An empty hand is merely a placeholder for which anything can be placed. Who's to say the empty hand isn't reaching for an eraser to erase CA from history? Who's to say soon it won't be holding a comic for which to shred CA?
Is an empty hand more powerful when it has something in it or when it has limitless options?
Superman stories are too strong and long to be erase remember? and plus he would just adapt to anything Empty Hand throws out unless he calls in the Presence.
So you're saying that everything that has ever happened be it fiction or non fiction is a worse story, and you're saying that anything that could ever possibly be written will still be a worse story?
So if Superman just stopped existing a couple years ago absolutely everything that could ever come to pass would still pale in comparison?
So what you're saying is that not only is Superman your favorite character, but everything that has happened to him in comic canon has also been the best story that has ever and will ever exist no matter what happens until this universe and its stories cease to exist?
Why is Superrman not your favorite character if you believe the story that surrounds his life is better than the billions of years of our universes stories past and present, fiction and non fiction?
By all means "his story" centers on him as a character.
Though if he isn't your favorite character what would you say is his standout story in a series of stories that amounts to the legend?
So you don't share any of Grant's opinions is what you're saying, but are under the impression that nothing past present or future can ever surpass his story?
I think Emptyhand is embodiment of bad imagination of readers.
So If there is one who can beat Emptyhand, It is embodiment of good imagination of comics.
So I think Superman may rival Emptyhand no matter how difficult and desperate The battle is.