Now Maul would have an advantage at the start of the fight, because Exar isn't used to fighting others with dual bladed lightsabers... Maul even though i doubt he was used to it at least knew of the possiblity.
Now Exar fought a lot more Jedi and killed a lot more of them. More experience and he has a far better control over the force. Maul would be dead.
Registered: May 2005
Location: Your Erogenous Zones
Personally i think they would kill eachother you know making a stab attack at the same time.No,something better Maul jumps at Exar but Exar gets control over Maul's body by using the force,and then trows him into a melting pit or something.
but I think Exar is one of the strongest sith's ever and maybe he can even compare to Sidious, and Maul is just a nice warrior Sith used as a tool bij Sidious. I think Exar would Force Pull Maul's horns out as soon as Maul takes his hood off.
__________________
Last edited by Smoker Stevens on May 8th, 2005 at 10:27 AM
kun is more powerful then sid, no doubt about it.
and he is hella more powerful then maul.
slain more jedi, has better control of the force, stronger(physicly)
now, no doubting maul would lose easily, but ive seen in many threads the ol' "hes killed more people" defense.
i dont like it.
anakin certainly killed more people and is more powerful than obi wan....but somehow manages to find his way into the hot tub?
weird, right?
no! this defense blows. And Vader certainly killed a lot more than luke, and is more powerful....yet....loses. (his hand, the fight, and his dignity)
Maul killed more than obi-but lost(shakes fist)
more than likely yoda has killed more than sids(seeing as how yoda is older than dirt) and loses.
grievous has killed more than obi, most likely, and gets owned.
A point it is, yes. but u must look on it from the way of expirience. I mean, u definitly have the upper hand in the fight if u are an expirienced fighter. Also, yes, that defense isnt really considerable, but u must take a look at what ppl who killed, and if they were more powerfull then the current opponent. so for example, if we know that Anakin defeated Dooku, and Obi defeated Anakin, is it so wrong to presume that Obi would defeat Dooku?
Attachment: 
May 8th, 2005 09:17 AM
