Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Where are you guys? Don't you want to talk about the election?

Well I have a job and need to sleep at night. I know, crazy.

Ill talk. Why do you think Trump won?

And what did he promise that specifically excites you?

There are these things called time zones. It means that when it is 8:49 a.m. in the U.K., it is 2:49 a.m. in the Midwestern U.S. You know, when working adults are sleeping.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
There are these things called time zones. It means that when it is 8:49 a.m. in the U.K., it is 2:49 a.m. in the Midwestern U.S. You know, when working adults are drinking.

Fixed that so he understands better.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Ill talk. Why do you think Trump won?

And what did he promise that specifically excites you?

He's excited that Trans women will have to use the men's bathrooms so he has a better chance at "bumping into" them.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Fixed that so he understands better.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
He's excited that Trans women will have to use the men's bathrooms so he has a better chance at "bumping into" them.


Fair enough. At least it benefits him on some way.

Go Trump!

Originally posted by Robtard
Well I have a job and need to sleep at night. I know, crazy.


Burn ❤️‍🔥 😂

Make your jokes, I ****ing told you Trump will win.

Originally posted by FalconPaunch!
Make your jokes, I ****ing told you Trump will win.
Presupposing you did, what do you think this proves? Good predictions can be wrong and bad predictions can be right. What matters is the data and methodology you used to come to that conclusion.

Allan Lichtman, PhD Harvard, failed to predict the election, while Moo Deng, a pygmy hippopotamus calf, "predicted" that Trump would win by choosing the food bowl with Donald Trump's name on it over he food bowl with Kamala Harris' name on it. Does that mean that Moo Deng is more cognizant of American history and politics than Allan Lichtman? Of course not.

Only an idiot would take pride in conclusion they arrived at through unresearched guesswork.

My reasoning was "the shy conservative factor" and when even the betting odds showed Trump as the favourite, I knew he'd comfortably win.

We've been this before in 2016, it was obvious. Not only that, Trump was rallying crowds of thousands and getting people on his side, people like Tulsi Gabbard and RFK Jr. He's leading for all Americans, and he's going to do a good job.

Originally posted by FalconPaunch!
My reasoning was "the shy conservative factor" and when even the betting odds showed Trump as the favourite, I knew he'd comfortably win.

We've been this before in 2016, it was obvious. Not only that, Trump was rallying crowds of thousands and getting people on his side,

Okay, just to put things in context, and stop you blowing yourself too much, would like to remind you that, Before the UK election, I said it will be hilarious to see Starmer (who everyone knew was going to be PM) suck up to Trump as President. But you said that won't happen, it will be Starmer and Biden.



Originally posted by FalconPaunch!
people like Tulsi Gabbard and RFK Jr. He's leading for all Americans, and he's going to do a good job.


Gabbard and RFK Jr are trash though.

Well, Ass guard, at the time, Biden had won the primaries, so I thought Biden had a chance. He dropped out, looked like a gust of wind could blow him over...

Starmer sucking up to Trump is cringe as fvck.

Originally posted by Astner
Presupposing you did, what do you think this proves? Good predictions can be wrong and bad predictions can be right. What matters is the data and methodology you used to come to that conclusion.

Allan Lichtman, PhD Harvard, failed to predict the election, while Moo Deng, a pygmy hippopotamus calf, "predicted" that Trump would win by choosing the food bowl with Donald Trump's name on it over he food bowl with Kamala Harris' name on it. Does that mean that Moo Deng is more cognizant of American history and politics than Allan Lichtman? Of course not.

Only an idiot would take pride in conclusion they arrived at through unresearched guesswork.

He made 40-50 predictions, which included a Biden win, a Harris win and a Trump win.

Your statement is ridiculous Robtard.

Not as ridiculous as you actually doing what he said in that statement.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Not as ridiculous as you actually doing what he said in that statement. Oh yes, I forgot I made 40-50 predictions on the election.

A week ago you were touting me as having an erection over Trump winning. I even posted my latest prediction of Trump getting 312 electoral votes, which looks like it'll happen once Arizona and Nevada finish counting.

Okay Someone give Falcon a medal.

Originally posted by FalconPaunch!
Starmer sucking up to Trump is cringe as fvck.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Okay Someone give Falcon a medal.



Ass guard, I'll be laughing with you, probably crying too considering that PM cardboard is trying to be socialist and doing deals with Trump simultaneously... I don't know how you can do both.