Darth Bane vs. TPM Maul
Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.
The Ellimist
1. Force
2. Sabers
3. All-out
Trocity
Probably goes down like Bane vs Kas'im; Maul gains the upperhand through superior blade work, gets over confident, Bane hits him with tent dropping TK and kills him.
JKBart
Whoever wins, wins by some pathetic accident
UCanShootMyNova
Maul falls off a cliff and impales himself and Bane collapses a temple on himself.
JKBart
Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
Maul falls off a cliff and impales himself and Bane collapses a temple on himself.
I wouldn't rule out such a scenario with a proper writer
SeriousLogic
Filoni's email anyone?
JKBart
Originally posted by SeriousLogic
Filoni's email anyone?
Only if you're going to ask him to do this scenario

SeriousLogic
No. I'm going to threaten to kill his family if Maul doesn't start to kick ass again.
cs_zoltan
Originally posted by SeriousLogic
No. I'm going to threaten to kill his family if Maul doesn't start to kick ass again.
http://hulkster.pp.fi/Gifs/Cry/Cartman-violin.gif
Dry the tears.
The Ellimist
Originally posted by carthage
Not sure
Lmfao
Jmanghan
Originally posted by Trocity
Probably goes down like Bane vs Kas'im; Maul gains the upperhand through superior blade work, gets over confident, Bane hits him with tent dropping TK and kills him. Maul has superior force feats too, tbh.
Bane isn't beating guys like Kenobi, Dooku, or Maul.
Ascendancy
Originally posted by Jmanghan
Maul has superior force feats too, tbh.
Such as? The padawan who went all oneness with the Force and put Maul on his hind quarters sure isn't pulling that against Bane. Definitely feats of failure in the Force compared to Bane. I also don't recall descriptions of Maul's blade work that show he quite peaks in speed where Bane does.
But if you are serious I would like to know what showings in the Force indicate Maul as being superior to Bane. Bane's ashing people with lighting and learning to harness and master it on his own vs Maul's inability to manifest it at all isn't one, so that's out as well. Anyway, do list what you're referring to.
Jmanghan
Originally posted by Ascendancy
Such as? The padawan who went all oneness with the Force and put Maul on his hind quarters sure isn't pulling that against Bane. Definitely feats of failure in the Force compared to Bane. I also don't recall descriptions of Maul's blade work that show he quite peaks in speed where Bane does.
But if you are serious I would like to know what showings in the Force indicate Maul as being superior to Bane. Bane's ashing people with lighting and learning to harness and master it on his own vs Maul's inability to manifest it at all isn't one, so that's out as well. Anyway, do list what you're referring to. Any Padawan that goes Oneness beats Bane by default.
Doesn't even have to be an impressive Padawan.
I'll respond later on.
MercyZiegler
Bane trounces this fool
Fated Xtasy
Originally posted by MercyZiegler
Bane trounces this fool
Reasons? Newbie?
MercyZiegler
Originally posted by Fated Xtasy
Reasons? Newbie?
I wasn't aware one of the most powerful sith lords in the history of Banite Sith needed a reason to crush Maul at this stage?
But if you need one then then I'll humour you.
Kasim>Qui Gon
Raskta>Obi Wan and Komari Vosa
Zannah>All of them.
The Ellimist
Originally posted by MercyZiegler
I wasn't aware one of the most powerful sith lords in the history of Banite Sith
He's actually the weakest by design. Every Banite sith was more powerful than the previous.
MercyZiegler
Feats and accolades say otherwise.
If this logic is applied then the very first Sith -Xoxann and Murr- get shat on by Kun. So that train of thought is inherently flawed.
The Ellimist
Originally posted by MercyZiegler
Feats and accolades say otherwise.
If this logic is applied then the very first Sith -Xoxann and Murr- get shat on by Kun. So that train of thought is inherently flawed.
The rule of two is special, but thanks for bringing up accolades:
For a millennium, the Sith maintained the order in secrecy, passing down their evil heritage. As they gained knowledge of the dark side of the Force, their powers increased with each generation.
Source: Epsidode 1: The Phantom Menace Scrapbook
MercyZiegler
Originally posted by The Ellimist
The rule of two is special, but thanks for bringing up accolades:
For a millennium, the Sith maintained the order in secrecy, passing down their evil heritage. As they gained knowledge of the dark side of the Force, their powers increased with each generation.
Source: Epsidode 1: The Phantom Menace Scrapbook
That's nice?
That only applies to Sith that have surpassed their masters. Clearly Maul didn't. Cause ya kno, he lost his dick to a Padawan Kenobi.
But that's fine go ahead and ignore the setback the Sith suffered when Gravid went rogue. Denial is always expected amidst defeat
SunRazer
Accolades make each Banite Sith more powerful than the last, lol. Bane's the weakest of the Banite Sith.
And no, you can't apply that to other Sith Orders. It's only ever mentioned for Bane's Order of the Sith Lords.
Maul, Tyranus and Vader don't get scaling, though.
Emperordmb
Originally posted by SunRazer
Accolades make each Banite Sith more powerful than the last, lol. Bane's the weakest of the Banite Sith Masters
FTFY
Edit: Damn ****ing Nova you ninja ****
SunRazer
Originally posted by MercyZiegler
But that's fine go ahead and ignore the setback the Sith suffered when Gravid went rogue. Denial is always expected amidst defeat
The setback was in knowledge, not raw power. Gean still succeeded in killing Gravid, so she still grew more powerful. The cycle still continued. And the newest sourcebooks, published well after Darth Plagueis only reiterate the fact that each generation of Banite Sith was more powerful than the last.
The Ellimist
Originally posted by SunRazer
Accolades make each Banite Sith more powerful than the last, lol. Bane's the weakest of the Banite Sith.
And no, you can't apply that to other Sith Orders. It's only ever mentioned for Bane's Order of the Sith Lords.
Maul, Tyranus and Vader don't get scaling, though.
I'm not sure if it's a troll account or not.
SunRazer
Originally posted by The Ellimist
I'm not sure if it's a troll account or not.
I don't call troll on everyone who denies it, but yeah, the facts are arrayed in our favor.
Originally posted by Emperordmb
FTFY
Edit: Damn ****ing Nova you ninja ****

Jmanghan
Originally posted by MercyZiegler
Feats and accolades say otherwise.
If this logic is applied then the very first Sith -Xoxann and Murr- get shat on by Kun. So that train of thought is inherently flawed. Kun isn't shitting on Muur.
SunRazer
That was his point, lol.
The Ellimist
Tbf, the Banite progression doesn't prove that Bane < Maul any more than it proves that Sidious < Maul, but it does make it pretty plausible.
MercyZiegler
Originally posted by SunRazer
Accolades make each Banite Sith more powerful than the last, lol. Bane's the weakest of the Banite Sith.
And no, you can't apply that to other Sith Orders. It's only ever mentioned for Bane's Order of the Sith Lords.
Maul, Tyranus and Vader don't get scaling, though.
So the quote is irrelevant and Bane still stomps Maul?
Make sense. Can I please get my guys and my bitches and some weed now?
Originally posted by Emperordmb
FTFY
Edit: Damn ****ing Nova you ninja ****

UCanShootMyNova
Bane stomps.
SunRazer
Originally posted by The Ellimist
Tbf, the Banite progression doesn't prove that Bane < Maul any more than it proves that Sidious < Maul, but it does make it pretty plausible.
Sounds like a Jack alt again, actually. lol
Originally posted by MercyZiegler
So the quote is irrelevant and Bane still stomps Maul?
Carthage, we need you.
Wait, he shits on Maul even harder than Bane now. Hmmm....
carthage
It becomes something of what you consider more impressive. Obviously, Maul can be called into question for failing against Padawans multiple times, his mediocre force feats, and his inconsistent showings. But Bane's feats are hardly better, lol
MercyZiegler
Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
Bane stomps.
Good man.
Originally posted by The Ellimist
I'm not sure if it's a troll account or not.
Sock? Troll? Dafuq?
The Ellimist
Originally posted by carthage
It becomes something of what you consider more impressive. Obviously, Maul can be called into question for failing against Padawans multiple times, his mediocre force feats, and his inconsistent showings. But Bane's feats are hardly better, lol
Honestly, TPM Obi Wan and Erza are more impressive than mercenaries and Farfalla.
McP
Originally posted by MercyZiegler
I wasn't aware one of the most powerful sith lords in the history of Banite Sith needed a reason to crush Maul at this stage?
But if you need one then then I'll humour you.
Kasim>Qui Gon
Raskta>Obi Wan and Komari Vosa
Zannah>All of them.
Lol, Qui-Gon > Kas'im
Obi-Wan as of ROTS > Raskta
Tholme/Smoke > Zannah
cs_zoltan
Originally posted by McP
Lol, Qui-Gon > Kas'im
Obi-Wan as of TPM > Raskta
Tholme/Smoke > Zannah
Fixed.
chingchangwalla
Lovin the Tholme/Smoke
Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.
Copyright 1999-2025 KillerMovies.