They fight at Argos. The Kraken is trying to destroy Argos, while Cloverfield is trying to defend it.
Who wins?
__________________
All the ways you wish you could be, that's me. I look like you wanna look, I **** like you wanna ****, I am smart, capable, and most importantly, I am free in all the ways that you are not.
If it destroys enough of the city, it wins by default since it's Colverfield's job to defend it....2 giant monsters fighting will definitely destroy the city.
Another thing...Kraken was invulnerable and unstoppable...the only thing that stopped him was Medusa's head.
True, but the Kraken was never carpet bombed either. I don't know how the Kraken would fare against modern weapons. I doubt the Kraken has Godzilla durability though.
If the most powerful God in the Greek pantheon says it's invulnerable to damage...it's invulnerable.
But yeah, it was stated to be invulnerable, but nothing ever challenged it, it was just turned to stone, which was a loophole since it didn't actually hurt it.
OK screw defending the city, they just fight. I didn't realize that protecting the city would hinder Cloverfield.
__________________
All the ways you wish you could be, that's me. I look like you wanna look, I **** like you wanna ****, I am smart, capable, and most importantly, I am free in all the ways that you are not.
^I would think the Gods of Olympus >>> Military weaponry such as that (which killed Clover anyway).
By virtue of size at the very least, I think the Kraken has an inherent advantage. I think it was said somewhere by a developer on the movie that the Kraken was upwards of 500 feet tall (he looked way bigger though), whereas Clover stands about 30 stories tall (though I'm not sure of the length).
Clover didnt go down..... what movie did you watch. He was still walkin around when the credits rolled. What did they have in the movie that was greater than military weapons. Besides lightning.
The director of Cast Away said that that box that Tom Hanks Was hanging onto the whole movie, had a satalite phone inside of it that was waterproof.....
We never see the Monster die. So it dont matter what the director says.
I don't think that really accounts for what the director of Cloverfield said though, I don't remember seeing the creature alive and well after they blew up NYC or seeing it walk or anything...I'd like to see this proof
Yes he did. Not seeing the monster die is rendered irrelevent when it's confirmed to die. A director's words on an otherwise abiguous event that you're clearly trying to overinterpret with irrelevent comparisons >>> the ambiguous event on its own. In other words, it DOES matter. Clover's dead.
Besides their status as, you know, Gods, a piece of Hades turned into a 500 foot sea monster that, by the movie's story, singlehandedley defeated the Titans.
Look u dont need to get so angry. And no it doesnt matter what a director says. He could say anything. There is no proof that hes dead. Im sorry.
And as for the story of the new clash of the titans. Sounds like it sucks. According to greek myth, zeus defeated the titans. Hades wasnt even in the origional clash of the titans. So if they **** up the story so much i dont even care about this thread nemore. The Kraken wins i guess.
Well actually, the point is...if the guy who makes the movie says that the creature dies at the end of the movie....by default the thing is dead. If I'm the boss of a company, and I say you're fired at the end of the day...at 5 o'clock you're done.
We didn't see it, but that didn't mean it didn't die...it meant it died, but the camera got crushed before it died.
And they messed up the story, but the Kraken still was powerful enough to easily, and single handedly destroy every Titan...and the gods could do nothing to harm it.
KMC Community Forums
Aug 8th, 2010 01:32 AM
