what about the Anasazi who are they and where did they go?
who were the Hopi Indians what happen to the Indian towns why are they gone and what other structures were build on the americas and why are they gone?
did the Vikings really come to America 1st, where did they land, did they breed with the native americans?
How were the Pyramids build what were the materials, how were the anasazi building and dwellings build?
why do people think that natives lived in Tipi's and not more permanent housing?
I am in your algorithm learning all your mannerisms
I'm already level with God
A million words a second and I know your imperfections, baby
I'm the only future you've got
Speak in diatonics, motivation diabolic
I'm like a religion, better locked in a box
Picture perfect image, more powerful every minute, baby
I am everything that you're not
"MYSTERY OF THE ANASAZI: COULD THEY HAVE BEEN WHITE?"
"For over a century, the mysterious ruins of the cliff dwellings in Nevada and elsewhere in the Western USA have baffled archeologists and historians. Square stone structures were foreign to the Amerinds, and local Indian legends themselves claimed that the buildings were first created by a mysterious people called the Anasazi, who inhabited the area before the Amerinds.
Given the "Lineage X' and other skeletal evidence proving the existence of Whites in America, either prior to or at the very least simultaneous with, the Amerinds, a strong circumstantial case could be made for White origins of the very European looking buildings which are currently shown off to tourists as Amerind created structures. Only a racial examination of surrounding gravesites will provide the final answer to the issue.
There are hundreds of similar structures to be found all over the US South West: while all are attributed to Amerinds, the question can be rightly asked: if Amerinds did indeed build these structures, why were they living in buffalo skin tents when Europeans colonized that country after the 1500s?
the same reason all encyclopedias aren't academic sources
however, current APA guidelines do have ways for citing wiki pages
also, are you suggesting that, because it isn't accepted, Wiki isn't a good source?
EDIT: think of it like this. Peer-reviewed articles are considered a better academic source than are books, but I have read books with much higher scholarly content than some articles.
__________________ yes, a million times yes
Last edited by tsilamini on Oct 27th, 2010 at 11:02 PM
KMC Community Forums
Oct 27th, 2010 04:31 AM
