One girl is trying to sit back and observe until I become successful?
The other is holding out for another man?
Both are ignoring me for the same reason, basically.
They're doing the same thing, and I'm the money in the middle. It's so ****ing weird, anyway I think what they're doing is stupid in both cases how do I get one who's holding out for another man? She stopped hanging out because she has feelings for me?
The one holding out for me is less communicative so that's why I pick the other, easier to communicate with. The one holding out for me has hacked my computer and I really don't appreciate that. First of all it's illegal to spy on me, secondly it pisses me the **** off. Yea I know you're reading this bi-.
I say keep her off my computer with new anti-spyware and forget about the other one and find someone who's not sadistic. Anyone else think that's the best course?
__________________ "Compounding these trickster aspects, the Joker ethos is verbally explicated as such by his psychiatrist, who describes his madness as "super-sanity." Where "sanity" previously suggested acquiescence with cultural codes, the addition of "super" implies that this common "sanity" has been replaced by a superior form, in which perception and processing are completely ungoverned and unconstrained"
Last edited by KillaKassara on Oct 19th, 2014 at 04:45 AM
I'd kill for someone who believed in the philosophies I do.
Someone who's unaffected by their circumstance, but trying to break the patterns society inevitably instills. Someone who's able to succeed their stigmas, someone's who's actually developed intellectually, aesthetically, more so than normal, than average.
__________________ "Compounding these trickster aspects, the Joker ethos is verbally explicated as such by his psychiatrist, who describes his madness as "super-sanity." Where "sanity" previously suggested acquiescence with cultural codes, the addition of "super" implies that this common "sanity" has been replaced by a superior form, in which perception and processing are completely ungoverned and unconstrained"
Last edited by KillaKassara on Oct 19th, 2014 at 05:26 AM
It blows my mind how many people turn to random internet strangers for romantic advice. Must be the era we live in.
You just described about half the population under age 30. Your condescension to imagine that you're the only one trying to find their own way in the world, regardless of societal norms, is staggering.
I haven't because I specifically stated those who're making supreme accomplishments, ergo 'not' average.
__________________ "Compounding these trickster aspects, the Joker ethos is verbally explicated as such by his psychiatrist, who describes his madness as "super-sanity." Where "sanity" previously suggested acquiescence with cultural codes, the addition of "super" implies that this common "sanity" has been replaced by a superior form, in which perception and processing are completely ungoverned and unconstrained"
Average doesn't exist in people. It's an abstract concept. Any single person is going to be average in several areas, and "abnormal" in many, many more. The "average" person doesn't exist. Or, rather, a few probably qualify as average based on enough variables, but that percentage of the population is so small that it certainly can't mean what we say when we use the term.
Finding your way in the world according to your own rules and principles is great. Noble, even. But the mentality you seem to want to apply to large swaths of the population is a lie you're telling yourself. No one is normal, and everyone is extraordinary in some way, and everyone wants to be extraordinary in some way. And "supreme accomplishments" will mean different things to different people. You can't apply your standards to the accomplishments of others, because your aspirations may seem equally silly to them.
Do you see what I'm getting at? I'm not telling you to curb your ambition...whatever it may be. I'm trying to show you why common respect for the ambitions and accomplishments of others is equally noble.
__________________ "Compounding these trickster aspects, the Joker ethos is verbally explicated as such by his psychiatrist, who describes his madness as "super-sanity." Where "sanity" previously suggested acquiescence with cultural codes, the addition of "super" implies that this common "sanity" has been replaced by a superior form, in which perception and processing are completely ungoverned and unconstrained"
__________________ "Compounding these trickster aspects, the Joker ethos is verbally explicated as such by his psychiatrist, who describes his madness as "super-sanity." Where "sanity" previously suggested acquiescence with cultural codes, the addition of "super" implies that this common "sanity" has been replaced by a superior form, in which perception and processing are completely ungoverned and unconstrained"
I'm sure I can get it out of looks (as opposed to offering commitment, wealth, or a sweet vibe); but the issue is that they never just go up to guys and ask them that.
The fact that it has to be done a certain way and there's no way to know exactly how to go about that, for anyone, is very difficult for someone who doesn't like talking to people.
I've came pretty damn close just through looks, but they were looking for all this kinds of excitement and I'm a boring conservationist at best.
__________________ "Compounding these trickster aspects, the Joker ethos is verbally explicated as such by his psychiatrist, who describes his madness as "super-sanity." Where "sanity" previously suggested acquiescence with cultural codes, the addition of "super" implies that this common "sanity" has been replaced by a superior form, in which perception and processing are completely ungoverned and unconstrained"
Last edited by KillaKassara on Oct 20th, 2014 at 01:56 AM
__________________ "Compounding these trickster aspects, the Joker ethos is verbally explicated as such by his psychiatrist, who describes his madness as "super-sanity." Where "sanity" previously suggested acquiescence with cultural codes, the addition of "super" implies that this common "sanity" has been replaced by a superior form, in which perception and processing are completely ungoverned and unconstrained"
KMC Community Forums
Oct 19th, 2014 04:41 AM
