Gender: Female Location: You don't need to know!!!!
What do u think about ur gov's?
what do u think of ur gov's? do u think they are going by the way side or are they doing just fine!!!!!!
i won't be on here all the time but u can talk to others on here if u like!!!!
__________________ Thing's never last but guess what i do i last forever 'cause i'm an x-man, i'm superman, i'm a pirret, i'm a princess, and a fairy that will live 'til the end of time!!!!
so don't underestimate me!!!!!!
I CAN CAST U INTO THE NEXT WORLD IF U LIKE!!!!!!!
I MAKE UR LIFE A LIVING HELL IF U LIKE TOO!!!
DON'T UNDERESTIMATE THE POWER OF ONE BEING OVER 10 MILLION OTHERS!!!!
Last edited by skiiboyz342 on Nov 14th, 2005 at 01:38 PM
If it was ran by more woman, it could be much better. ..I think most men are more power hungry, wanting dominance of other countries, ...Most women understand the rhythms of life and are able to go with the flow...Men want to push , pull, resist, direct the flow..Women experience it....then mold with it to produce harmony........When you learn that might is not right that strength is not power over, but power with; that absolute power demands of theirs absolutely nothing then maybe we'd have some peace in this world.....I don't mean to generalize here.....Just an observation.
Yes, it could and would, Deb. However, not to knock women in public office, because I do feel we need more of them to create balance. The general consensus about why women do not make good candidates for public office is because their emotions are too closely tied to their decision making....from trivial matters to the most complex, in everyday life let alone politics. And thus, it's is difficult to separate these two in very tense situations, even for the most hardened and experienced of men in office. I know I'm using a very wide paintbrush" when I am stating, but the generality is true. It's not a bad thing, it is what it is. Now for all you people out there who think I'm woman bashing, noticed earlier I said we do have a need for more women in public office so that we can have balance in these critical decision making positions.
Gender: Female Location: every which way but loose
Both Debs and Bobby present good points, and that's just the problem.. we need governments of equal measure, the men for the hard hitting decision making and the women for the more spiritual, humane solutions. This thread is so generalised, I expect to be slammed for saying this But anyway, surely we're bordering on a discussion about a 'Government Utopia' here?? It's not perfect, it never can be, and in answer to the initial question, I think the British government have a hell of a lot to answer for. But my views have altered slightly over the last few years. I once thought Blair was a blustering, moronic, ignorant, weak fool. I now just think he's a fool...
Gender: Unspecified Location: Lost in a Roman Wilderness of Pain
I think the chilean goverment's great when it comes to international affairs.. however even though my president's a socialist it's still too conservative for my taste... well it is south america...
__________________ "Progress is man's ability to complicate simplicity." — Thor Heyerdahl
Belgian government isn't too bad (too many liberal idea's tho)
The flemish government is one I have more faith in at the moment (tho still too many liberals)
__________________ Be smart, be cool, be sexy = be LIBERAL!
I give mine a five. I say this because I still believe in the way my country's government is set up, BUT the powers that be aren't doing a great job. They're not even doing an average job. I fear it's only going to get worse until the next administration comes to power.
I honestly think our forefathers would be quite disappointed with the current America. This is not the country that they fought to create.