Probably because he goes on for about ten and a half minutes about something that contradicts the information we've been given. Which, yes, is the definition of stupid. And really glad guy on YouTube made another video recently. Highlight of day.
Because Vader already was chopping off limbs left and right with a cyborg that was superior to Grievous, and this was Vader past his prime? Antoine's wrong. Time to move on.
Didn't Vader only chop off one arm? Immediately after slamming Karbin on the ground with the Force? And is there any proof Karbin is more skilled than Grievous?
Nope, he basically said he only need one lightsaber and immediately chopped and arm off. Then Better-Grievous ran away. Snuck up on him. Hit him, and still somehow failed to kill him. Then when Vader deflected every blow from him, he got pushed away. And it was a statement by the guy who created him, so...
"When you wield the power of the dark side, one lightsaber is all you need." Yeah, he chops his arm off while Karbin is down on the ground, after he slammed him with the Force. I doubt he would have been able chop the limb off (at least that quickly, I can't really be certain how Vader would've fared without using the Force offensively) without ragdolling him first - and I don't think it's proof Vader > Grievous in a sabers only match. And what was Cylo's exact quote regarding Karbin / Grievous?
I also just noticed Karbin had Ahsoka's exact same lightsaber hilt from the Clone Wars...
I'll look again, but you mind explaining how you doubt Vader could do something defensive Kenobi did without any effort? (please log in to view the image)
EDIT: He says Grevious was only a first step. Unless you think he meant a step backwards, Karbin is supposed to be an improvement. Considering he hasn't gotten the upper hand on Vader at all, quite the opposite, he's obviously not comparable to Vader.
Last edited by FreshestSlice on Feb 16th, 2016 at 02:19 AM
Feb 15th, 2016 04:06 AM
Thanks Scribble!
