Warning: Silly questions? Do not use IQ in any circumstance:)
In this tread you will(if you like) ask silly questions, that aren't fully disected from logic, but just sound silly and there are multiple or no answer to them...
For example: why do we choose to kill one bug??? Sometimes we just let a bug go, and in other we go frenzy? Why's that? Or sometimes when a bug is passing along, we are still and benevolent in one sec, and in another we snap it ...
You're trying to initiate that irrationality though, so it's meaningless.
__________________ Recently Produced and Distributed Young but High-Ranking Political Figure of Royal Ancestry within the Modern American Town Affectionately Referred To as Bel-Air.
Well, if you think that matter of continuity of emotions and instincts in time, and relation between two moments are irrational than maybe you are a little more 'tangible' than I supposed...
If you think that philosophy hides itself in 'big' questions, you're just interested in philosophy, not philosopher...
Actually this topic I offered was considered in seminar in some advanced science camp I attended, and all students who applied have had minimum IQ of 156, so if you think that we were just fooling around with those questions, think twice, or trice, or whatever you needed
No. Science is the process of explaining how things happen or came to be. Religion is the belief that you should have faith in whatever easy answer is given.
Because religion can do well without science, and science without religion absolutely not, even the categorisation of scientists are made in religious way, like heretics, dogmatics, revolutionist, and so on and on...
Or simply because you can not prove what can not be proven. It is as easy to say that God exist as thast he does not, because you can not find out. Got is "everything and nothing", his existance is of "no shape" and therefore his existance can not simply be "proven". Science has nothing to do with religion, and is most certainly not dependent on religion. The scientific research of religions is simply a minor part of what is a huge subject.
In brief, science can not disprove religion because religion can not be disproved. You can not disprove the faith that one person has over a certain thin, and most certainly not with such a large matter as religion.
There is always detours, and if your faith in your religion is strong enough, you can work your way around any scientific statement.
__________________
"You will too eventually be part of my collection"
Last edited by Nozdormu on May 7th, 2007 at 08:02 AM
KMC Community Forums
...
May 6th, 2007 09:21 AM
The belief of being the best at everything 
