KillerMovies - Movies That Matter!

REGISTER HERE TO JOIN IN! - It's easy and it's free!
Home » Movies » Movie Discussion » Movie Versus Forum » Namor (MCU) vs Homelander (The Boys)

Namor (MCU) vs Homelander (The Boys)
Started by: Thinkerer

Forum Jump:
Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (7): « First ... « 5 6 [7] Go to first unread post first unread  Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread
Robtard
Senor Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: Captain's Chair, CA

So it's settled, Namor takes this. Glad we're all in consensus thumb up


__________________


You've Just Been Kirked To The Curb

New Post Jul 23rd, 2024 05:24 PM
Robtard is currently offline Click here to Send Robtard a Private Message Find more posts by Robtard Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
riv6672
Senior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location:

^^^Done.


__________________

New Post Jul 23rd, 2024 05:49 PM
riv6672 is currently offline Click here to Send riv6672 a Private Message Find more posts by riv6672 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
DarkSaint85
Senior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location:

quote: (post)
Originally posted by h1a8
You basically ignored what I said. I just proved that I didn't. Reread the part about the beam slicing through all materials (aluminum and window) at equal speed. An all-aluminum makeup would have resulted in the same duration of time.

Imagine a sweeping laser vaporizing a series of 10 lined-up blocks, 8 made of aluminum and 2 made of acrylic glass. The beam sweeps through the aluminum blocks at the same speed as the acrylic blocks.

Therefore, replacing all the blocks with aluminum blocks means the beam would vaporize all 10 blocks in the same amount of time as the previous mixed set of 10.


But the energy required would not be the same, to laser through 8blocks of aluminium+ 2 blocks of acrylic, Vs 10 blocks of aluminium (your initial assertion).

So your original post about his HV being able to go up to 20,000 degrees C is grossly inflated, as I said.


__________________

New Post Jul 23rd, 2024 06:59 PM
DarkSaint85 is currently offline Click here to Send DarkSaint85 a Private Message Find more posts by DarkSaint85 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
h1a8
Senior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States

Double post


__________________
"Such fragile lifeformses."

-General Zod: Superman II

Last edited by h1a8 on Jul 25th, 2024 at 06:39 PM

New Post Jul 25th, 2024 06:36 PM
h1a8 is currently offline Click here to Send h1a8 a Private Message Find more posts by h1a8 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
h1a8
Senior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States

quote: (post)
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
But the energy required would not be the same, to laser through 8blocks of aluminium+ 2 blocks of acrylic, Vs 10 blocks of aluminium (your initial assertion).

So your original post about his HV being able to go up to 20,000 degrees C is grossly inflated, as I said.



The logic might have been unclear. Let me simplify it further.

Line up five blocks in a row from left to right on a flat surface. Have a laser sweep at a constant speed from left to right, destroying them one at a time over a total of 5 seconds.

What's the rate at which the laser, moving at that speed, CAN destroy blocks lined up in a row? It's 1 block per second, right?

Now, repeat the process but remove the middle block.

What's the rate at which the laser, moving at that speed, CAN destroy the remaining blocks? Is it 0.8 blocks per second or still 1 block per second?

Did removing the middle block change the rate of the CAN ?

If you say yes, then you're either mistaken or not understanding the concept. Removing a block does not change the rate at which the laser CAN destroy blocks.

If this is still unclear, just calculate the destruction of the first block in the first second to achieve the same rate.


__________________
"Such fragile lifeformses."

-General Zod: Superman II

New Post Jul 25th, 2024 06:39 PM
h1a8 is currently offline Click here to Send h1a8 a Private Message Find more posts by h1a8 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
DarkSaint85
Senior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location:

But your entire post on the temperature was predicated on the HV melting X volume of aluminium in Y time.

My point is that the X volume of aluminium is too much. Thus, the temperatures reached is grossly inflated.


__________________

New Post Jul 26th, 2024 09:29 AM
DarkSaint85 is currently offline Click here to Send DarkSaint85 a Private Message Find more posts by DarkSaint85 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Darth Thor
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Asgard

Btw is there any evidence he can change the temperature of his HV? Like lessen the temperature if he wants to hold back? Or increase the temperature if he's going all out?

If not then it's just 500 degrees as stated on the animated show.

New Post Jul 26th, 2024 11:40 AM
Darth Thor is currently offline Click here to Send Darth Thor a Private Message Find more posts by Darth Thor Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
DarkSaint85
Senior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location:

He's used it to heat up bottles of milk before, so I'd assume so.


__________________

New Post Jul 26th, 2024 12:17 PM
DarkSaint85 is currently offline Click here to Send DarkSaint85 a Private Message Find more posts by DarkSaint85 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Darth Thor
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Asgard

quote: (post)
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
He's used it to heat up bottles of milk before, so I'd assume so.



Ah okay.

New Post Jul 27th, 2024 07:51 AM
Darth Thor is currently offline Click here to Send Darth Thor a Private Message Find more posts by Darth Thor Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
HulkIsHulk
Senior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: Only Hulk is Hulk

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Darth Thor
Ah okay.


And not only that. He can slice people apart easily even through helmets and kevlar, but used a weakened blast to slowly kill Stillwell in S1 finale.


__________________

Thanks for the sig Scot-and for the help with my avatar
When someone annoys you, it takes 42 muscles to frown but only 4 to reach out and bchslap them upside down on their head

New Post Jul 28th, 2024 12:56 AM
HulkIsHulk is currently offline Click here to Send HulkIsHulk a Private Message Find more posts by HulkIsHulk Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
h1a8
Senior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States

quote: (post)
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
But your entire post on the temperature was predicated on the HV melting X volume of aluminium in Y time.

My point is that the X volume of aluminium is too much. Thus, the temperatures reached is grossly inflated.


Bad logic (your conclusion does not follow from your premises).

Aluminum is too much as well as the time.
I counted the time where the HV was hitting the window.
I proven that the rate stays the same.

Fill in the window with aluminum and count the time
Or
Keep the window and subtract the extra time to achieve the same result.


__________________
"Such fragile lifeformses."

-General Zod: Superman II

New Post Jul 28th, 2024 05:48 AM
h1a8 is currently offline Click here to Send h1a8 a Private Message Find more posts by h1a8 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
DarkSaint85
Senior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location:

quote: (post)
Originally posted by h1a8
Bad logic (your conclusion does not follow from your premises).

Aluminum is too much as well as the time.
I counted the time where the HV was hitting the window.
I proven that the rate stays the same.

Fill in the window with aluminum and count the time
Or
Keep the window and subtract the extra time to achieve the same result.

But the amount of energy required to melt acrylic is much less than that of aluminium.

So the rate staying the same means nothing. Walk us through your calculations, like you did in the other thread. Start with assumptions etc. This is the only way to help you see your mistake.


__________________

New Post Jul 29th, 2024 11:23 AM
DarkSaint85 is currently offline Click here to Send DarkSaint85 a Private Message Find more posts by DarkSaint85 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
h1a8
Senior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States

quote: (post)
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
But the amount of energy required to melt acrylic is much less than that of aluminium.

So the rate staying the same means nothing. Walk us through your calculations, like you did in the other thread. Start with assumptions etc. This is the only way to help you see your mistake.


Lack of understanding.
The HV was melting the aluminum at a specific rate.
The energy involved is irrelevant.
It's all about the rate.

I never calculated the total energy at all.
Where do you get energy from?


__________________
"Such fragile lifeformses."

-General Zod: Superman II

New Post Jul 29th, 2024 11:38 PM
h1a8 is currently offline Click here to Send h1a8 a Private Message Find more posts by h1a8 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
All times are UTC. The time now is 05:01 AM.
Pages (7): « First ... « 5 6 [7]   Last Thread   Next Thread

Home » Movies » Movie Discussion » Movie Versus Forum » Namor (MCU) vs Homelander (The Boys)

Email this Page
Subscribe to this Thread
   Post New Thread  Post A Reply

Forum Jump:
Search by user:
 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON

Text-only version
 

< - KillerMovies.com - Forum Archive - Forum Rules >


© Copyright 2000-2006, KillerMovies.com. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by: vBulletin, copyright ©2000-2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.