How strong is Neo and Lucy in this? Are they at full power? Because just the two of them at full power should be enough to take out the Marvel team. Heck, Lucy alone at full power might be able to do it.
Hancock will have to fight his way through it though and he is beaten featwise by Thor,Vision, and Scarlet or at least has no answer for some of theyre offensive and defensive capabilities.
Lucy just straight up waves them and her own team away.
He's not beaten featwise by any of them. He is still vastly stronger than anyone on that team, and durable enough that RPG's literally bounce off of him. He's also way faster than all of them and able to use his speed in combat. He also doesn't tend to hold back. He'd probably just fly around punching people and hurling tornadoes at them.
I'm not arguing Thor's ability to survive explosions to the face, as Thor and Avengers 2 showed he could do that pretty well. But Thor is not stronger than Hancock. He is not faster than him. Hancock could and would speedblitz him and Thor is very vulnerable to punches.
Lol. Show me Hancock delivering a nuclear sized attack or tanking it. I am not arguing that Thor could beat him, just that Thor has better offensive feats and defensive feats that dwarf what Hancock has shown to do. Thats like me sayi g Im not arguing Hancocks ability to throw whales but he is weak against alcohol.
Durability is kind of a wash, because they each have better feats against different things. The Sokovia and BiFrost blasts are better energy durability feats than Hancock has by a long shot, but the train stop is a far better blunt-force durability (and strength) feat than anything Thor has shown. So, it's hard to make accurate judgments there. What we can say for certain though is that Thor's high end striking power/damage output feats are better, and Hancock's speed feats are better.
But, as people have pointed out, Lucy solos in anyways.
__________________ Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway.
Thor is not Mjolnir. It is a feat, but it's not something Thor himself can do. I'm comparing strength to strength. Direct feats between them. And again, Thor's ability to tank explosions is irrelevant. Punches from Hulk and Kurse and hits from Malekith still rocked him.
Hancock is stronger than Thor. He is faster than Thor. He is durable enough to tank hits from a being his equal in strength, which means he is durable enough to tank hits from Thor and Mjolnir.
If Thor is not Mjolnir than how can he ( Hancock)tank hits from Mjolnir? Just sayin. May wanna edit that part. And I think Hancock would most likely win between the two due to more cartoony physics in his movie.
You were using Mjolnir's feats like Thor himself did it. Thor used Mjolnir to produce the Jotunheim Earthquake. Vision could do the same thing, as it's the hammer, not Thor.
Hancock can tank hits from Mjolnir(at least a good few) if characters like Hulk and Kurse can as well. Hancock is easily with them in strength due to the cartoony physics of his movie.
To be fair, Thor never got knocked out by hits from Hulk, Kurse or Malekith. Never even looked like he got seriously hurt or incapacitated. Everytime he gets hit he just gets back up, sometime reeling but never to the point that he's unable to continue the fight.
That's true. But Hancock as of now probably still has higher strength feats than even Kurse. The whale toss and the train stop and the casualness with which he did them should make it so Thor's hurting. Plus, Hancock is pretty ruthless and could just fly him into space.
KMC Community Forums
Feb 21st, 2017 08:09 PM
