Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Obviously this is a very big topic and with the recent presidential race this fact became even more apparent.

Some insights on the issue, enjoy:

YjFmOKqyWpE

Enjoyed the video, and also didn't notice your thread until now. Hmm, something shockingly familiar about the title of your topic. Surely you posted this after Putrumpin and..*looks at times both topics were psoted* oh. So indeed, this topic butthurt someone so much they created a topic to mock it.

Hilarious, you know you got under that persons skin. I doubt they even watched the video, just seeing that it dissed CNN probably was enough to trigger them.

Truth is the thing with Trump and CNN was vastly overblown, with some acting like it was the end of journalism as we know it. I would have felt perhaps more sympathy for CNN if I hadn't seen their bullshit in the past with my own eyes. Anyone disturbed by the event..fret not:

Mainstream Media Meltdown: 'Journalists' Seek 'Safe Space' To Discuss "How To Cover Trump"

Thankfully the Obama administration treated everyone, especially FOX, quite well at various things like press conferences, so there was never a need for this type of landmark meeting before.

Yeah, I think CNN is getting way more flak in this case than they deserve. CNN has definitely done some shady and stupid things in the past, and have earned plenty of criticism over the last few years. I don't know what it is about CNN, maybe the new ownership, but there's been a very clear shift in the quality of their reporting over the last few years.

But anyways, in this case I don't think CNN really did anything wrong - they essentially reported that intelligence agencies told Trump and Obama that Russia has potentially damaging information on Trump, which was true, and the only reason they reported that much is because McCain met with Comey and gave him the dossier with the supposed information in it, and CNN didn't really report the details that were in the dossier; they didn't report the salacious stuff, that was all buzzfeed's doing. And even after buzzfeed reported it CNN was very hesitant to get into that stuff and avoided details entirely. But it seems like Trump and some others are lumping CNN and Buzzfeed together here, which is incorrect and not very fair.

Originally posted by Surtur
Enjoyed the video, and also didn't notice your thread until now. Hmm, something shockingly familiar about the title of your topic. Surely you posted this after Putrumpin and..*looks at times both topics were psoted* oh. So indeed, this topic butthurt someone so much they created a topic to mock it.


Hilarious, you know you got under that persons skin. I doubt they even watched the video, just seeing that it dissed CNN probably was enough to trigger them.
You may be onto something

Originally posted by Surtur
Truth is the thing with Trump and CNN was vastly overblown, with some acting like it was the end of journalism as we know it. I would have felt perhaps more sympathy for CNN if I hadn't seen their bullshit in the past with my own eyes. Anyone disturbed by the event..fret not:
Agreed.

Originally posted by Surtur
Mainstream Media Meltdown: 'Journalists' Seek 'Safe Space' To Discuss "How To Cover Trump"
Nice.

Also, the way he says "so-called journalists from the Huffington Post, Slate, CNN, and Univision" is priceless.

Originally posted by Surtur
Thankfully the Obama administration treated everyone, especially FOX, quite well at various things like press conferences, so there was never a need for this type of landmark meeting before.
LOL you went there. But yeah, you hit the nail on the head. This is just a blatant hypocrisy on the Left and Liberals's side. Comments from that clip also point that out:



or my favorite:

Originally posted by BackFire
Yeah, I think CNN is getting way more flak in this case than they deserve. CNN has definitely done some shady and stupid things in the past, and have earned plenty of criticism over the last few years. I don't know what it is about CNN, maybe the new ownership, but there's been a very clear shift in the quality of their reporting over the last few years.

But anyways, in this case I don't think CNN really did anything wrong - they essentially reported that intelligence agencies told Trump and Obama that Russia has potentially damaging information on Trump, which was true, and the only reason they reported that much is because McCain met with Comey and gave him the dossier with the supposed information in it, and CNN didn't really report the details that were in the dossier; they didn't report the salacious stuff, that was all buzzfeed's doing. And even after buzzfeed reported it CNN was very hesitant to get into that stuff and avoided details entirely. But it seems like Trump and some others are lumping CNN and Buzzfeed together here, which is incorrect and not very fair.

They didn't report the salacious stuff, just of course told you where to find it all. After CNN was the one who initially broke the story in the first place before Buzzfeed, with a story that boiled down to "Obama and Trump were given some unverified reports".

Buzzfeed saw this, posted the reports. Then CNN and others seized on it, being very careful not to call it true or divulge too much information, while of course telling you where to find it and spreading the story further.

The part of the story that CNN broke is obviously news worthy - That Russia potentially has tapes that could compromise the incoming president. From CNN's perspective, the fact that the intelligence community thought it was worthy of telling Obama and Trump, and the fact that John McCain thought it was worth passing along to the head of the FBI, made it news worthy. If they wanted to report it frivolously they had plenty of opportunities since these dossiers and memos had been circulating for months before CNN reported on them.

I like how when the Left do "How to Spot Fake News" bits they never seem to give EXAMPLES of organizations giving fake news.

Originally posted by BackFire
The part of the story that CNN broke is obviously news worthy - That Russia potentially has tapes that could compromise the incoming president. From CNN's perspective, the fact that the intelligence community thought it was worthy of telling Obama and Trump, and the fact that John McCain thought it was worth passing along to the head of the FBI, made it news worthy. If they wanted to report it frivolously they had plenty of opportunities since these dossiers and memos had been circulating for months before CNN reported on them.

Lol but it didn't even go through proper channels though, you realize that, correct? The report, I mean? With the way it made it's way to Trump and Obama?

Also what you just said didn't change the fact that they set the stage and then immediately pounced once Buzzfeed printed it, gleefully telling readers where it could be found. They might as well have just linked directly to buzzfeed. Can you not see how, even a tiny bit, shit like that just reinforces the story?

Then they are utterly aghast at being called out, as if they have never pulled bullshit before. But of course they have.

I love seeing them get manipulated though, since they more or less bashed Buzzfeed more than they bashed Trump, even after the press conference lol.

To be fair CNN is less likely to full fabricate a story, they are more sly, just editing out key details in order to mislead an audience they obviously feel is dumb as f*ck.

What do you mean proper channels? I was under the impression that the intelligence community simply told Trump and Obama that there are reports that Russia may have bad info on Trump. And that's all CNN initially reported.

I understand what you're saying with how they "gleefully" reported buzzfeed's dump, but all news networks, save Fox News, were reporting on that in very awkward ways. It was amusing to watch them dance around the bush and hint at "personal information" but not really saying what it was. And I have trouble blaming CNN here for something Buzzfeed did. It's not as if when CNN reported on the fact that Obama and Trump were told that Russia may have bad info on Trump that they knew Buzzfeed would release an unverified dossier that says Trump likes getting pissed on.

I'm not saying there's no fair criticism of CNN here, perhaps they rushed the story, perhaps they didn't think through the potential outcome of publishing said story without fully vetting it. But those aren't the same as "fake news". This was real news perhaps published incorrectly.

Originally posted by BackFire

I'm not saying there's no fair criticism of CNN here, perhaps they rushed the story, perhaps they didn't think through the potential outcome of publishing said story without fully vetting it. But those aren't the same as "fake news". This was real news perhaps published incorrectly.

This is what hayseeds like Surtur and Polanski are unable to understand. Fake news would be Breitbart outright fabricating a story for no other reason than to spread fear and hate. Or World Weekly News' stories on Batboy.

They don't understand they are the ones being duped and a west like Putin's Russia would be far worse by factors than Bush's or Obama's USA.

Originally posted by Stop the hate
They don't understand they are the ones being duped and a west like Putin's Russia would be far worse by factors than Bush's or Obama's USA.


10 to 1, you watch parody Trump porn.

Originally posted by Silent Master
10 to 1, you watch parody Trump porn.

You mean SNL?

On topic:

-0_zOgLlWHM

My favorite part is when a news anchor openly states that CNN is biased and helps Hillary:

At 1:30 mark:



Also, the clip shows many examples of CNN "losing satelite connection" or "cutting sound" whenever an argument that does not fit their narrative was being presented. Oops.

You'd need to be pretty naive to think that media outlets especially in the US have any onus upon them to be impartial. It's quite telling also that many outlets supported Clinton given they're run by billionaires with right wing agendas of suppressing wages and employee rights. It kind of puts paid to the notion that the Democrats are in any way left wing or liberal beyond token gestures.

Speaking of the lying media:

ZQei9cy8RF8

CNN's own definitions for fake news seem to include one where a story is a mixture of fact and fiction. Which is of course exactly what they did with the Milwaukee riots story.

Oh look, another thoughtful thread made by Stigma. Thank you sir for bringing so much intelligent, high quality content to this dead forum

Originally posted by BackFire
What do you mean proper channels? I was under the impression that the intelligence community simply told Trump and Obama that there are reports that Russia may have bad info on Trump. And that's all CNN initially reported.

I'm hearing shit about John McCain handing documents off to people and shit. Do you not find it odd a completely utterly unverified report made its way into the hands of Obama and Trump?



They didn't know that Buzzfeed would post it true, but they sure as hell pounced after they did post it.



Perhaps the term should be replaced with "shady news" since it describes CNN perfectly. All fake news would be shady, but not all shady news would be fake.

I don't really find that odd, no. I imagine the president gets many unverified reports from various people, about rumors that are out there and what not, they just usually don't get leaked and we just usually don't hear about them.

I don't mind news agencies having a political tilt one way or the other in their commentary shows/columns. It's when they blatantly cover up for one side and not another, demonize one side much more than the other, openly back one side, etc. in their hard news. The public deserves pure, unfiltered news.

Originally posted by BackFire
I don't really find that odd, no. I imagine the president gets many unverified reports from various people, about rumors that are out there and what not, they just usually don't get leaked and we just usually don't hear about them.

So why was John McCain even involved? Like, at all?

Pure, unfiltered news can only be found in "shock sites".

That's what they want you to believe, to make profit!!

Originally posted by Surtur
So why was John McCain even involved? Like, at all?

Perhaps he thought there was some credence to something in the 30+ page document that he thought intelligence officials should know about.

This thread should be titled "Useful Idiots: How the Gullible Believe Fringe Media Over Actual News."

The lying is bad, but CNN did a literal expose on who you would need to kill in order for the President to be a Democrat. That is irresponsible to the Nth degree.

Originally posted by BackFire
Perhaps he thought there was some credence to something in the 30+ page document that he thought intelligence officials should know about.

So again, you feel that him being involved equates to going through the proper channels?

Originally posted by Henry_Pym
The lying is bad, but CNN did a literal expose on who you would need to kill in order for the President to be a Democrat. That is irresponsible to the Nth degree.

More fake news:

CNN Caught Lying Twice In One Day! Nancy Sinatra and Reddit Put The Brakes On #FakeNews

R/The Donald is the best thing on the internet

Originally posted by Surtur
More fake news:

CNN Caught Lying Twice In One Day! Nancy Sinatra and Reddit Put The Brakes On #FakeNews

Lets see, Surtur.


1) The Sinatra comment was based on a comment Nancy said about "the end is near" in regards to her father's song and Trump, CNN went with that. Nancy later said she was just making a joke and CNN shouldn't have read more into it.

2) An aerial view is superior to a ground level view in telling how big a crowd is.

So it seem you went on to prove Adam's comment correct:

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
This thread should be titled "Useful Idiots: How the Gullible Believe Fringe Media Over Actual News."

So CNN didn't investigate and thus lied?

The second point you made is so dumb it isn't worth arguing.

They took Sinatra's comment at face value and it failed on them. That's not the same as lying.

Being dismissive when you can't properly retort. How do you think that's working out for you? But no surprise you'd be the type to believe the "the biggest crowd ever" lie.

Isn't it rather lazy reporting to just assume you know what someone meant?

It's so good that we have "alternative facts" now. I hated those dull, musty regular old facts. They were stupid things.

Originally posted by Scribble
It's so good that we have "alternative facts" now. I hated those dull, musty regular old facts. They were stupid things.

Alt-Facts for the Alt-Right, rather fitting.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Isn't it rather lazy reporting to just assume you know what someone meant?

Lol, do you see how they try to spin it when it's CNN or something? They bring out every excuse in the book lol. I love how they all suddenly become so understanding. It's like watching someone shapeshift from one form into another.

Originally posted by Surtur
So again, you feel that him being involved equates to going through the proper channels?

Didn't say that. Was answering your previous question. I don't know what the "proper channels" are. And it doesn't really matter. The press can report on things even if they don't go through proper channels.

LOL I like the new thread title.

Still, I think mine was much more on cue.

Originally posted by Stigma
LOL I like the new thread title.

Still, I think mine was much more on cue.

Don't worry, it just shows some epic butthurt lol. So all in all..hilarious.

I hope whoever did it has some cream, because that much hurt requires medical aid.

Originally posted by Robtard
This is what hayseeds like Surtur and Polanski are unable to understand. Fake news would be Breitbart outright fabricating a story for no other reason than to spread fear and hate. Or World Weekly News' stories on Batboy.

Or was it fabricated?

Looking at this:

https://www.thelocal.de/20170105/german-media-blasts-misleading-breitbart-reports-of-violence-on-new-years

And then this:

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/01/08/fake-news-fake-news-media-sow-division-with-dishonest-attack-on-breitbarts-allahu-akbar-church-fire-story/

So there was 1,000 people there, the chants happened, and the fire happened. You could still charge them with a lot over this, but not fabricating a story based on nothing from the ground up (Like claiming you're under attack at ground zero, while you're sipping coffee and eating donuts, or writing a story about a person who doesn't even exist, that kind of thing.)

I don't know, if rushing out what seems to be a sensationalistic story based on the facts at the time is fake news then everybody does fake news, because this kind of half baked shoddy reporting happens everywhere, even at CNN.

Originally posted by cdtm
I don't know, if rushing out what seems to be a sensationalistic story based on the facts at the time is fake news then everybody does fake news, because this kind of half baked shoddy reporting happens everywhere, even at CNN.

This is something people are ignoring as well, and it's potentially a far more damaging aspect of this. The sites that truly are all about fake news eventually do get called out, and they tell blatant crazy falsehoods at times.

The "actual" news networks are more subtle with their shadiness. They won't usually just outright make some shit up. Though they will do things like willfully omitting important facts about a story, and just all around manipulating a story in an incredibly dishonest way. It will be rare to find an article on CNN that is 100% fake news, and therein lies the problem, they'll get away with it more and continue to be able to pull the wool over the eyes of their audience.

Originally posted by Stigma
LOL I like the new thread title.

Still, I think mine was much more on cue.

http://68.media.tumblr.com/495dfac744cd91f9c0fc8136fa59fe31/tumblr_og6u6haGES1ry7pevo2_400.gif

Originally posted by Stigma
LOL I like the new thread title.

Still, I think mine was much more on cue.

Originally posted by Surtur
Don't worry, it just shows some epic butthurt lol. So all in all..hilarious.

I hope whoever did it has some cream, because that much hurt requires medical aid.

#combotrigger

Originally posted by Robtard
#combotrigger

Right right, someone says someone is butthurt, you say they are triggered, right right.

Surtur has his issues, many, many issues, but I don't think he's a D. Masters' acolyte.

What are you guys talking about? The thread title is the same as it's always been.

Wouldn't be the first time they've invented things to whine and get indignant about. "We're being attacked, nothing harder than being a White heterosexual male in America!"

Originally posted by BackFire
What are you guys talking about? The thread title is the same as it's always been.
That's funny because Badabing told me you edited it yesterday.

But I can tell you are joking.

You clever demon.

Originally posted by Stigma
That's funny because Badabing told me you edited it yesterday.

But I can tell you are joking.

Look, this has always been the name of the thread. Period.

Originally posted by Robtard
Wouldn't be the first time they've invented things to whine and get indignant about. "We're being attacked, nothing harder than being a White heterosexual male in America!"

Not just America, other majority-white Western countries too!

Originally posted by Robtard
Wouldn't be the first time they've invented things to whine and get indignant about. "We're being attacked, nothing harder than being a White heterosexual male in America!"

But all you seem to do is whine about others here who you feel whine. It's kind of a weird cycle, isn't it?

But nobody invented anything, I guess we were all just wrong. Nobody would be pathetic enough to actually do what we thought.

You and your longwinded "no you!" retorts Surtur. Get a new angle; that one's boring and makes you look both immature and unimaginative.

Originally posted by Surtur
But all you seem to do is whine about others here who you feel whine. It's kind of a weird cycle, isn't it?

But nobody invented anything, I guess we were all just wrong. Nobody would be pathetic enough to actually do what we thought. TIL making fun of whiners is whining.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
TIL making fun of whiners is whining.

You Leftists SJW PC Nazis passed that point a long LOOOONNGGG time ago Grimey.

Ah yes, fake news from ABC:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jan/25/abc-issues-apology-for-misleading-quote-about-sean/

More of that "actual news", right guys?

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
TIL making fun of whiners is whining.

I've been called a whiner for making fun of whiny SJW's lol.

Can you guys even keep track of your different standards anymore? Or does it even matter anymore, since you can just shout "triggered" anytime it is pointed out?

Originally posted by Surtur
I've been called a whiner for making fun of whiny SJW's lol.

Can you guys even keep track of your different standards anymore? Or does it even matter anymore, since you can just shout "triggered" anytime it is pointed out? If you only stumbled upon sjw and made fun of them, like I do with you it would be one thing. You obsessively look up shit to 'make fun of' while managing to sound pretty upset (lol) all day long.

I hope you can keep track this time.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
If you only stumbled upon sjw and made fun of them, like I do with you it would be one thing. You obsessively look up and post shit to 'make fun of' while managing to sound pretty upset (lol) all day long.

Lol nope, another bullshit excuse. I've had it said even at times I was just making fun of them. Or people just take any response with more than a few sentences as meaning someone is in some huge rage. Which is stupid, but meh.

Also, nobody obsessively looks shit up. I click the stuff that comes up on youtube, it shows videos it thinks you will like based on shit you have watched.

If you think a person would have to obsessively look this shit up to find it..you don't know how widespread it actually is. I can't even remember the last time I had to seek this stuff out lol. SJW's provide more than enough material.

That's the problem with obsessions.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
That's the problem with obsessions.

Whatever you need to tell yourself is fine with me.

Comebacks from Surtur are just getting better by the minute.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Comebacks from Surtur are just getting better by the minute.

Lol, most of your comebacks consist of going "triggered" or some variation of that. Are you just not self aware, even a tiny bit?

Surtur pretending that he doesn't follow Lena Dunham on twitter just to whine about whatever new nonsense she's said/done. Priceless.

Speaking of, it's been a whole week since you've not cried about Dunham saying whatever #triggered you, have to ask, has she been quiet or were you shamed into not crying about her anymore?

Originally posted by Robtard
Surtur pretending that he doesn't follow Lena Dunham on twitter just to whine about whatever new nonsense she's said/done. Priceless.

Speaking of, it's been a whole week since you've not cried about Dunham saying whatever #triggered you, have to ask, has she been quiet or were you shamed into not crying about her anymore?

Lol dude, I want you to step away from yourself for a second. Astral project yourself out of your body. Cuz I know if I had replied in the way you just replied? You'd whine and say I'm triggered.

I'll take that as the later being the answer then, "shamed into not crying about her anymore", as I doubt Dunham has shut up.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol, most of your comebacks consist of going "triggered" or some variation of that. Are you just not self aware, even a tiny bit? Why should I try? All you reply is: 'hypocrisy!' 'No, you!' 'Deflection' 'these tears are from laughter!'

Why was the thread title changed. This is a stab at the op

Originally posted by Robtard
I'll take that as the later being the answer then, "shamed into not crying about her anymore", as I doubt Dunham has shut up.

Shamed by who? You? Lol. As for Dunham, the last I heard was the rebel media thing I posted where she's doing a photo shoot with her legs spread and shit. It's the same video that also showed the nasty older pic of her eating that cake.

Originally posted by Raisen
Why was the thread title changed. This is a stab at the op

People got butthurt for others daring to point out the shadiness of places like CNN. One mod lied despite another mod confirming yep that mod edited it lol. Now remember, the logic around here is this act in itself is not an example of butthurt, but pointing it out..will be said to be butthurt.

Or they'll scream "alternate facts" because they feel it's clever.

Originally posted by Surtur
People got butthurt for others daring to point out the shadiness of places like CNN. One mod lied despite another mod confirming yep that mod edited it lol. Now remember, the logic around here is this act in itself is not an example of butthurt, but pointing it out..will be said to be butthurt.

Or they'll scream "alternate facts" because they feel it's clever.


Wow. That's messed up. How can these people honestly respect themselves as adults

Originally posted by Raisen
Wow. That's messed up. How can these people honestly respect themselves as adults

The same old game: when we do it, it is okay. When someone else does? It is different.

Do as I say, not as I do. The liberal motto.

Originally posted by Surtur
Or they'll scream "alternate facts" because they feel it's clever.

IOW: Only Trumpistas can use the "alternative facts" card. Some would call that setting a double-standard

Originally posted by Robtard
IOW: Only Trumpistas can use the "alternative facts" card. Some would call that setting a double-standard

Nope, just predicting your behavior.

we cannot talk about anything factual that makes trump look bad, for the sake of surtur's delicate constitution.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
we cannot talk about anything factual that makes trump look bad, for the sake of surtur's delicate constitution.

Oh no, you sure can talk about whatever. Just practice consistency.

You consistently lose your shit whenever a fact about Trump is brought up that shows him in an unfavorable light. Surtur. This is a factual fact, for those of us who still remember.

Originally posted by Robtard
You consistently lose your shit whenever a fact about Trump is brought up that shows him in an unfavorable light. Surtur. This is a factual fact, for those of us who still remember.

No I don't. I just have a habit of pointing out the hypocrisy of people when they whine about something Trump did, but didn't whine when someone else did it. Then they use the "he's in power now" excuse, which is my favorite, since even before he was in power they played that hypocrisy game.

see? you can't even indirectly reference without making surtur cry.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
see? you can't even indirectly reference without making surtur cry.

Whenever the bullshit is pointed out this is the response. I like it.

Surtur, I made no direct accusation about Trump and you flipped out anyways and tried to move the topic to someone else. I'm not even sure you're aware you're doing it anymore at this point; it's become instinct for you.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
see? you can't even indirectly reference without making surtur cry.

Exactly

i blame parental over-coddling

The autism is too damn high in here...

You said Trump in the post you said you didn't name Trump... Were your parents twins or something?

is english your second language?

Are your parents twins?

he said he didn't accuse trump of anything in his post. maybe take a deep breath, put the cranky manbaby routine on pause, and read it again? lol of course not. keep winning, champ!

It's hilarious that you cuckolds view winning as an insult.

I'd point out the constant attacks on Trump you guys make, but I'm sure context to words are meaningless to you.

Altrightboy_Pym once again inventing scenarios and flipping out over those, he's special.

Yes I guess to the autistic, the normal is special

You know, an adult would say "alright, I misread what you said and knee-jerked." and that would be that, my son.

Originally posted by Henry_Pym
Yes I guess to the autistic, the normal is special

for someone who mocks autistic people in every post, you sure are coming off as an untreated aspie. i'll go back to ignoring you now, before you start self-harming.

Originally posted by Robtard
You know, an adult would say "alright, I misread what you said and knee-jerked." and that would be that, my son. and an autistic person would think they're related to strangers and repeat phrases over and over. Originally posted by Bashar Teg
for someone who mocks autistic people in every post, you sure are coming off as an untreated aspie. i'll go back to ignoring you now, before you start self-harming. so you admit you're autistic? And so is Rob....

Forgive Rob and Bash, they became BFF's via both of them bonding over being learning disabled.

Originally posted by Henry_Pym
and an autistic person would think they're related to strangers and repeat phrases over and over. so you admit you're autistic? And so is Rob.... So you're an autistic expert? Makes sense.

Alright what the phuck is going on here now

HarryPym apparently is an expert in autism. I'm not gonna argue with that.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
HarryPym apparently is an expert in autism. I'm not gonna argue with that.

For realz? I need him to consult with my gf

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
So you're an autistic expert? Makes sense. Originally posted by Henry_Pym
Yes I guess to the autistic, the normal is special

It's almost like Adam is..triggered.

Also even funnier if he feels you'd need an expert to spot his problems. No more than I need an expert on water to tell me it's wet.

An interesting article. You know things are getting bad when the NYT calls you out.

How to Save CNN From Itself

Problem is..it's the NYT. Might as well have had the Washington Post have a similar article. Still, it is nice to see more people are waking up to CNN's bullshit.

Originally posted by Henry_Pym
Incoherent response? lol
Originally posted by Surtur
It's almost like Adam is..triggered.

Also even funnier if he feels you'd need an expert to spot his problems. No more than I need an expert on water to tell me it's wet. Ok ok, I know I should've thrown a 'lol' in there. I forget you struggle to keep up, my bad.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Incoherent response? lol
Ok ok, I know I should've thrown a 'lol' in there. I forget you struggle to keep up, my bad.

An "lol" isn't evidence of not being triggered so it's irrelevant that you failed to do so.

Riiight over your head m8.

Or was it?

I like how half the arguments on the forum now are about whether someone is or isn't triggered.

Originally posted by BackFire
I like how half the arguments on the forum now are about whether someone is or isn't triggered.

I like it too. Funny how people only noticed it now.

The world against Surtur.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
The world against Surtur.

List of things that trigger Adam so far:

Surtur
The Truth

So you do believe the world is against you? Lol

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
So you do believe the world is against you? Lol

Nah, just laugh at the hypocrisy of people who can't stand the same shit being done.

#Triggered.

Two words misused in the same post?

#combotrigger

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Two words misused in the same post?

#combotrigger

Damn, a "no you". Classic triggered Adam.

Some more actual news for you guys:

Press Pretends to Fact-Check Trump, But Only Misleads Readers

Originally posted by Surtur
Damn, a "no you". Classic triggered Adam. Only it wasn't, step up your game m8.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Only it wasn't, step up your game m8.

Right right, I didn't say you were triggered and you didn't respond that I was triggered in return.

It's not the first time you struggle with a concept/word tbh, it's okay m8

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
It's not the first time you struggle with a concept/word tbh, it's okay m8

List of things that trigger Adam:

Surtur
Facts
His own silly tactics being used against him

List of things that trigger Surtur:

Adam
Robtard
Concepts

Another "no you" essentially? Delightful.

That's why concepts trigger you, m8?

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
That's why concepts trigger you, m8?

No broham.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
List of things that trigger Surtur:

Adam
Robtard
Concepts

Is that all Adams or just you?

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Is that all Adams or just you? You tell me!

Originally posted by Henry_Pym
The autism is too damn high in here...

You said Trump in the post you said you didn't name Trump... Were your parents twins or something? He said he made no direct accusation about Trump.

This is true, because his post didn't directly accuse Trump of anything, just mentioned that when someone does, Surtur blows a gasket.

Try to be less stupid in the future my friend.

Originally posted by NemeBro
He said he made no direct accusation about Trump.

This is true, because his post didn't directly accuse Trump of anything, just mentioned that when someone does, Surtur blows a gasket.

Try to be less stupid in the future my friend.

I don't care when people accuse Trump of shit. I'll point out hypocrisy as I see it, and they "blow a gasket" whenever it gets done.

Originally posted by NemeBro
He said he made no direct accusation about Trump.

This is true, because his post didn't directly accuse Trump of anything, just mentioned that when someone does, Surtur blows a gasket.

Try to be less stupid in the future my friend. Learn context and then try again.

Altrightboy still pushing his Alt-facts instead of just admitting he made yet another reading comprehension error and moving on with his sad little life.

Originally posted by Robtard
Altrightboy still pushing his Alt-facts instead of just admitting he made yet another reading comprehension error and moving on with his sad little life.

...and he'll do it for another 12 pages. best to just put his shitshow on ignore.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
...and he'll do it for another 12 pages. best to just put his shitshow on ignore.

Is that what you say about everyone because the only peopl I've seen take an argument for as long as 12 pages is Robtard and Surtur.

Originally posted by Henry_Pym
Learn context and then try again. Awh, little sissy boy's unwarranted ego too big to admit he was wrong?

Originally posted by NemeBro
He said he made no direct accusation about Trump.

This is true, because his post didn't directly accuse Trump of anything, just mentioned that when someone does, Surtur blows a gasket.

Try to be less stupid in the future my friend.

What are you talking about?

I'm confused.


Robtard posted this:



Originally posted by Robtard
You consistently lose your shit whenever a fact about Trump is brought up that shows him in an unfavorable light. Surtur. This is a factual fact, for those of us who still remember.



And Surty posted this:


Originally posted by Surtur
No I don't. I just have a habit of pointing out the hypocrisy of people when they whine about something Trump did, but didn't whine when someone else did it. Then they use the "he's in power now" excuse, which is my favorite, since even before he was in power they played that hypocrisy game.


So Robtard posted this:

Originally posted by Robtard
Surtur, I made no direct accusation about Trump and you flipped out anyways and tried to move the topic to someone else.


So Henry posted this:

Originally posted by Henry_Pym
The autism is too damn high in here...

You said Trump in the post you said you didn't name Trump... Were your parents twins or something?




So isn't it clear that Henry is wrong? Robtard didn't accuse Trump of anything...in that post in question. Robtard was just pointing out that Surty likes to point out the hypocrisy from those accusing Trump of bad things.


Henry, just state, "Okay, my fault. Robtard didn't accuse Trump of anything in that post...this time." And if you want to save some face, state, "But my comment was in general about how they are constantly criticizing Trump but not turning the criticism towards their left-leaning favorites."

And, of course, I'd state, "Two wrongs don't make a right. Just because one does bad thing A, does not mean the other can do bad thing A. They are still bad thing A."

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
...and he'll do it for another 12 pages. best to just put his shitshow on ignore.

You may be onto something, but my ignore button is still virgin.

Originally posted by Robtard
You may be onto something, but my ignore button is still virgin.

mine has become a dirty busted whore

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
mine has become a dirty busted whore

My ears are burning.

Originally posted by Robtard
You may be onto something, but my ignore button is still virgin.

I have never used the Ignore function on a message board, and I am not about to start now.

Well that's two virgins, seventy more and we can get some Islamist to blown up KMC.

☝️️



http://www2.psy.unsw.edu.au/Users/smcdonald/Pics/communication.png

Originally posted by dadudemon
So isn't it clear that Henry is wrong? Yes.