There are these things called time zones. It means that when it is 8:49 a.m. in the U.K., it is 2:49 a.m. in the Midwestern U.S. You know, when working adults are sleeping.
Presupposing you did, what do you think this proves? Good predictions can be wrong and bad predictions can be right. What matters is the data and methodology you used to come to that conclusion.
Allan Lichtman, PhD Harvard, failed to predict the election, while Moo Deng, a pygmy hippopotamus calf, "predicted" that Trump would win by choosing the food bowl with Donald Trump's name on it over he food bowl with Kamala Harris' name on it. Does that mean that Moo Deng is more cognizant of American history and politics than Allan Lichtman? Of course not.
Only an idiot would take pride in conclusion they arrived at through unresearched guesswork.
My reasoning was "the shy conservative factor" and when even the betting odds showed Trump as the favourite, I knew he'd comfortably win.
We've been this before in 2016, it was obvious. Not only that, Trump was rallying crowds of thousands and getting people on his side, people like Tulsi Gabbard and RFK Jr. He's leading for all Americans, and he's going to do a good job.
Okay, just to put things in context, and stop you blowing yourself too much, would like to remind you that, Before the UK election, I said it will be hilarious to see Starmer (who everyone knew was going to be PM) suck up to Trump as President. But you said that won't happen, it will be Starmer and Biden.
Well, Ass guard, at the time, Biden had won the primaries, so I thought Biden had a chance. He dropped out, looked like a gust of wind could blow him over...
Oh yes, I forgot I made 40-50 predictions on the election.
A week ago you were touting me as having an erection over Trump winning. I even posted my latest prediction of Trump getting 312 electoral votes, which looks like it'll happen once Arizona and Nevada finish counting.
KMC Community Forums
Nov 6th, 2024 02:49 PM
