Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

https://www.wdrb.com/in-depth/louisville-jail-officer-fired-for-hate-speech-facebook-posts-about-george-floyd-confederate-flag/article_f7a3dcc2-e24b-11ea-90c6-6fd0c55074ec.html

Clark responded that "not all speech is welcome or tolerated" and that, with current unrest throughout the country over racial injustice, including the local shooting deaths of Breonna Taylor and David McAtee, her posts "reflect your endorsement of hate speech."

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
https://www.wdrb.com/in-depth/louisville-jail-officer-fired-for-hate-speech-facebook-posts-about-george-floyd-confederate-flag/article_f7a3dcc2-e24b-11ea-90c6-6fd0c55074ec.html

Clark responded that "not all speech is welcome or tolerated" and that, with current unrest throughout the country over racial injustice, including the local shooting deaths of Breonna Taylor and David McAtee, her posts "reflect your endorsement of hate speech."

If she is in some sort of union I don't see this ending well for the director or at the very least she is going to be rehired and an apology issued to her.

Sorta like the DA in the atlanta shooting of brooks WAY overstepped and is now under investigation, not the officers.

Could be the real reason he acted against her.

Originally posted by cdtm
Could be the real reason he acted against her.

Seems like a good thread for Impediment to provide input since he has hands on experience.

"Louisville jail officer fired for 'hate speech' Facebook posts about George Floyd, Confederate flag" -Snip


Probably a staunch Trump supporter.

I was curious as to what she actually said:






So she's a martyr. - she made herself one. She literally made this exact point in her last post about black history vs. southern heritage.



It's high-time people close out their social media accounts or post completely anonymously. Until a freedom of speech protection regulation gets implemented, you cannot express your personal ideas unless it fits with whatever the moving target is for that date. And those considered "woke" just 4 years ago, are no longer considered "woke." It's a minefield. Espousing the beliefs of BLM would have gotten you thrown into prison during the cold war during the Red Scare. Now if you don't espouse anti-Nuclear family, anti-Law Enforcement, and pro-Communism, you're considered racist and terrible and should be fired/shunned like you raped someone.

Yeah she shouldn't have been fired for expressing herself. They only succeed in further polarizing society by firing someone when they express themselves in their private/personal lives.

Now if/when personal views is expressed at the work place, well then that''s something to be addressed. We as a society must resist the whole "thought police" mentality cause that's the easy path to fascism...

Except of course she's in law enforcement, in a position of power and her racism and bias could bleed into how she treats certain people under her care.

If she were to have an incident with say a Black inmate, that inmate's lawyer could use her racist social media comments as a weapon against her and the jail/state would get sued for allowing her to remain when they knew how she felt towards certain people due to their skin color.

Originally posted by Robtard
Except of course she's in law enforcement, in a position of power and her racism and bias could bleed into how she treats certain people under her care.

Just like a free speech nation allows, her employer can fire her for going against what they feel is preferred speech.

Don't forget, kiddos, preferred speech from your employer != a violation of your free speech. You still have it.


Let's also note she didn't post anything actually racist. It was only racist to people who are "woke." Her position is explicitly anti-racist and she's not supportive of the racist group BLM or the inappropriate support of George Floyd. She did not post anything racist and only idiots will believe. Even her boss and union make that clear: she was fired because her kind of speech would be incindiary in the current politically correct climate and could cause rioting/looting and/or violence against fellow cops. She was fired because she was talking about criminals who commit crimes that she's opposing those criminals commit. lol, this is a CF.

Originally posted by Robtard
If she were to have an incident with say a Black inmate, that inmate's lawyer could use her racist social media comments as a weapon against her and the jail/state would get sued for allowing her to remain when they knew how she felt towards certain people due to their skin color.

In this instance, you're referring to tort. In tort, you have to prove a preponderance of evidence, not "beyond a reasonable doubt." In this case, it is difficult to collect any evidence making the tort case nigh-impossible. Meaning, your point here is actually invalid.

In order to make such a case to take up a case, you need regulatory controls in place such as audits and fines to collect such evidence.

This is part of why I want to do away with for-profit prisons and implement incarceration regulations. Some regulations are obvious and no-nonsense and this is one area where it should exist.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
https://www.wdrb.com/in-depth/louisville-jail-officer-fired-for-hate-speech-facebook-posts-about-george-floyd-confederate-flag/article_f7a3dcc2-e24b-11ea-90c6-6fd0c55074ec.html

Clark responded that "not all speech is welcome or tolerated" and that, with current unrest throughout the country over racial injustice, including the local shooting deaths of Breonna Taylor and David McAtee, her posts "reflect your endorsement of hate speech."

And?

Originally posted by Surtur
And? other people seemed to get the point...

Originally posted by dadudemon
Just like a free speech nation allows, her employer can fire her for going against what they feel is preferred speech.

Don't forget, kiddos, preferred speech from your employer != a violation of your free speech. You still have it.

Precisely.

Originally posted by NewGuy01
Precisely.

https://i.imgur.com/VRqmzjs.gif

This thread is da doooooooooooooooood mon thread.

Originally posted by Blakemore
I am so in love with Matt Damon.


Yeah, we noticed.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Just like a free speech nation allows, her employer can fire her for going against what they feel is preferred speech.

Don't forget, kiddos, preferred speech from your employer != a violation of your free speech. You still have it.


Let's also note she didn't post anything actually racist. It was only racist to people who are "woke." Her position is explicitly anti-racist and she's not supportive of the racist group BLM or the inappropriate support of George Floyd. She did not post anything racist and only idiots will believe. Even her boss and union make that clear: she was fired because her kind of speech would be incindiary in the current politically correct climate and could cause rioting/looting and/or violence against fellow cops. She was fired because she was talking about criminals who commit crimes that she's opposing those criminals commit. lol, this is a CF.



In this instance, you're referring to tort. In tort, you have to prove a preponderance of evidence, not "beyond a reasonable doubt." In this case, it is difficult to collect any evidence making the tort case nigh-impossible. Meaning, your point here is actually invalid.

In order to make such a case to take up a case, you need regulatory controls in place such as audits and fines to collect such evidence.

This is part of why I want to do away with for-profit prisons and implement incarceration regulations. Some regulations are obvious and no-nonsense and this is one area where it should exist.

The Confederate Flag and "What about the whites" is associated with dog whistling.


Perhaps unfairly, but it is what it is.

Originally posted by Robtard
"Louisville jail officer fired for 'hate speech' Facebook posts about George Floyd, Confederate flag" -Snip


Probably a staunch Trump supporter.

Shut up already

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
other people seemed to get the point...

So you can't articulate the reason for posting your topic. I understand.

And btw kiddo: there is already a Floyd thread. If you need a link just ask.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
other people seemed to get the point...

Everyone else got it...