People see The Hulk as a wild, dnagerous monster.
Others see him as a being who just wants to be left alone and if humanity was better to The Hulk, The Hulk would be better to them.
People also see The Punisher as a homicidal lunatic with no real conscience of morals in how he dispenses HIS justice to the world.
Others see a man who merely takes the law into his own hands because the law fails.
Which, in the end, is worse?
__________________ "No, when Luke uses anger he turns into Stevie Wonder at batting practice."
Hulk because he kills out of pure rage. There's no telling how many innocents an enraged hulk would kill because his rage over takes his empathy and logic completely. Whereas the punisher can control his anger and rage to only those who really deserve it.
Yes but Punishers amorality makes up for that , He'd let you out of a cage and then kill you if he found out that you had committed even a (reasonably minor ) crime.
To an extent, Hulk is worse. Punisher doesn't harm innocent people really, but Hulk wouldn't take it into consideration during a rage. If Banner himself could control it, obviously Hulk would have no morality problem, but since he can't, Hulk's a touchy hero. He's able to decipher right and wrong, it seems, but not to the extent that he needs to in order to be classified as a true hero. Punisher is a hero in the sense that he's trying to better the world, but he's ruining himself in the process. Hulk is worse, but he's certainly no villain.
Maybe...but I meant more along the lines of collateral damage. If someone hulk hated was riding in a public bus, hulk would smack it aside to get to that person without worrying about the other people inside getting hurt. If frank was in the same situation he would never risk hurting the other people just to get to his target.
Gender: Male Location: Perfect night for hunting lowlife.
Two of my favorite characters...but in the end hulk will cause more bad than good...punisher kills those who have it coming to them...hulk might accidentally kill an innocent...tho he might not mean to, it doesn't change the fact.
Well Punisher can resist killing if he want to, if u notice War Journal 1-3 and his appearences in Civil War. And he never go after innocents, so I would say Hulk is worse.
Technically because Hulk is retarded (using Savage who's caused the most damage) he can't be held morally accountable for his actions, at least not at the level that Frank can, because he doesn't know what he's doing. There's a huge moral difference between murdering a person and killing them because you're scared or don't realize how fragile they are.
If anyone is in the extreme moral wrong out of Hulk and Punisher it would probably have to be Banner
__________________
Graffiti outside Latin class.
Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
A juvenal prank.
Hulk isn't particularly smart, he's driven by rage and feelings. You can't blame him any more than you can blame an animal or a child for tipping over your grandma's ming vase.
Punisher's a bit different, he's much more of a hypocrite.
No, I actually mean Banner. He's responsible for allowing Hulk to keep on hurting people. As much as he tries to keep from hurting others he has to be aware that there's no way he can actually control the Hulk.
__________________
Graffiti outside Latin class.
Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
A juvenal prank.
KMC Community Forums
Jul 13th, 2007 07:20 AM
