That was clearly hyperbole since Tony explicitly states to be trying to DRAIN Hulk of all his gamma radiation (and hence was succeeding at one point). Plus Hulk was being manipulated (and inhabited) by a supernatural being. That's like chaos king inside Zeus. So it might not be kosher to cleanly give Hulk any feats while he is compromised in such a way.
According to the comic that Hulk was compromised by a supernatural being. That's why Odin was trying to stop Thor. Read the comic.
The draining of Hulk was the attack.
You do not have any strong evidence that it was meant to be literal (and not hyperbole). In fact, There is stronger evidence that supports hyperbole than the other way around.
Hulk was not compromised in that scene, you nut. When Titan took over (compromised), he took complete control of Hulk. Also, Hulk defeated Titan at the end of the fight anyways. Hulk>Titan. Odin was trying to stop Thor because Banner showed Odin what happened. Hulk was innocent but Thor and Ironman was still trying to take him out. Odin didn't try to stop Thor because Titan was taking over, lol.
No it wasn't. The blast was the attack. Ironman was just draining his power at the same time. Draining some doesn't destroy Celestial bodies.
So Flash and Superman chain ft is hyperbole? Gotcha.
Before I rebut this, let me ask a question.
What is your point?
That everything stated in comics is to be taken literally?
That everything in comics is to be taken as hyperbole?
Or there are rules for knowing the difference?
If the latter, then what are your rules for determining which is which?
KMC Community Forums
May 26th, 2023 04:41 PM
oooooooOOOOOH, GREAT Post! 
