The powers of the world have been doing it forever under the cover of one BS reason or the other. Population control? Who knows. The very food that we eat is poisonous (in America, it's called overfed, and undernourished ha ha). Soldiers are payed to kill. Deadly viruses and new strains of those viruses pop up without warning (who's behind it? LOL). Unprotected sex is like playing Russian Roulette, why kill? If you are fortunate enough to live in a country filled with dirty Politicians, and no way to eat because they greedily hoard all of the resources, and charge a kings ransom to people for their minimal needs to live, situations often end in senseless violence. If you don't work you should not eat right? What f@ck@ng work is there out there, no one is hiring is often the case. We call them terror mongers because of half truths the media feeds us, they may call themselves survivors.
Little children sold into prostitution or slavery by their very parents is commonplace in many countries. Drugs, weapons, liquor stores, and gangs on every other corner in ghettos is another way to funnel the less informed unto a one way street that leads to their own demise. Pick a f@c@ing door. Who needs Tonto to pump 14 in your head, when gunrunners are supplying bullied children with the means to execute their fellow classmates, while the cops are busting college students for Pot.
Religion is used as mass weapons of destruction, because if you can get a million morons behind your skewed cause, who will/can ever stop you? As for your question. Murder is never justified even if you are defending yourself, or someone else. Would this stop me from killing someone trying to kill me and my family? No.
"The Daemon lied with every breath. It could not help itself but to deceive and dismay, to riddle and ruin. The more we conversed, the closer I drew to one singularly ineluctable fact: I would gain no wisdom here."
Also, is being proactive about killing, worse than reactive? Like if you know a sexual predator is going to ruin another person's existence, or if you know a killer will strike again once he's cleared, would it be wrong to stop them from doing it?
I mean, it's illegal but in order for me to win some fights I'd have to cause permanent injuries with "lethal intent" because I'm not that big or good at MMA at this point in my life. I'd have to result to innovative dirty fighting which works wonders if you can be tactical by maintaining control over the fight or flight response.
__________________ "Compounding these trickster aspects, the Joker ethos is verbally explicated as such by his psychiatrist, who describes his madness as "super-sanity." Where "sanity" previously suggested acquiescence with cultural codes, the addition of "super" implies that this common "sanity" has been replaced by a superior form, in which perception and processing are completely ungoverned and unconstrained"
Last edited by KillaKassara on Sep 13th, 2014 at 02:48 AM
You'd be surprised what very select people can do when they enjoy pain or have no fear-reflex that inhibits them from doing something other than punch, kick, or grapple in a fight.
Hell they might be able to go completely limp as a survival mechanism in a fight, and the second you turn away they're going to pop up and sucker punch you in that nerve in your jaw - shutting your brain down and putting you to sleep.
Instead of a fight like this you get an assault like this.
Absolute strength is due to an imbalanced level of of fight response hormones. If the hormones aren't there to override your "don't do that it's too much" instinct which literally everyone has all the time, even MMA fighters during their most brutal fights.
Here's another example; meth increasing metabolism and activity levels to the point in which this person was hysterical and therefore able to fight harder and longer.
Hit the wrong person in the face, someone's who was repeatedly beat as a child or a non-neurotypical like myself, and they might just come back with absolute retaliation immediately and I don't care how much bigger you are or better at boxing you are, he might be able to knock you on your ass because you're just not as excited as him at that moment and you might not be quick enough to defend yourself like you should be able to.
__________________ "Compounding these trickster aspects, the Joker ethos is verbally explicated as such by his psychiatrist, who describes his madness as "super-sanity." Where "sanity" previously suggested acquiescence with cultural codes, the addition of "super" implies that this common "sanity" has been replaced by a superior form, in which perception and processing are completely ungoverned and unconstrained"
Last edited by KillaKassara on Sep 13th, 2014 at 03:10 AM
Pick the most one-sided fight of any two individuals with no birth-defects or debilitating illnesses (anorexia, obesity, Huntington's, narcolepsy) who're around the same age, and let the person who's likely to lose be in the right frame of mind and he can take out just about anybody.
__________________ "Compounding these trickster aspects, the Joker ethos is verbally explicated as such by his psychiatrist, who describes his madness as "super-sanity." Where "sanity" previously suggested acquiescence with cultural codes, the addition of "super" implies that this common "sanity" has been replaced by a superior form, in which perception and processing are completely ungoverned and unconstrained"
Last edited by KillaKassara on Sep 13th, 2014 at 03:17 AM
From a certain moral standpoint in which the majority should deem immoral....
It's subject to who you're asking I guess.
__________________ "Compounding these trickster aspects, the Joker ethos is verbally explicated as such by his psychiatrist, who describes his madness as "super-sanity." Where "sanity" previously suggested acquiescence with cultural codes, the addition of "super" implies that this common "sanity" has been replaced by a superior form, in which perception and processing are completely ungoverned and unconstrained"
__________________ "Compounding these trickster aspects, the Joker ethos is verbally explicated as such by his psychiatrist, who describes his madness as "super-sanity." Where "sanity" previously suggested acquiescence with cultural codes, the addition of "super" implies that this common "sanity" has been replaced by a superior form, in which perception and processing are completely ungoverned and unconstrained"
Do you concede to my argument about cunning, neurosis, and absolute strength being more beneficial in a fight than fitness, training, and skill?
"Training is nothing, will is everything. The will to act."
__________________ "Compounding these trickster aspects, the Joker ethos is verbally explicated as such by his psychiatrist, who describes his madness as "super-sanity." Where "sanity" previously suggested acquiescence with cultural codes, the addition of "super" implies that this common "sanity" has been replaced by a superior form, in which perception and processing are completely ungoverned and unconstrained"
I agree, to an extent.
Still, I'm subject to them.
If i feel i have to do something considered illegal, i will.
If i get caught, i'm willing to suffer the consequences.
KMC Community Forums
Sep 10th, 2014 04:04 AM
