They're going to be in their homes tonight with their guns loaded, and if you try to break into their homes to steal, to set fires, I'm highly recommending they blow you back out of the house with their guns,"
“ I commend this sheriff and those around who preach his teachings. Just because we want to protect our homes and communities does not mean we agree with what happened in Minneapolis.”
“Grady Judd, please rescue Chicago , from the look the other way police.”
Your Lord knows very well what is in your heart. Your soul suffices this day as a reckoner against you. I need no witnesses. You do not listen to your soul, but listen instead to your anger and your rage.
yes. you have the right to defend your person with lethal force. this does not apply to "defending" your possessions
__________________
Your Lord knows very well what is in your heart. Your soul suffices this day as a reckoner against you. I need no witnesses. You do not listen to your soul, but listen instead to your anger and your rage.
Fact Check: US law The prime legal protection you may have for shooting an intruder is called the "Castle Doctrine". There is also another doctrine called "Stand Your Ground" that may provide some protection depending on the state you live in. Both of these doctrines fall under the broader umbrella of self-defense.
So is it illegal to shoot an intruder? The answer depends on whether you were acting in self-defense and whether any of these doctrines apply.
however, protecting yourself ≠ protect your possessions
__________________
Your Lord knows very well what is in your heart. Your soul suffices this day as a reckoner against you. I need no witnesses. You do not listen to your soul, but listen instead to your anger and your rage.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Good luck making that stick in literally any case where a mob of criminals break into homes and businesses and get shot to death. Since literally multiple cases of this exist, already, and not a single prosecution has been moved forward, it's just not going to happen.
I know you want random innocents to be harmed and their possessions taken for "reasons", but this is just going to end up with more people getting killed. You shouldn't support this.