooooooooooon

Gender: Male
Location: The sewers of the Big City!

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Obviously the foetus.

His point was that potential does not equal goal.


-AC


Doesn't matter if the fetus is human or not by definition, But it can be argued that abortion is morally wrong.


__________________

Old Post Jun 3rd, 2007 11:25 PM
Classic NES is currently offline Click here to Send Classic NES a Private Message Find more posts by Classic NES Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
chillmeistergen
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom

Account Restricted

Definition of democracy: 'The term democracy indicates a form of government where all the state's decisions are exercised directly or indirectly by a majority of its citizenry through a fair elective process. When these factors are met a government can be classified as such. This can apply to a multitude of government systems as these concepts transcend and often occur concomitantly with other types.'
Definition of republic:democracy: a political system in which the supreme power lies in a body of citizens who can elect people to represent them.
Definition of republic: a form of government whose head of state is not a monarch; "the head of state in a republic is usually a president"

Just because the country is not ruled by monarchy, doesn't mean it's not a democracy.


__________________

"All morons hate it when you call them a moron." - Holden Caulfield

Old Post Jun 3rd, 2007 11:25 PM
chillmeistergen is currently offline Click here to Send chillmeistergen a Private Message Find more posts by chillmeistergen Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Grinning Goku
**********.

Gender: Male
Location: J. Edgar Hoover Building

.


__________________


PSN handle: B_B_Kang

Old Post Jun 3rd, 2007 11:27 PM
Grinning Goku is currently offline Click here to Send Grinning Goku a Private Message Find more posts by Grinning Goku Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Ashestoashesjc
Senior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location:

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
Moral are arbitarysince they are not dictated by facts, but perceptions.


But these "Perceptions" make up everything, Religion, decisions, lifestyles. How are they so easily thrown aside to make way for Science?

Old Post Jun 3rd, 2007 11:28 PM
Ashestoashesjc is currently offline Click here to Send Ashestoashesjc a Private Message Find more posts by Ashestoashesjc Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
chillmeistergen
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom

Account Restricted

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
Doesn't matter if the fetus is human or not by definition, But it can be argued that abortion is morally wrong.


By following your set of morals, which you will readily enforce on others.


__________________

"All morons hate it when you call them a moron." - Holden Caulfield

Old Post Jun 3rd, 2007 11:29 PM
chillmeistergen is currently offline Click here to Send chillmeistergen a Private Message Find more posts by chillmeistergen Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Adam_PoE
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Royal Palace

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
Doesn't matter if the fetus is human or not by definition, But it can be argued that abortion is morally wrong.


I propose then, that we grant that the fetus is a person from the moment of conception. How does the argument go from here? Something like this, I take it:

Every person has a right to life, so the fetus has a right to life. No doubt the mother has a right to decide what shall happen in and to her body, everyone would grant that. But surely, a person's right to life is stronger and more stringent than the mother's right to decide what happens in and to her body, and so outweighs it. So the fetus may not be killed, an abortion may not be performed.

It sounds plausible, but now let me ask you to imagine this:

You wake up in the morning and find yourself back-to-back in bed with an unconscious violinist . . . a famous unconscious violinist. He has been found to have a fatal kidney ailment, and the Society of Music Lovers has canvassed all the available medical records and found that you alone have the right blood type to help. Therefore, they have kidnapped you, and last night, the violinist's circulatory system was plugged into yours so that your kidneys can be used to extract poisons from his blood as well as your own.

The director of the hospital now tells you, "Look, we're sorry the Society of Music Lovers did this to you, we would never have permitted it if we had known. But still, they did it, and the violinist now is plugged into you. To unplug you would be to kill him. But never mind, it's only for nine months, by then he will have recovered from his ailment, and can safely be unplugged from you."

Is it morally incumbent on you to accede to this situation? No doubt it would be very nice of you if you did, a great kindness. But do you have to accede to it? What if it were not nine months, but nine years? Or longer still?

What if the director of the hospital says, "Tough luck, I agree, but now you've got to stay in bed with the violinist plugged into you for the rest of your life, because remember this: All persons have a right to life, and violinists are persons. Granted you have a right to decide what happens in and to your body, but a person's right to life outweighs your right to decide what happens in and to your body, so you cannot ever be unplugged from him."

I imagine you would regard this as outrageous, which suggests that something really is wrong with that plausible sounding argument I mentioned a moment ago.


__________________

Old Post Jun 3rd, 2007 11:30 PM
Adam_PoE is currently offline Click here to Send Adam_PoE a Private Message Find more posts by Adam_PoE Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Ashestoashesjc
Senior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location:

quote: (post)
Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Definition of democracy: 'The term democracy indicates a form of government where all the state's decisions are exercised directly or indirectly by a majority of its citizenry through a fair elective process. When these factors are met a government can be classified as such. This can apply to a multitude of government systems as these concepts transcend and often occur concomitantly with other types.'
Definition of republic:democracy: a political system in which the supreme power lies in a body of citizens who can elect people to represent them.
Definition of republic: a form of government whose head of state is not a monarch; "the head of state in a republic is usually a president"

Just because the country is not ruled by monarchy, doesn't mean it's not a democracy.


So are we a republic or a Democracy? I thought America was a democracy! I must've dozed off during a couple of those History lessons.

Old Post Jun 3rd, 2007 11:30 PM
Ashestoashesjc is currently offline Click here to Send Ashestoashesjc a Private Message Find more posts by Ashestoashesjc Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Rogue Jedi
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: On my way to the Cage

Account Restricted

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Obviously the foetus.

His point was that potential does not equal goal.



Where did I say that? I said they're not CURRENTLY a human being, baby, foetus or whatever.

Dude, honestly and no offense is meant, but if you can't keep up do not expect indulgence.

-AC
Just clarifying. So, these cells do not deserve the right to evolve into a human being?


__________________

All the ways you wish you could be, that's me. I look like you wanna look, I **** like you wanna ****, I am smart, capable, and most importantly, I am free in all the ways that you are not.

Old Post Jun 3rd, 2007 11:30 PM
Rogue Jedi is currently offline Click here to Send Rogue Jedi a Private Message Find more posts by Rogue Jedi Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Classic NES
Balloooooooooooooon

Gender: Male
Location: The sewers of the Big City!

quote: (post)
Originally posted by chillmeistergen
By following your set of morals, which you will readily enforce on others.


Unless you live in a cave on some moutain your still following a set a morals that are enforced by the state.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Ashestoashesjc
So are we a republic or a Democracy? I thought America was a democracy! I must've dozed off during a couple of those History lessons.

We live in a Republic. . .


__________________

Last edited by Classic NES on Jun 3rd, 2007 at 11:33 PM

Old Post Jun 3rd, 2007 11:31 PM
Classic NES is currently offline Click here to Send Classic NES a Private Message Find more posts by Classic NES Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Ashestoashesjc
Senior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location:

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
I propose then, that we grant that the fetus is a person from the moment of conception. How does the argument go from here? Something like this, I take it:

Every person has a right to life, so the fetus has a right to life. No doubt the mother has a right to decide what shall happen in and to her body, everyone would grant that. But surely, a person's right to life is stronger and more stringent than the mother's right to decide what happens in and to her body, and so outweighs it. So the fetus may not be killed, an abortion may not be performed.

It sounds plausible, but now let me ask you to imagine this:

You wake up in the morning and find yourself back-to-back in bed with an unconscious violinist . . . a famous unconscious violinist. He has been found to have a fatal kidney ailment, and the Society of Music Lovers has canvassed all the available medical records and found that you alone have the right blood type to help. Therefore, they have kidnapped you, and last night, the violinist's circulatory system was plugged into yours so that your kidneys can be used to extract poisons from his blood as well as your own.

The director of the hospital now tells you, "Look, we're sorry the Society of Music Lovers did this to you, we would never have permitted it if we had known. But still, they did it, and the violinist now is plugged into you. To unplug you would be to kill him. But never mind, it's only for nine months, by then he will have recovered from his ailment, and can safely be unplugged from you."

Is it morally incumbent on you to accede to this situation? No doubt it would be very nice of you if you did, a great kindness. But do you have to accede to it? What if it were not nine months, but nine years? Or longer still?

What if the director of the hospital says, "Tough luck, I agree, but now you've got to stay in bed with the violinist plugged into you for the rest of your life, because remember this: All persons have a right to life, and violinists are persons. Granted you have a right to decide what happens in and to your body, but a person's right to life outweighs your right to decide what happens in and to your body, so you cannot ever be unplugged from him."

I imagine you would regard this as outrageous, which suggests that something really is wrong with that plausible sounding argument I mentioned a moment ago.


Wow that's a good argument -claps- Well done! I'm jealous///

Old Post Jun 3rd, 2007 11:33 PM
Ashestoashesjc is currently offline Click here to Send Ashestoashesjc a Private Message Find more posts by Ashestoashesjc Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
chillmeistergen
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom

Account Restricted

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
Unless you live in a cave on some moutain your still following a set a morals that are enforced by the state.


There's a difference; it has been scientifically proven that a foetus cannot feel, has no sense of pain and is not yet a human being. Therefore not only would it be enforcing set of morals, but a set of morals which have no backing.


__________________

"All morons hate it when you call them a moron." - Holden Caulfield

Old Post Jun 3rd, 2007 11:38 PM
chillmeistergen is currently offline Click here to Send chillmeistergen a Private Message Find more posts by chillmeistergen Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
chillmeistergen
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom

Account Restricted

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
We live in a Republic. . .


Governed by a democracy.


__________________

"All morons hate it when you call them a moron." - Holden Caulfield

Old Post Jun 3rd, 2007 11:41 PM
chillmeistergen is currently offline Click here to Send chillmeistergen a Private Message Find more posts by chillmeistergen Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Classic NES
Balloooooooooooooon

Gender: Male
Location: The sewers of the Big City!

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
I propose then, that we grant that the fetus is a person from the moment of conception. How does the argument go from here? Something like this, I take it:

Every person has a right to life, so the fetus has a right to life. No doubt the mother has a right to decide what shall happen in and to her body, everyone would grant that. But surely, a person's right to life is stronger and more stringent than the mother's right to decide what happens in and to her body, and so outweighs it. So the fetus may not be killed, an abortion may not be performed.


If the State feels it's illegal to pump certain drugs they deem illegal for whatever reasons into my body. Why can't they do the same for a women, honestly abrotions should only be a last resort for proven rape victims. And, by proven, I mean Women who were raped not do to intoxication or folly.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Adam_PoE

It sounds plausible, but now let me ask you to imagine this:

You wake up in the morning and find yourself back-to-back in bed with an unconscious violinist . . . a famous unconscious violinist. He has been found to have a fatal kidney ailment, and the Society of Music Lovers has canvassed all the available medical records and found that you alone have the right blood type to help. Therefore, they have kidnapped you, and last night, the violinist's circulatory system was plugged into yours so that your kidneys can be used to extract poisons from his blood as well as your own.

The director of the hospital now tells you, "Look, we're sorry the Society of Music Lovers did this to you, we would never have permitted it if we had known. But still, they did it, and the violinist now is plugged into you. To unplug you would be to kill him. But never mind, it's only for nine months, by then he will have recovered from his ailment, and can safely be unplugged from you."

Is it morally incumbent on you to accede to this situation? No doubt it would be very nice of you if you did, a great kindness. But do you have to accede to it? What if it were not nine months, but nine years? Or longer still?

What if the director of the hospital says, "Tough luck, I agree, but now you've got to stay in bed with the violinist plugged into you for the rest of your life, because remember this: All persons have a right to life, and violinists are persons. Granted you have a right to decide what happens in and to your body, but a person's right to life outweighs your right to decide what happens in and to your body, so you cannot ever be unplugged from him."

I imagine you would regard this as outrageous, which suggests that something really is wrong with that plausible sounding argument I mentioned a moment ago.


That sounds like a life and death situtation, problem is most abortions are not. Even if I say yes that doesn't make abortion anymore moral since they definetly are not in the same context as this. Anyway, he could have my kidney since humans have two.


__________________

Old Post Jun 3rd, 2007 11:41 PM
Classic NES is currently offline Click here to Send Classic NES a Private Message Find more posts by Classic NES Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Rogue Jedi
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: On my way to the Cage

Account Restricted

quote: (post)
Originally posted by chillmeistergen
There's a difference; it has been scientifically proven that a foetus cannot feel, has no sense of pain and is not yet a human being. Therefore not only would it be enforcing set of morals, but a set of morals which have no backing.
so, it is not aware. it feels no pain. this makes it OK to abort it?


__________________

All the ways you wish you could be, that's me. I look like you wanna look, I **** like you wanna ****, I am smart, capable, and most importantly, I am free in all the ways that you are not.

Old Post Jun 3rd, 2007 11:41 PM
Rogue Jedi is currently offline Click here to Send Rogue Jedi a Private Message Find more posts by Rogue Jedi Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Classic NES
Balloooooooooooooon

Gender: Male
Location: The sewers of the Big City!

quote: (post)
Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Governed by a democracy.


So, the majority can pass bills, last I checked that was the senates job.
quote: (post)
Originally posted by chillmeistergen
There's a difference; it has been scientifically proven that a foetus cannot feel, has no sense of pain and is not yet a human being. Therefore not only would it be enforcing set of morals, but a set of morals which have no backing.


That's nice but science does not dictate morals, and since when did morals need backing to be enforced?


__________________

Old Post Jun 3rd, 2007 11:42 PM
Classic NES is currently offline Click here to Send Classic NES a Private Message Find more posts by Classic NES Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Schecter
Restricted

Gender: Unspecified
Location: **** you

Account Restricted

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
so, it is not aware. it feels no pain. this makes it OK to abort it?


also because it was never previously a sentient human being. oh, did i just kill your trump card? the spike-score comatose patient irrelevancy?


__________________

"Sell crazy someplace else. We're all stocked up here."

Old Post Jun 3rd, 2007 11:44 PM
Schecter is currently offline Click here to Send Schecter a Private Message Find more posts by Schecter Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Classic NES
Balloooooooooooooon

Gender: Male
Location: The sewers of the Big City!

quote: (post)
Originally posted by chillmeistergen
By following your set of morals, which you will readily enforce on others.


So, I'm wrong for doing what's been done since the dawn of human histroy and is also practiced today? So, every country is wrong for enforcing there morals.


__________________

Old Post Jun 3rd, 2007 11:45 PM
Classic NES is currently offline Click here to Send Classic NES a Private Message Find more posts by Classic NES Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Schecter
Restricted

Gender: Unspecified
Location: **** you

Account Restricted

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
So, I'm wrong for doing what's been done since the dawn of human histroy and is also practiced today? So, every country is wrong for enforcing there morals.


that makes no sense. all you people conveniently ignore the fact that their is a majority besides you. throughout history its apparent that when one majority imposes their will and beliefs on the other, its always bad and certainly not an age of moral greatness, you pompous person.


__________________

"Sell crazy someplace else. We're all stocked up here."

Old Post Jun 3rd, 2007 11:48 PM
Schecter is currently offline Click here to Send Schecter a Private Message Find more posts by Schecter Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
debbiejo
Dreamer

Gender: Unspecified
Location:

A late term fetus does feel pain, it's documented.

Old Post Jun 3rd, 2007 11:48 PM
debbiejo is currently offline Find more posts by debbiejo Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
chillmeistergen
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom

Account Restricted

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
So, the majority can pass bills, last I checked that was the senates job.


I don't think you understand:- go back to school.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
That's nice but science does not dictate morals, and since when did morals need backing to be enforced? [/B]


Legally, they always require backing to be enforced. Would you like to live in tyranny, where all laws are decided based on personal beliefs? You're unbelievably cretinous.


__________________

"All morons hate it when you call them a moron." - Holden Caulfield

Old Post Jun 3rd, 2007 11:48 PM
chillmeistergen is currently offline Click here to Send chillmeistergen a Private Message Find more posts by chillmeistergen Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
All times are UTC. The time now is 08:31 PM.
Pages (787): « First ... « 599 600 [601] 602 603 » ... Last »   Last Thread   Next Thread

Home » Community » General Discussion Forum » Abortion

Email this Page
Subscribe to this Thread
   Post New Thread  Post A Reply

Forum Jump:
Search by user:
 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON

Text-only version
 

< - KillerMovies.com - Forum Archive - Forum Rules >


© Copyright 2000-2006, KillerMovies.com. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by: vBulletin, copyright ©2000-2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.